Anabolics
Search More Than 6,000,000 Posts
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Mach500's Avatar
    Mach500 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    CA, Redlands
    Posts
    44

    Question on Cell tech, and Nitro-tech

    Hey guys,

    I was just at some convention, and there was a model/bodybuilder guy there. I talked to him, and asked about his routine, and supplements. He said he recommended cell-tech, and nitro-tech, and one of their products of creatine.

    I've heard a lot of hype about cell tech, and nitro tech, and I am wondering if there really is that big of a difference. Has anyone noticed a difference in taking the two? I am taking protein from all sports nutrition store. I know cell tech, and nitro tech, are as expensive as hell. Is it worth the cost? Are there other alternatives?

    Help me out guys.

    Jason

  2. #2
    Archangel230's Avatar
    Archangel230 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NJ-USA
    Posts
    66
    I am apt to wonder whether or not that bodybuilder was working for muscle-tech. Don't waste your time. Cell Tech is a decent product (even though I can't stand muscletech because of their advertising practices). Nitrotech is like any other protein product except more expensive and with a trace of creatine.

  3. #3
    Short_Guy's Avatar
    Short_Guy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    133
    In my experience, Phosphagen HP is much, much cheaper and gets, at the very least, similar results.

  4. #4
    adonis_myth is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    51
    i have tried cell-tech and I really think it is a good product! especially the orange flavour with vanilla VP2 it is absolutely amazing for taste buds and gains!

    but the price is ridiculous

    i just use Vp2 and max muscle big max pre post now
    half the bigmax serving

    with nano creatine

  5. #5
    hawktribal's Avatar
    hawktribal is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    cornfed
    Posts
    1,096
    i've used them both , just go buy a cheaper creatine and protein. i mean just looking at the ads in magazines should give you an idea of how much bullshit they try to pull. you see the big mother truckers drinking their products and expect you to believe thats how they got big... pisses me off, just had to let that out

  6. #6
    want2bstronger is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    134
    nitro-tech's protein is very good tasting!

  7. #7
    Feli Fly's Avatar
    Feli Fly is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    79
    Nitro tech may taste good or cell tech may have you gain good, but there is no reason any other whey concentrate and multivitamin or any generic creatine monohydrate used with high GI carbs couldn't deliver the same results... and you'd spend half the $ or less.

    Do you think those 6 or 8 page ads are cheap? Heck no, and you are paying for them when you buy Muscletech stuff. The BBers or fitness models in their ads looked good long before CellTech, NitroTech, and Hydroxycut were ever invented BTW.

  8. #8
    OverDrive's Avatar
    OverDrive is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Tampa moving to the Beach
    Posts
    349
    well ... I just came off 3 months of cell tech and I have to say I did notice a big increase in strength and a little increase in size.
    This was the first supp I've used in over a year ... last year I loaded up on Phosphagen (from EAS) ... just dumped a scoop on my tounge and washed it down with grape juice .. I blew up! I gained 7 pounds in less than a month and kept about 3-4 lbs. of that.
    Over all .. I like the taste of cell-tech! But my next cycle will be straight up Phosphagen
    Last edited by OverDrive; 06-27-2003 at 07:52 PM.

  9. #9
    saboudian's Avatar
    saboudian is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan State University
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by Feli Fly
    Nitro tech may taste good or cell tech may have you gain good, but there is no reason any other whey concentrate and multivitamin or any generic creatine monohydrate used with high GI carbs couldn't deliver the same results... and you'd spend half the $ or less.

    Do you think those 6 or 8 page ads are cheap? Heck no, and you are paying for them when you buy Muscletech stuff. The BBers or fitness models in their ads looked good long before CellTech, NitroTech, and Hydroxycut were ever invented BTW.
    I agree about the Nitro-tech being nothing spectacular,i already answered the cell-tech topic in another thread.

    Man, feli fly you really just want to upset me don't you?

    It might be hard to beleive, and in the case of muscletech it is very hard to beleive. But those 6 and 8 page reports are making the product cheaper for the consumer, or at least thats what my economics prof told us.

    Hey, and theres nothing wrong with the fitness models looking good

  10. #10
    dynamike's Avatar
    dynamike is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    us
    Posts
    186
    i'll be honest I've taken the liquid sublingual creatine..phosphagen..and lately pinnacles..I can't tell the diff from when I am using it or not...mostly psych I think..the ease of the sublingual is what I like..right b/4 working out..but I really don't notice ant difference..

  11. #11
    Feli Fly's Avatar
    Feli Fly is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by dynamike
    i'll be honest I've taken the liquid sublingual creatine.. but I really don't notice ant difference..
    Yah any brand of sublingual creatine is a crock, man. The mg (creatine should always be measured in grams anyways) amounts are really low and it's a basically a ripoff.

    I used the Muscle Marketing ATP Advantage stuff back in undergrad because my team got to try it for free and I didn't notice a thing. It claims to have "the equivalent of 2500mg creatine per serving. So, assuming that's true, when you get 30 servings for $30, that's 75g creatine for $30.... yah great deal ... and sadly, I think the older original ones I used had even less creatine and cost more like $40 retail.

  12. #12
    ColdSore's Avatar
    ColdSore is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,952
    Its not worth it...perfect your diet and youll get the same results...

    As far as a creatine goes, MET-RX's MASS ACTION--by far the best supplement on the market. It come loaded with creatine, HMB, Glutamine, BCAA's, and more. I suggest everyone try it...its not to pricey either--$25 for about 2.5 to 3 weeks worth

  13. #13
    saboudian's Avatar
    saboudian is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan State University
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by ColdStone
    Its not worth it...perfect your diet and youll get the same results...

    As far as a creatine goes, MET-RX's MASS ACTION--by far the best supplement on the market. It come loaded with creatine, HMB, Glutamine, BCAA's, and more. I suggest everyone try it...its not to pricey either--$25 for about 2.5 to 3 weeks worth
    I wouldn't suggest the Met-Rx thing if it has all of that stuff in it, it'll just end up interefering with the creatine absorption and lowering the GI, of course everyone mixes their creatine in with their protein so go figure...

  14. #14
    repeatoffender's Avatar
    repeatoffender is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    114
    I found that the Cell Tech gave me terrible gas as well as the runs. Shortly after I took it I had to run to the bathroom, so I don't use it any more. The Nitro Tech is good, but I think you would get the same protein and results from a lot of other less expensive proteins on the market, like HDT Pro Blend, Optimum Nutrition's Pro Complex, or Cytosport Muscle Milk. As for the creatine though, I suppose it is just a matter of what your body reacts to best. I would buy a small amount first and see how that goes, and switch brands if you are not happy with the first.

  15. #15
    groverman1's Avatar
    groverman1 is offline Cross Dressing Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Motor City
    Posts
    2,548
    Cell tech tastes good well thats because all the damn sugar, after this last tub no more. As for nitro-tech there are much better and cheaper proteins out on the market.

  16. #16
    G Child's Avatar
    G Child is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Some kind of padded room...wearing some kinda white jacket...can't move...help!
    Posts
    2,572
    ....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •