Thread: VPX vs. LG's M1=T
01-15-2004, 03:09 PM #1
VPX vs. LG's M1=T
Is the delivery method of VPX's M1-T really any better then taking the pills from Legal Gear? What I mean is, is it worth the extra cash for VPX? Also, VPX claims they were the first to engineer 1-Test and Methyl 1-Test, anybody know if thats true, and weather or not it gives more credit to VPX's formula?
Curios to get some real info. I don't feel like getting burned for $50-$100. Most posts I've seen praise M1-T for real gains, but it's hard to tell who's for real.
Lastly, if M1-T basically is a steroid bonded to a lipid chain, how can it legally be sold? Is it in line to be inspected by the FDA? Will it be banned anytime soon? I appreciate any info you can give me.
01-15-2004, 06:38 PM #2Originally Posted by IronAdam
01-15-2004, 09:00 PM #3Originally Posted by CoRnErBaCk24
01-16-2004, 12:23 AM #4
LG or 1fast400,
The compound is already methylated, wtf does their delivery system do to improve that? VPX has been ripping ppl off for years.
01-16-2004, 03:19 AM #5Originally Posted by MMC78
01-16-2004, 12:21 PM #6Originally Posted by IronAdam
01-16-2004, 12:48 PM #7
i have gaspri which was 90 cap of 10 mg caps for like 30 something kilosports.com
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)