Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Maximum muscle growth
-
07-23-2004, 01:50 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 13
Maximum muscle growth
Im looking for maximum muscle growth but im not sure if what i was told was correct, i was told that to get maximum muscle i want to do more reps say 12-14 rather that super heavy with 4-6(for strengh with the 4-6 form what im told)for maximum growth of muscle, is this true??
-
07-23-2004, 02:17 AM #2
What I do is find out the absolute maximum that I can lift on each exersize. Then lift two thirds of that as many times as I can concentrating on different muscle groups each time u work out
-
07-23-2004, 06:32 AM #3Retired Vet
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 6,891
Here is an excellent resource from Warrior, a knowledgeable bro on this site..
These are his 'Guidelines to Growth'... worth a look
CLICK HERE
-
07-23-2004, 07:47 AM #4Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- I'm the Italian Stallion
- Posts
- 316
I think one more thing to think about is that there isnt just one way to grow. True some ways are better than others, but lets face it, there are too many different philosophies as far as which excersize triggers the most growth. IMO you should just listen to everyones advice and then go out and try several different things. Try high reps for a month or two. Then switch to less reps. I did the high rep thing and never saw any gains.
-
07-23-2004, 11:44 AM #5
for me 6-10 reps is optiamal for size gains. 12-14 reps is **** in my opinion.
-
07-23-2004, 11:46 AM #6
it also depends on the muscle too. legs-10-12 reps is the ticket. chest-1-8 occasionally 10-12 bicepts-8-12 occasionally down to 6 shoulders anything
-
07-23-2004, 11:50 AM #7
i also agree with cutmeup. Muscles are way way way too complex to only use one strategy and one philosophy to grow. For the longest time i have been using more of a low volume 1 set max intensity approach until stalling recently. i just went back to the pyramid and noticed quick hypertrophy and a .5 inch circumfrence gain in my arms. 17.5 jumped to 18 in 2-3 weeks of incorporating a new strategy and philosophy contradicting the much talked about dc method
-
07-23-2004, 11:59 AM #8
IMO coercing your body to adapt in a given way, in this case building muscle, requires a fairly constant change of stimulus. Physiologist types argue amongst themselves but you will hear adaptation generally takes place in 6-14 weeks. Everybody is different, you need to find what works for you and trial and error is the only way. IMO, your training background and the routine in question will largely determine length of a period.
While a training routine with a distinct time frame (a period) will continue to give you results until your muscles, joints, and CNS fully adapt. At the point of adaptation you need to change something(s) in the routine. The change in a routine can be as slight as swapping a few exercises, changing the rep/set scheme or it can be more involved, say starting a new period.
The above doesn't directly answer your question but that's becasue IMO there is no concrete answer to it. For me, I tend to gain the most muscle when reps range from 3-8 and I stick to heavy compound movements.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
04-16-2024, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS