-
09-10-2004, 09:51 AM #1
Legs growing faster than upper body
Hey guys, I've been training both my legs and my upper body with what I believe to be equal intensity, although my legs & glutes have really been responding well - but less so for my arms & back.
Is it just a matter of time? I read here at AR that arms and upper body growth will respond to leg growth via the teacher / student relationship.
-
09-10-2004, 09:54 AM #2VET
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 7,424
i had a teacher student relationship once.....man those were the days....
but anyways, legs are a biggger muscle, therefore they produce more GH. it's just a matter of time. i don't think your upperbody will ever grow as fast as your legs though.
-
09-10-2004, 09:55 AM #3
Genetics may also play a role.
Time will probably proportionalize bodyparts.
-
09-10-2004, 10:05 AM #4Originally Posted by Hypertrophy
-
09-10-2004, 10:11 AM #5
Feel blessed most guys don't have your gift. Our legs lag behind I call it "white man's weight lifter syndrome". A hulkster from the waist up wheeling around on toothpicks!
-
09-10-2004, 10:23 AM #6Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 349
hell thats a good thing in my book
-
09-10-2004, 04:52 PM #7
Thanks guys. I will to continue to set goals to achieve the symettry I desire. Definately nice to get the encouragement!
-
09-10-2004, 07:08 PM #8
I have this problem. Your other bodyparts will catch up... and when they do...
-
09-12-2004, 03:01 PM #9Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 608
don't mean to highjack this threat but quadzilla ur legs look ****in nutty man ****, wats ur training like
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Next cycle... Just...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS