Printable View
Page 11c of USA today:
In the article "After steroid admissions, what comes next".
There is a graphic that says "the impact of steroid use. In the part about how they work, USA today states "anabolic steroids are administered intravenously, orally, or through patches and creams"
I would not expect such ignorance on such a highly regarded newspaper. Just goes to show you what kind of BS the mass media is feeding the public about AAS and other things. :eek:
Wtf????
yup I'm looking at it right now.
yeah their was a stupid ass article I read the other day that said using AAS can put you at risk for HIV.....the media is fvcking retarded.
unreal.....everyone is so naive on the subject.
wow someone obviously was sloppy and didnt do their research.
Thats what's scary. I thought it was my local newspaper at first, which I would expect shabby work from them, but not a national newspaper.Quote:
Originally Posted by Polska
id love to meet the retard who reads that, then takes it IV..
i know it says on the bottle "for intramuscular injection" it's pretty hard to miss that.
And then sues USA today for BS info....Quote:
Originally Posted by Decadbal
better yet the kid dies and they crack down on juice like they are doing now on Ecstacy.Quote:
Originally Posted by aXe
blah blah blah........
blah... :)
thats pretty ****ed up! only someone stoooopid would do that!
Thats ridicolous it just shows you that you shouldnt beleive anything you read in a news paper
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoon
You'd be surprised at the number of stupid people in the world...Ephedra's banned aint it?
and 44 more days until pro hormones are banned as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Narkissos
pros ar banned brotha
I just bought some....now 43 more days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Decadbal
well yea...that's the problem...we're surrounded by idiots!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoon
(hate to bring up a dead topic, but...) remember the kid who tried injecting into his asshole?? because people said shoot in the ass, not in the gluteus muscle...he assumed that meant into his little sphincter??
just an example of how some people think...things like this come as no shock to me anymore.
Well I guess by now USA Today has got about 10,000 nasty-grams from folks who are disgusted with that much blatant (and dangerous) misinformation.
I hope so. I thought about emailing the author, but I know he will already be getting some about this.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Baron