Thinking of getting another guitar lately....i've got a strat at the moment my question to any guitar players on this site is if you own either or have played them which do you like better ? The PRS looks more comfortable
Associate Member
Thinking of getting another guitar lately....i've got a strat at the moment my question to any guitar players on this site is if you own either or have played them which do you like better ? The PRS looks more comfortable
Anabolic Member
I will sell you my Ibanez 540 Radius for $600
http://derek.inconsiderate.org/540r1.JPG
http://derek.inconsiderate.org/540r2.JPG
http://derek.inconsiderate.org/540r3.JPG
http://derek.inconsiderate.org/540r4.JPG
Never really got into the les paul, i got fat fingers, so i need a wizard like neck.
Associate Member
No thanks man try ebay
Associate Member
No doubt gibson les paul. My favorite guitar I ever had was a gibson les paul studio. Got it for only $1200 with a hardshell case at guitar center.
Associate Member
I dont know anything about guitars but a buddy of mine just gave me a bc rich bitch to sell for him on e bay. Its in good condition im my eyes with one knick. If your interested i can send you pics and maybe some info on it. I havent put it on the bay yet im waiting on him to give me some specifics on it.
New Member
I've got a strat too. go for the gibson for sure.
Smart Ass Member
I think you should play both on an amp just like yours or similar at a guitar shop. The gibson will have a flatter board, great for slide work and sounds like a... gibson les paul. The paul reed smith is a bit more like the strat neck but nicer, you can also get a tremelo on the PRS and it sounds like a... PRS. Play both for comfort both are nice.
Smart Ass Member
Listen everyone that looks at this thread and wants to sell a guitar... an Ibanez or a b.c. rich is not even close to the ballpark in terms of sound and quality. Sorry.
Anabolic Member
Haha. I find that funny, the Ibanez part. Les Paul good for one style, Ibanez better for the rest.Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
VET
Man a Les Paul any day!
Red
Associate Member
So it looks like Les rules
Associate Member
with a nice Marshall Bluesbreakers amp that'd be a nice setup !!!
Anabolic Member
eh, kirk is ok.......only reason he is is because satch taught him how to play....i'll take this guitar over any...even the les paul
Anabolic Member
Ibanez guitars are quality guitars bro. I play a jacskon SL-3 with a floyd rose. That thing shreds. But I would go with a PRS. I've played both, and like them, but I prefer the sound of a PRS. But either way, you can't lose.
Anabolic Member
That's an ugggggly guitar.eh, kirk is ok.......only reason he is is because satch taught him how to play....i'll take this guitar over any...even the les paul
Anabolic Member
doesnt have to be the chrome boy bro......any of the satch signature series guitars are incredible......makes a 40 dollar amp sound incredible.
Anabolic Member
That's true. Other than that shiny chrome, it's a nice guitar. But that finish would blind the hell outta me!!
Senior Member
les paul all the way
VET
I'm really not that good a player (my son is better than me and he's barely 12!) but I still prefer a Les Paul. I love the nice thin gibson necks and theoverall "feel" of a les paul.
Red
Smart Ass Member
Ibanez is for the masses... Kids just learning... Great starter guitars though. The steve vai is the only one that I know of that even has decent quality control. They were one of the first with 7 stringer, ala korn.
Senior Member
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO....PRS= better clarity and tone, lightweight and better looking.
BDTRs SHEMALE
Gibson Flying V Randy Rhodes addition
Anabolic Member
I like the PRS models, good weight, nice all around..Les Pauls are more a mestique guitar...I have an older gold top and love it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote