Democracy functions best when the population has as much varied and valuable information as possible
a National Broadcast system help brings to the national stage issues that other wise may not be covered in private media for variuos reasons
and also help keep Diversity in the national spotlight whether that diversity is Politcal opinion, Culture or science
In the UK the BBC is the powerhouse of information provided as a public service and is solely funded by the Tax payer via a TV TaX"
this is roughly $200 a year per person
in Japan its $255
this set up in the UK and Japan creates a "Dependancy free" media outlet not beholden to and Private interest or Leverage from one group or another
This Dependancy Free outlet is also able to Check the Uncheckable Private media that has an ever growing presence in our lives, on Poltics, and in all facets of our lives.
It is cetralizing ever more and is Owned by a few corporations that have undo influence over all.
it is not a conspiracy, But the Probabaility of A private media to have a "Mobilzation of Bias" that reflects a narrow view is highly probable, and has the ability to steer Poltical dbate, values and agenda setting
thus the radi of that bias will make it way into all programming since corpoarte stucture is relatively Un-democratic and leader driven
In the US only 1 dollar per person per year via Tax money is "given" to PBS
the rest they make up by the soliciting of Foundations, by "Viewers like you", and ever increasingly Corporate Money.
why do we not demand the same instution like the BBC that benfits other countries, surely $200-$250 is not too much to ask?
if we really want to make a dent in "democracy" and that lends it self to such unirversal appeal this one issue would be "it"