Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: King Kong

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,271

    Exclamation King Kong

    ABSOLUTELY AMAZING!! The only movie that has almost made me ever cry (besides la bamba and lion king lol) i reccomend this movie to anyone who hasnt seen a good movie in a long time

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Back to Sin City
    Posts
    138

    Thumbs up

    I loved it too, i had to leave about 20 to 30 minutes before it ended because my little one had a accident........but I will see it again.

  3. #3
    I've heard it wasn't good. Guess I'll go see it now.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,271
    Quote Originally Posted by IBdmfkr
    I've heard it wasn't good. Guess I'll go see it now.

    really? i couldnt find a flaw in the movie..it's def. not what you expect to see when you go in! it has much more than i could have imagnined..i'm a pretty tough critic and i thought this movie honestly had it all

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    L'Inghilterra
    Posts
    1,611
    I also heard it wasn't that good, but since I haven't seen it I can't personally say its bad. I'll look forward to it now, blockbusters with special effects usually are poor because of a bad storyline or poor acting. I hope this is a blockbuster with good acting as well, the storyline of course is classic so that isn't a problem

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    RIP Brother...
    Posts
    5,054
    Sorry, but for my money the special effects are flawed.
    My palms were running with sweat at the end though - I can't deal with heights.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    238
    I heard it's over three hours long. I can't sit there for that long. Reminds me of the Titanic.

  8. #8
    too long. ideal movie time for me is 140 minutes. this was around 180 minutes. bunch of stuff they could have cut out.

    but, special effects were good.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    RIP Brother...
    Posts
    5,054
    Quote Originally Posted by KeyMastur
    but, special effects were good.
    Most of 'em were but some of the bits where she was in Kong's hand were shabby IMO, jerky and unconvincing.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    OZ via NZ
    Posts
    1,024
    It was ok but i wouldnt see it twice just too long. Peter jackson fronted up $20 million to make it over 3 hours long since the studio agreed to a shorter film, the guys commited/or needs to be.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    6,175
    Peter Jackson overextends everything.....the last Lord of the Rings installment could've ended 5 different times at some points and by the REAL end of it I was just drained and not even into it anymore.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    12,114
    I thought it was a great movie but it was too long, they could have done without the first hour I reckon

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,884
    Quote Originally Posted by USfighterFC
    Peter Jackson overextends everything.....the last Lord of the Rings installment could've ended 5 different times at some points and by the REAL end of it I was just drained and not even into it anymore.
    I think I'm the only one who doesnt care for Lord Of The Rings. They're all too damn long. I'm just glad I was never in the theater to see any of them. I can't sit in a theater for more than 2 hours or I wanna get out of there.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •