All cops should be like him!

[stee]

This is how all cops should be!!!!

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/copisinsane.html

[HeavyHitter]

if thats real... thats insane!!! lolol

[Pooks]

Actually they already are like that..

"oh, whats that!, no seat belt!!. and u got a KUNG FU looking bag in the car!!" BANG BANG BANG!!!

"hello, i had ressisted arrest on I-75, i had to decapitate the subject, please bring assistance, and also bomb squad suspicious bag"

[Ufa]

I saw that on TV about 6 months ago. I can't believe any body would put
their self in such a dangerous position for a few bucks an hour.

[Oki-Des]

When I used to live in Japan, the cops would try to pull over some bosozoku (motorcylce gang members) who were causing problems. I remember the cops just had a megaphone and would ride behind the gang asking them to please pull over. The members were taunting them and only driving about 10 miles per hour and the cops just follow. It happens all the time and I used to wish those punk kids could have seen what would happen if they did this in America or Russia or somewhere where the cops use a little force!

[stee]

When I used to live in Japan, the cops would try to pull over some bosozoku (motorcylce gang members) who were causing problems. I remember the cops just had a megaphone and would ride behind the gang asking them to please pull over. The members were taunting them and only driving about 10 miles per hour and the cops just follow. It happens all the time and I used to wish those punk kids could have seen what would happen if they did this in America or Russia or somewhere where the cops use a little force!

Fukin A!!!!

[stee]

I saw that on TV about 6 months ago. I can't believe any body would put
their self in such a dangerous position for a few bucks an hour.

Its their job, to people like that its not about the money, its about the service they are providing for the public, putting your life on the line is just part of the day as far as they are concerned and that how it should be.

[GQ-Bouncer]

LOL @ the fact he used a shotgun during the chase

i guess radioing ahead and putting down dragons teeth has gone out of style

[GQ-Bouncer]

When I used to live in Japan, the cops would try to pull over some bosozoku (motorcylce gang members) who were causing problems. I remember the cops just had a megaphone and would ride behind the gang asking them to please pull over. The members were taunting them and only driving about 10 miles per hour and the cops just follow. It happens all the time and I used to wish those punk kids could have seen what would happen if they did this in America or Russia or somewhere where the cops use a little force!

Japan actually has an AWESOME police force & justice system, its actually cited as one of the best in the world & there conviction rate is somewhere in the 90's % .

I agree with what you saying though, I'd like to see tougher laws & enforcement imposed as well... sorta like Singapore, where the death penalty is mandatory for drug traffickers

[spywizard]

why don't we just cut off the hands of people who steal??

or stone women in the streets to death if they show any part of thier leg..

or stone her if her husband "Claims" she was committing adultry..

I like the video by the way

[zimmy]

definately isn't america. The criminal woudl sue for being thrown out of a car.

[stee]

definately isn't america. The criminal woudl sue for being thrown out of a car.

haha like Eddie murphy going mad in beverly hills cop coz hes charged with disturbing the peace by being thrown through a window.
"whats the fvcking charge for getting thrown out of a moving car? jay walking???"
cracks me up every time

[needmorestrength]

thats awsome

[BEER WHORE]

[QUOTE=GQ-Bouncer]Japan actually has an AWESOME police force & justice system, its actually cited as one of the best in the world & there conviction rate is somewhere in the 90's % .

I agree with what you saying though, I'd like to see tougher laws & enforcement imposed as well... sorta like Singapore, where the death penalty is mandatory for drug traffickers [/QUO


GQ do you think drugs should be legal ?

[boxingbean]

no way....i wouldnt make no money hahahaha

[NotSmall]

Awesome.

[GQ-Bouncer]

[QUOTE=BEER WHORE]

Japan actually has an AWESOME police force & justice system, its actually cited as one of the best in the world & there conviction rate is somewhere in the 90's % .

I agree with what you saying though, I'd like to see tougher laws & enforcement imposed as well... sorta like Singapore, where the death penalty is mandatory for drug traffickers [/QUO


GQ do you think drugs should be legal ?

I think marijuana & steroids should be legalized and regulated through the gov't - but that's a huge debate, what do you think?

[NotSmall]

I think marijuana & steroids should be legalized and regulated through the gov't - but that's a huge debate, what do you think?

Legalize marijuana? - Why exactly would you want to do legalize something that is a potent carcinogen both directly and by increasing tobacco usage and causes a host of mental and psychological disorders?

[MAXIMA5]

That cop is my new idol. What a badass. That was like a Segal movie.

[Johner]

Is that a cop with a shotgun in a BMW 5 series shooting at a stolen vehicle?

[Prime]

i wonder how much he has to pay on his life insurance cover

[stee]

He would be covered for death through his work insurance, but to be honest if it was in the UK I could'nt see the Police paying anything out because what he did is wreckless and would go against every Health and Safety policy there is.

[cfiler]

Totally awesome!

[Flagg]

Quality! Top stuff!

[bigpopapump]

Great video, we really need more cops like that.

[USfighterFC]

Japan actually has an AWESOME police force & justice system, its actually cited as one of the best in the world & there conviction rate is somewhere in the 90's % .

I agree with what you saying though, I'd like to see tougher laws & enforcement imposed as well... sorta like Singapore, where the death penalty is mandatory for drug traffickers

Thats because the crime rate there is ridiculously low for a developed nation. There is 5 times the amount of crime in New York City than all of japan.

[scriptfactory]

Legalize marijuana? - Why exactly would you want to do legalize something that is a potent carcinogen both directly and by increasing tobacco usage and causes a host of mental and psychological disorders?

Anything done in excess is bad for you, including steroids, tabacco and alcohol. The funny thing is the two that are the worst for you are the ones that are legal... go figure...

[USfighterFC]

Anything done in excess is bad for you, including steroids, tabacco and alcohol. The funny thing is the two that are the worst for you are the ones that are legal... go figure...

I dont know I think you can kill yourself with steroid abuse a lot faster than abusing cigarettes.

[scriptfactory]

I dont know I think you can kill yourself with steroid abuse a lot faster than abusing cigarettes.

You haven't seen people with pulmonary problems from chain smoking... Anyways, I've never seen ONE person kill themselves with actual anabolic steroids. Please note that I'm not talking about ancillaries (like clen and lasix.) Many people have killed themselves through cigarrette abuse...

[NotSmall]

Anything done in excess is bad for you, including steroids, tabacco and alcohol. The funny thing is the two that are the worst for you are the ones that are legal... go figure...

I'm not disputing that, my question was "Why legalize marijuana?" - why do we need another harmful substance made even easier to acquire?

[scriptfactory]

I'm not disputing that, my question was "Why legalize marijuana?" - why do we need another harmful substance made even easier to acquire?

My question is, "Why make something very harmful substance legal when there are less harmful alternates that are illegal?"

It's hypocrisy. Either make them ALL illegal or make the less harmful ones legal. I've never seen someone smoke a joint and get into a fight because he/she was high or kill an innocent bystander because he/she was driving high and yet this is a common occurrence with alcohol. Cigarette companies are LEGALLY allowed to put poisons into their products to make them more addictive but in countries where marijuana is legal they never say that it is OK to add poisons to bud.

[NotSmall]

My question is, "Why make something very harmful substance legal when there are less harmful alternates that are illegal?"

It's hypocrisy. Either make them ALL illegal or make the less harmful ones legal.
I've never seen someone smoke a joint and get into a fight because he/she was high or kill an innocent bystander because he/she was driving high and yet this is a common occurrence with alcohol. Cigarette companies are LEGALLY allowed to put poisons into their products to make them more addictive but in countries where marijuana is legal they never say that it is OK to add poisons to bud.

You have always struck me as a man of intelligence in the past scriptfactory but here you are trotting out the same tired old arguments that get brought up when the subject of legalizing marijuana is raised. What you are stating is an argument for the prohibition of alcohol and cigarettes and in no way answers the question of "Why should marijuana be made legal?"
You have never seen someone smoke a joint and get into a fight? - I have, I have also seen long term friendships fall apart as a result of marijuana-induced paranoia.
Also, how can you say that marijuana has not contributed to road accidents? - as far as I know roadside testing for marijuana is in it's infancy and is not widely used at present which is why alot of people opt to smoke and drive rather than drink and drive, it is highly unlikely in my mind that a psychoactive drug that impairs brain function and slows reaction times has not contributed to road accidents.
The fact that bud does not have any extra chemicals added to it is hardly comforting - it has been shown in studies (no,I don't have them to post) to be far more carcinogenic than tobacco anyway.

So leaving alcohol and tobacco to one side for a minute, explain to me "Why should marijuana be made legal?"

[NotSmall]

The fact that bud does not have any extra chemicals added to it is hardly comforting - it has been shown in studies (no,I don't have them to post) to be far more carcinogenic than tobacco anyway.

Found one:

http://www.sarnia.com/GROUPS/ANTIDRU.../cncrlink.html

[scriptfactory]

I don't ever use a substance (ANY SUBSTANCE including prescription drugs) without researching it first. I especially don't get into discussions on these boards without having at least a little knowledge about the subject at hand. Too easy to get owned by the knowledgeable people here.

You have never seen someone smoke a joint and get into a fight? - I have, I have also seen long term friendships fall apart as a result of marijuana-induced paranoia.

Chronic (hehe) abuse of marijuana can certainly cause big problems. I'm referring to the occasional user, just like I was referring to an occasional drinker.

There are clinical reports of marijuana-induced psychosis-like states (schizophrenia-like, depression, and/or mania) lasting for a week or more. Hollister suggests that, because of the varied nature of the psychotic states induced by marijuana, there is no specific "marijuana psychosis." Rather, the marijuana experience might trigger latent psychopathology of many types. More recently, Hall and colleagues concluded that "there is reasonable evidence that heavy cannabis use, and perhaps acute use in sensitive individuals, can produce an acute psychosis in which confusion, amnesia, delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, agitation and hypomanic symptoms predominate." Regardless of which of those interpretations is correct, the two reports agree that there is little evidence that marijuana alone produces a psychosis that persists after the period of intoxication.
http://newton.nap.edu/html/marimed/ch3.html

Also, how can you say that marijuana has not contributed to road accidents? - as far as I know roadside testing for marijuana is in it's infancy and is not widely used at present which is why alot of people opt to smoke and drive rather than drink and drive, it is highly unlikely in my mind that a psychoactive drug that impairs brain function and slows reaction times has not contributed to road accidents.

I've never said that it cannot contribute to road accidents. I'm merely saying that I have never seen it. Here in Germany they do test drivers for marijuana intoxication and recently a court ruled that you can't charge a person for a DUI when they come up positive for marijuana use. They said that 1) testing is way to inaccurate and 2) there is no way to really judge if a person's judgement was impaired by marijuana use. This doesn't apply, of course, if a person is stoned out of his mind and tries to drive but how many people actually try to do that?!

I know about half as many that smoke as I know people that drink on the weekends. The smokers have never been arrested for marijuana intoxication while driving however an extremely large percentage of people I know HAVE been arrested for driving drunk. Trust me, the German polizei don't mess around with people driving under the influence so if a "smoke and drive" person was going to be arrested, it would be here in Germany.

Again, I'm not saying that driving while high is a good thing. I'm just saying that alcohol causes more accidents per capita. Hell, I can take cough syrup containing DXM and it will impair my judgement to a higher degree than marijuana will...

The fact that bud does not have any extra chemicals added to it is hardly comforting - it has been shown in studies (no,I don't have them to post) to be far more carcinogenic than tobacco anyway.

I've seen studies that say that as well, but they also factor in cigarette abuse WITH marijiana abuse. You aren't going to tell me that you actually believe a casual pot smoker is going to get lung cancer before a casual cigarette smoker.

Given a cigarette of comparable weight, as much as four times the amount of tar can be deposited in the lungs of marijuana smokers as in the lungs of tobacco smokers. The difference is due primarily to the differences in filtration and smoking technique between tobacco and marijuana smokers. Marijuana cigarettes usually do not have filters, and marijuana smokers typically develop a larger puff volume, inhale more deeply, and hold their breath several times longer than tobacco smokers. However, a marijuana cigarette smoked recreationally typically is not packed as tightly as a tobacco cigarette, and the smokable substance is about half that in a tobacco cigarette. In addition, tobacco smokers generally smoke considerably more cigarettes per day than do marijuana smokers.
http://newton.nap.edu/html/marimed/ch3.html

If the debate were 1 tabbacco cig per day vs. 1 marijuana cig per day you would be right. How many people actually smoke one Marlboro per day, though? There are many, many people that only smoke a couple joints on the weekend...

So leaving alcohol and tobacco to one side for a minute, explain to me "Why should marijuana be made legal?"

That is easy. Because I want it to be made legal! Not that it matters, I can go to the Netherlands on the weekend and blaze legally every couple of months.

[NotSmall]

Chronic (hehe) abuse of marijuana can certainly cause big problems. I'm referring to the occasional user, just like I was referring to an occasional drinker.

Thankyou, so why make it more readily available?
(Nice pun BTW)

There are clinical reports of marijuana-induced psychosis-like states (schizophrenia-like, depression, and/or mania) lasting for a week or more. Hollister suggests that, because of the varied nature of the psychotic states induced by marijuana, there is no specific "marijuana psychosis." Rather, the marijuana experience might trigger latent psychopathology of many types. More recently, Hall and colleagues concluded that "there is reasonable evidence that heavy cannabis use, and perhaps acute use in sensitive individuals, can produce an acute psychosis in which confusion, amnesia, delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, agitation and hypomanic symptoms predominate." Regardless of which of those interpretations is correct, the two reports agree that there is little evidence that marijuana alone produces a psychosis that persists after the period of intoxication.
http://newton.nap.edu/html/marimed/ch3.html

Whether marijuana alone causes these problems or just triggers them in those that are already prone seems somewhat irrelevant to me

I've never said that it cannot contribute to road accidents. I'm merely saying that I have never seen it. Here in Germany they do test drivers for marijuana intoxication and recently a court ruled that you can't charge a person for a DUI when they come up positive for marijuana use. They said that 1) testing is way to inaccurate and 2) there is no way to really judge if a person's judgement was impaired by marijuana use. This doesn't apply, of course, if a person is stoned out of his mind and tries to drive but how many people actually try to do that?!

I know about half as many that smoke as I know people that drink on the weekends. The smokers have never been arrested for marijuana intoxication while driving however an extremely large percentage of people I know HAVE been arrested for driving drunk. Trust me, the German polizei don't mess around with people driving under the influence so if a "smoke and drive" person was going to be arrested, it would be here in Germany.

Don't the two sentences in bold above contradict one another? - It would appear that one of us is stoned scriptfactory - and it aint me!

Again, I'm not saying that driving while high is a good thing. I'm just saying that alcohol causes more accidents per capita. Hell, I can take cough syrup containing DXM and it will impair my judgement to a higher degree than marijuana will...

Again you present an argument against something else which in no way justifies a pro-marijuana stance.

I've seen studies that say that as well, but they also factor in cigarette abuse WITH marijiana abuse. You aren't going to tell me that you actually believe a casual pot smoker is going to get lung cancer before a casual cigarette smoker.

Given a cigarette of comparable weight, as much as four times the amount of tar can be deposited in the lungs of marijuana smokers as in the lungs of tobacco smokers. The difference is due primarily to the differences in filtration and smoking technique between tobacco and marijuana smokers. Marijuana cigarettes usually do not have filters, and marijuana smokers typically develop a larger puff volume, inhale more deeply, and hold their breath several times longer than tobacco smokers. However, a marijuana cigarette smoked recreationally typically is not packed as tightly as a tobacco cigarette, and the smokable substance is about half that in a tobacco cigarette. In addition, tobacco smokers generally smoke considerably more cigarettes per day than do marijuana smokers.
http://newton.nap.edu/html/marimed/ch3.html

If the debate were 1 tabbacco cig per day vs. 1 marijuana cig per day you would be right. How many people actually smoke one Marlboro per day, though? There are many, many people that only smoke a couple joints on the weekend....

The fact that it is a powerful carcinogen is all I need to know, I realise that this is in response to my statement that marijuana is more carcinogenic but whether you get cancer faster from tobacco or marijuana is of little importance to me because I would rather not increase my chances of cancer one iota so I opt to die from neither thankyou!
When you get diagnosed with lung cancer from smoking marijuana how much comfort will it be to you that your buddy who smokes cigarettes got his tumour six months before you got yours?

That is easy. Because I want it to be made legal! Not that it matters, I can go to the Netherlands on the weekend and blaze legally every couple of months.

LMAO - Eeeeeeeeeexxxactly!

[USfighterFC]

You haven't seen people with pulmonary problems from chain smoking... Anyways, I've never seen ONE person kill themselves with actual anabolic steroids. Please note that I'm not talking about ancillaries (like clen and lasix.) Many people have killed themselves through cigarrette abuse...

I have and so have others. And his name was MassWithClass.

[scriptfactory]

Whether marijuana alone causes these problems or just triggers them in those that are already prone seems somewhat irrelevant to me

It's like anabolics and "roid rage." Understand now?

Don't the two sentences in bold above contradict one another? - It would appear that one of us is stoned scriptfactory - and it aint me!

You didn't read what I wrote carefully. If you ACT HIGH you can be arrested. You can be arrested in Germany if you are driving with a 0.3 blood alcohol level and you are acting strange... Just the test alone doesn't prove anything. The test + acting stupid will get you arrested.

Again you present an argument against something else which in no way justifies a pro-marijuana stance.

I'm just saying, let me be an adult. If the government trusts me with alcohol, guns, and automobiles, I think a little marijuana isn't going to make the US any more dangerous...

The fact that it is a powerful carcinogen is all I need to know, I realise that this is in response to my statement that marijuana is more carcinogenic but whether you get cancer faster from tobacco or marijuana is of little importance to me because I would rather not increase my chances of cancer one iota so I opt to die from neither thankyou!

When you get diagnosed with lung cancer from smoking marijuana how much comfort will it be to you that your buddy who smokes cigarettes got his tumour six months before you got yours?

Do you know how many carcinogens you are exposing yourself to on a daily basis? Don't let a little weed scare you. Hell, if you eat enough broccoli it is carcinogenic!

Again, I'm not saying everyone should go out and get high, that is irresponsible. I'm saying, "Let me be an adult and make the damn choice for myself!"

[scriptfactory]

I should add that dust is carcinogenic. Isoprene is emitted by rubber and trees, among other things, and it is carcinogenic. Hell, isoprene is exhaled by humans! A poor diet is thousands of times more likely to kill you than smoking a joint and yet the government doesn't give a crap about that. Hell, a poor diet is more likely to give you cancer than a joint!

Look at the leading killers in the US. Heart disease. Cancer. Cerebrovascular disease. The major way to prevent cancer is to stop smoking cigarettes, stop drinking and straighten out your diet. You know what, those are also the major causes of death APART from causing cancer.

[scriptfactory]

I have and so have others. And his name was MassWithClass.

You are right. I can't believe I forgot about him. That was a couple years ago, right?

[USfighterFC]

You are right. I can't believe I forgot about him. That was a couple years ago, right?

I think its coming up on 2 years if I'm not mistaken. Hopefully that we will be examples to others what steroid abuse can do, as he said so himself always get blood work done.