Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. 06-10-2006, 08:49 AM #1
    Warrior's Avatar
    Warrior
    Warrior is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982

    This camera will be mine! Nikon D200

    Isn't she sexy?



    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-10-2006, 09:26 AM #2
    SVTMuscle*
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,379
    I think it would take me a minimum of 4 years to learn how to use that.

    How much is that bad boy?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-10-2006, 09:55 AM #3
    Warrior's Avatar
    Warrior
    Warrior is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982
    Quote Originally Posted by SVTMuscle
    I think it would take me a minimum of 4 years to learn how to use that.

    How much is that bad boy?
    A little better than $1600 for the body. My current flash and lenses should be good... I'm lookin' into my Sigma lenses now - there might be a conflict with the drivers for them.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-10-2006, 10:19 AM #4
    SVTMuscle*
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,379
    nice, im not into photography at all, but im lookin to buy a new camera in the new future, prob a slim Cannon
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-10-2006, 11:17 AM #5
    jstanier's Avatar
    jstanier
    jstanier is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    50
    I got a Nikon D50 at the moment, my first digital SLR! Having some great fun with it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-10-2006, 02:17 PM #6
    Warrior's Avatar
    Warrior
    Warrior is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982
    Quote Originally Posted by jstanier
    I got a Nikon D50 at the moment, my first digital SLR! Having some great fun with it.
    It seems my Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF and APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX are compatible with the D200. They have had a press release about needing a firmware upgrade or something... but it effects the HSM models only. Mine are apparently not HSM...

    Did you have any issues moving from film to your digital body? I currently have an F100 with those lenses and a SB-28 speedlight. I will have the D200 soon... not sure if I need to get some special digital-equiped lenses or mine will work fine. I do plan on grabing one of the Nikon 18-70mm AF-S DX f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED Nikkor Zoom Lens... going to need that wider focal length anyway...

    The SB-28 apparently won't support TTL, but I can work around that. At least until I break down and just get a SB-800
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-10-2006, 02:19 PM #7
    Warrior's Avatar
    Warrior
    Warrior is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982
    Quote Originally Posted by SVTMuscle
    nice, im not into photography at all, but im lookin to buy a new camera in the new future, prob a slim Cannon
    Canon bad, Nikon... gooooooood...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-10-2006, 02:23 PM #8
    scriptfactory's Avatar
    scriptfactory
    scriptfactory is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior
    Canon bad, Nikon... gooooooood...
    Canon's are decent for the average person who doesn't want to spend half a paycheck on a camera.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-10-2006, 02:56 PM #9
    Just t
    Just t is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    86
    thats a niceeeeeeeee camera!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 06-10-2006, 06:03 PM #10
    BIGswang's Avatar
    BIGswang
    BIGswang is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    247
    i have a cannon and i tried to get warrenty on the thing they wouldnt even fix it. and just to fix it alone is just as much as buying a new camera. I would never buy a cannon ever again they suck. Nikkon are pretty good
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 06-10-2006, 06:29 PM #11
    the_rebirth's Avatar
    the_rebirth
    the_rebirth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    773
    NICE NICE NICE! im about to get that one myself here shortly!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 06-10-2006, 07:02 PM #12
    ~fuelforfire~'s Avatar
    ~fuelforfire~
    ~fuelforfire~ is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    F_ucken Two Bitches
    Posts
    4,113
    hahaha you loser lol
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 06-10-2006, 07:34 PM #13
    Mizfit's Avatar
    Mizfit
    Mizfit is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    8,867
    Canon is better than nikon.. IMO
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 06-10-2006, 07:37 PM #14
    Mizfit's Avatar
    Mizfit
    Mizfit is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    8,867
    Quote Originally Posted by scriptfactory
    Canon's are decent for the average person who doesn't want to spend half a paycheck on a camera.
    Canon and Nikon both have Cameras for the avg consumer as well as those a little more advanced.

    You really have to know what your looking for, in order to make an adequate judgement.

    Truth be it both brands are comparable. - But on the more professional side, people have allegiances.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 06-10-2006, 07:45 PM #15
    SVTMuscle*
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,379
    Quote Originally Posted by scriptfactory
    Canon's are decent for the average person who doesn't want to spend half a paycheck on a camera.
    I dont kno sheet about camera's nor do i want professional lookin photo's i just want something that is small and can take pics so i guess a Canon is good for me
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 06-10-2006, 07:52 PM #16
    Mizfit's Avatar
    Mizfit
    Mizfit is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    8,867
    Quote Originally Posted by SVTMuscle
    I dont kno sheet about camera's nor do i want professional lookin photo's i just want something that is small and can take pics so i guess a Canon is good for me
    Canon makes professionial (EOS Etc) and consumer cameras hun
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 06-10-2006, 07:55 PM #17
    Mizfit's Avatar
    Mizfit
    Mizfit is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    8,867
    Quote Originally Posted by BIGswang
    i have a cannon and i tried to get warrenty on the thing they wouldnt even fix it. and just to fix it alone is just as much as buying a new camera. I would never buy a cannon ever again they suck. Nikkon are pretty good
    Cannon is a feminine hygine product waste management company..

    That might be why..

    Try contacting Canon next time
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 06-10-2006, 08:16 PM #18
    SVTMuscle*
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Mizfit
    Canon makes professionial (EOS Etc) and consumer cameras hun
    and the Rebel! I hear alot of good things about that one, but its too big for what i want.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 06-10-2006, 11:56 PM #19
    Warrior's Avatar
    Warrior
    Warrior is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Mizfit
    Canon makes professionial (EOS Etc) and consumer cameras hun
    Yeah, Canon and Nikon are the two big players. I think Reuters uses all the high-end Canon digital bodies these days. The guys I ran into in the Bulkans (Kosovo, Macedonia) were shooting with the latest Canon bodies - traders!

    Freelancers and National Geographic-type professionals are contantly goin' back and forth between which company produces the better product. Personally, I think they are both good - but when you have a few thousand in Nikon or Cannon fitted lenses and lighting you are pretty much commited to that brand - and easily become an avangelist of sorts

    I have never shot with the Canon bodies - Nikon never gave me a reason to look else where... the general feel, interface and quality is always spot on...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 06-11-2006, 12:53 AM #20
    scriptfactory's Avatar
    scriptfactory
    scriptfactory is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Mizfit
    Canon and Nikon both have Cameras for the avg consumer as well as those a little more advanced.

    You really have to know what your looking for, in order to make an adequate judgement.

    Truth be it both brands are comparable. - But on the more professional side, people have allegiances.
    I actually did go shopping. I was looking for a basic 5-7mp camera for about 200 Euro. The Nikon cameras (I think they were called Coolpix or something stupid like that) did retarded things like not including a viewfinder to justify the lower price. The shutterlag on the Nikon was like 1 second in "fast mode" or whatever they call it. The power up time was like 5 seconds! I ended up buying a Canon Powershot A540 for about 200.

    Every review I read had Canon > Nikon for the 200 Euro price range.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 06-11-2006, 12:56 AM #21
    J.S.N.'s Avatar
    J.S.N.
    J.S.N. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    is that camera a 35mm digi? that would be teh secks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 06-11-2006, 04:19 AM #22
    Mizfit's Avatar
    Mizfit
    Mizfit is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    8,867
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior
    Yeah, Canon and Nikon are the two big players. I think Reuters uses all the high-end Canon digital bodies these days. The guys I ran into in the Bulkans (Kosovo, Macedonia) were shooting with the latest Canon bodies - traders!

    Freelancers and National Geographic-type professionals are contantly goin' back and forth between which company produces the better product. Personally, I think they are both good - but when you have a few thousand in Nikon or Cannon fitted lenses and lighting you are pretty much commited to that brand - and easily become an avangelist of sorts

    I have never shot with the Canon bodies - Nikon never gave me a reason to look else where... the general feel, interface and quality is always spot on...
    Sandly once u make a commitment - u really don't change overe- the lense are almost or more expesive than the bodies and are not comaptible withe the competitor - suprised??? hahah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 06-11-2006, 04:23 AM #23
    Mizfit's Avatar
    Mizfit
    Mizfit is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    8,867
    True camera buffs- not just your avg consumer - have allegiances and they will not sway - i am Canon all the way and my opinion will not change unless there is some great technology that comes out that sets them behind the competition - highly unlikely
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 06-11-2006, 07:05 AM #24
    SVTMuscle*
    SVTMuscle* is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,379
    Quote Originally Posted by J.S.N.
    is that camera a 35mm digi? that would be teh secks.
    it's probaly both
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules