I, like the majority of the rest of you gym freaks, hate condoms for what they are. They dull the senses, they cause the penis to constantly go limp, they hurt to put on, they smell, they prevent some of us from orgasming and cumming, they prevent the dick from "feeling" the pussy and getting wet, etc. Recently in my little venturing expedition, I have accumulated a lot of research material regarding the truth about HIV transmission through reliable scientific sources on the internet and have came to a startling conclusion; that unprotected heterosexual HIV transmission remains extremly low, something the media does not tell us or want us to know. The vaginal juice contains extremly low amount of the HIV virus in HIV positive women, that not enough is present to perpetuate a transmission into the male genitilia, if the male does not have any open sores or lesions on his penis. The highest risk for HIV is through anal intercourse, in which the anal walls are extremly thin contrary to the thick walls of the vagina that is designed for penetration and birth. The condom companies make a lot of money from all of this media hype, that there is an AIDS epidemic out there in America...nothing could be further from the truth. Read on the links that I am about to provide and lets discuss this:
http://www.ucsf.edu/daybreak/1997/08/826_aids.html
http://www.libchrist.com/std/CDC.html
and tell me what you think about this; Just HOW dangerous can it really be for heterosexual vaginal sex if somebody does NOT have any lesions or sores present on the genitals?
Oh BTW I know this is my first post, and people may be suspicious that I am a troll looking for attention or something, but to be flat out honest with you guys, I have been at work (video store clerk) for 11 hours and counting, sitting on this chair with a TV and computer screen in front of me all day, im bored to shit, so I come to you guys to talk about STDs and just how dangerous is it really to not wear a condom.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by cj1capp
