
Originally Posted by
BgMc31
Genetics are essential to be a top bodybuilder, IMO. Just like genetics are essential to be tops in any sport. I have great genetics, just not for bodybuilding. I'm 6'4 and 305lbs (currently). I was a blue chip all american (football) coming out of high school in '91. I was 6'1 and 225lbs with 5% bodyfat. I could bench press 325, squat 440, and pull (deadlift) 495. I came out of college at a shade over 6'2 and 255 with 7% bodyfat. I could bench 470, squat 670, and pull 700. But I continued to grow after college to about age 25 and now I'm 6'4. Too tall for bodybuilding, plus my calves are disproportionately small (17", considering I have a 21" neck and 21" biceps), and have extremely long arms (84") wingspan. All these are not good for a bodybuilding physique, but it was great for a football player and strongman (which I currently compete in). So even before AAS use, I was a genetic freak... for my sport, but I could never be a successful bodybuilder, nor do I want to, LOL!
So to reiterate, genetics are essential to be tops at any sport. Genetics dictate height. So Shaq wouldn't be Shaq if he wasn't 7', and Ronnie wouldn't be Ronnie is he were 7'.