
Originally Posted by
BWhitaker
It could be an interesting case...similiar to the idea of napster. They only provided the service for which illegally download songs. As a matter of fact, the user was actually committing the illegal act. However, as a matter of law, the courts determined that Napster, etc were responsible as well. In your case, your clients could potentially be the ones violating the copyright laws, but you are providing the service.
However, this is definitely a stretch since the courts ruled this way for Napster as this was the exlusive purpose of the software. Your case, you do have valid research purposes. Also, it is not copyright infringment to turn something into class.