-
08-24-2008, 10:15 AM #1
What sort of cycles do you think they used during the 60's
Aka "Arnolds era".
Arnold, Zane, Columbo, Draper.
Specifically Zane. Did they "Cruise and Blast", do you think? Did they use on/off protocol?
-
08-24-2008, 11:22 AM #2
early to mid 70's were arnold, late 70's to early 80's was Zane...
But to answer your question, i dont recall hearing a lot of on/off protocol, much less the use of PCT...
-
08-24-2008, 07:25 PM #3
WIsh we could find out for sure what kind of cycles they did instead of guess. We could guess all day but they would only be guesses. Any of these pros ever admit to what kind of cycles they did and have it documented?
-
08-24-2008, 07:35 PM #4
-
08-24-2008, 07:41 PM #5
-
08-24-2008, 08:24 PM #6
-
08-25-2008, 01:29 AM #7
He must cruise on a crazy dose though, to maintain that weight.
I'm under the impression when cruising or doing long cycles without PCT, you risk the chance of ****ing your own natty system up. That means no natty test, and consequently, no sperm (Children).
These guys have children i believe, so this is what is confusing.
But as you say, it would only be guesses. We probably won't know for sure.Last edited by Maverick_J8; 08-25-2008 at 01:31 AM.
-
08-25-2008, 01:54 AM #8
The Arnold Schwarzenegger cycle
By. Mr.X
So, you like the way Arnold looks? Those big arms, that barrel chest, those biceps that are unmatched to this day! Let’s face it, Arnold was a god among men when it came to bodybuilding.Small bones and small waist allowed him to compete at a tiny 220lbs., but look like he was 250lbs.+ The man was just amazing.
Most guys want to know, what was Arnold on? Well, we have are brining to you the *********.com underground exclusive article about Arnolds cycle There will be minor changes. We will show you ’s cycle then we will show you what you should add to it, like aromatase inhibitors or SERMs and PCT. In Arnolds ’ day, neither aromatase inhibitors nor PCT was heard of or done, it just wasn’t a part of the equation. Almost 30 years later, we have a lot more knowledge of proper cycling and post cycle management.
Arnold Schwarzenegger steroids cycle:
Weeks
Primobolan Enanthate (Injectable)
Deca Durabolin
(Injectable)
Dianabol (Dbol )
(oral)
Week 1 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 2 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 3 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 4 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 5 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 6 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 7 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 8 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 9 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 10 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 11 1000mg / week 100mg / day
Week 12 1000mg / week 100mg / day
Week 13 1000mg / week 100mg / day
Week 14 1000mg / week 100mg / day
Week 15 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 16 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 17 800mg / week 80mg / day
Week 18 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 19 600mg / week 60mg / day
Week 20 600mg / week 60mg / day
BRIDGE
Week 21 30mg / day 200mg / week
Week 22 30mg / day 200mg / week
Week 23 30mg / day 200mg / week
Week 24 30mg / day 200mg / week
Week 25 30mg / day 200mg / week
Week 26 30mg / day 200mg / week
START CYCLE (1-20) AGAIN
Most new age steroid users will ask, where is the time off? Where are the anti estrogens? Where is the PCT? Where is the Testosterone ? Well, back in Arnold Schwarzenegger’s time, these things didn’t exist. People went on cycles and hoped their genetics would prevent bloat, gynecomastia and permanent testicular atrophy. Back until about 7 years ago, pyramiding steroid use was thought to be appropriate, only now we have found that it’s a waste of time because the half-life of the steroids don’t change based on dosage, so there is no point in the pyramid.
Heres what I found on another website this was an article about Arnold's cycle. Not sure where they ever got the info though.
-
08-25-2008, 02:04 AM #9
Same thing I've read.^
-
08-25-2008, 02:06 AM #10
Bridging on 30mg Dbol ??? Aswell as Test.
Damn.
-
08-25-2008, 11:27 AM #11
Schwinns !
-
08-25-2008, 01:58 PM #12Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 3,723
All those guys back in the 60's and 70's were using no PCT? How do they have no tits.
Lucky in the gene pool I guess
-
08-25-2008, 02:08 PM #13
they used very very poor ones
-
08-25-2008, 02:26 PM #14Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 3,723
They were jacked too, I think the build then is better than the build now. Bigger than a fitness model by 20-40 lean pounds but not to the freak status that colman and cutler have achived.
It will be intresting to see what people will be doing in the next 20-30 years as looking back at these guys cycles and wondering how they did it with that. What they will be saying about current body builders. The advancments in the medical field and pharmacuticals in the next 20 years will probably be simply amazing as we learn more and more about DNA research and maping out our own bodies.
It's amazing we have done what we have not knowing about the DNA structure of each of us. In a matter of 10 years we will probably all have our DNA mapped out in a file at our doctors office. The advancements will be greater than the advancments made with computers though the 80's and 90's (if you remember playing number munchers as opposed to PS3s and current PC games).
-
08-25-2008, 07:33 PM #15
S.A.R.M.s is coming! When, idk but hopefully soon. Probably gonna have to go to Europe to get it though, U.S. wont have it first as usual. Yeah i agree but dont think theres gonna be research into making steroids but research indirectly towards steroids like with S.A.R.M.s
-
08-25-2008, 07:42 PM #16
I think theres more than enough steroids out now to meet anyone and everyone's personal goals. The only think we need now is the same quality/strength steroids but with far less side effects and maybe better pct options to choose from. We've had nolvadex since before the 70's and today its still almost mandatory for any pct, think we need some upgrades in this department more than new steroids.
-
08-25-2008, 07:46 PM #17Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 3,723
There is Falsodex (SP?) that is out, it is just very costly. To run in it your PCT would cost you about 1.5k USD.
It destroys the estrogen receptor though, so the estrogen has nothing to bind too. The price will come down though the years. I was tempted to try it for gyno reversal as it destroys the receptor site, it would probably work wonders. But with no garantee and going under the knife for only 2k more, it seems like it could be a waste.
-
08-25-2008, 08:27 PM #18
with sarms you won't need pct, cause you'll never get shut down. Which is better, a better way to recover, and never needing recovery?
-
08-25-2008, 08:27 PM #19
^Not to mention the elimination of androgenic sides like hair loss and a blown out prostate^
-
08-26-2008, 04:41 AM #20
S.A.R.M.s? I think I'm missing something what does that stand for?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Need a clenbuterol source
Today, 01:14 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS