Ok i honestly do not get this at all. In the US steroids are looked down on and the majority of the people in the US are either overweight or obese. Lack of exercise and poor diet is the number 2 killer in the country, yet there hasn't been one death linked directly to steroids (saw a site that said 3 people a year but another said zero so idk)..anyways that being said obviously there are going to be less people doing steroids than the amount of people that are overweight/obese so the numbers are going to be skewed. but i honestly don't get how someone thats obese can tell someone that works out for enjoyment and does steroids responsibly that they have a problem? I think its ridiculous and i feel that the fact that people picture a needle and that they then relate to to heroin might be part of it, but it makes zero sense to me. There also isnt one scientific document liking steroids to all those side effects that you hear of them doing. Of course there are going to be side effects, every drug has side effects, but when you see all the side effects they always say "when taken in extreme dosages"....seriously give me a break, i can die from taking an extreme amount of multi vitamins and die, hell you can die from too much water.
Another point is that when people say steroids there putting a ton of different drugs into one word. Thats like saying the side effects for pain killers are .... and then you take every pain killer from aspirin to morphine and say that those are the side effects people will see. Is that going to be accurate? of course not obviously aspirin is going to be a lot safer than all the prescription pain killers...that being said there is no way you can compare a mild compound like testosterone to something like tren. I keep having to debate this and i just wanted to hear other peoples points to this