Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    RoadToRecovery's Avatar
    RoadToRecovery is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,542

    Chris Boeving Interview

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7qGv...eature=related

    Even a guy who is pro-steroid use needs to be educated a bit better. We need more articulate people to defend the world of steroids .

  2. #2
    RoadToRecovery's Avatar
    RoadToRecovery is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,542
    Bump

  3. #3
    awesome1's Avatar
    awesome1 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    in the kitchen
    Posts
    465
    what the hell was he talking about when he mentioned the mcdonalds coffee

  4. #4
    RoadToRecovery's Avatar
    RoadToRecovery is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,542
    Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants,[1] also known as the "McDonald's coffee case," is a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the U.S. over tort reform after a jury awarded $2.86 million to a woman who scalded herself with hot coffee she purchased from fast food restaurant McDonald's. The trial judge reduced the total award to $640,000, and the parties settled for a confidential amount before an appeal was decided. The case entered popular lore as an example of frivolous litigation;[2] ABC News called the case “the poster child of excessive lawsuits.”[3]

    Liebeck's attorneys argued that McDonald's coffee was "defective", claiming that it was too hot and more likely to cause serious injury than coffee served at any other place. Moreover, McDonald's had refused several prior opportunities to settle for less than the $640,000 ultimately awarded.[4] Reformers defend the popular understanding of the case as materially accurate, note that the vast majority of judges who consider similar cases dismiss them before they get to a jury,[5] and argue that McDonald's refusal to offer more than a nuisance settlement reflects the meritless nature of the suit rather than any wrongdoing.
    ....

  5. #5
    Hard.On's Avatar
    Hard.On is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    I seek Immortality
    Posts
    1,982
    I didnt watch the entire interview
    But I like this guy,

    This is how I think


    but that guy interviewing him is a loser
    I hate him
    Last edited by Hard.On; 03-30-2010 at 12:57 PM.

  6. #6
    awesome1's Avatar
    awesome1 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    in the kitchen
    Posts
    465
    yes i know what happened with the mcdonalds lawsuit but he was saying that it set a precedent about political correctness and that it relates to steroids ?

  7. #7
    RoadToRecovery's Avatar
    RoadToRecovery is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,542
    oh i get what your saying. It makes absolutely no sense.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •