Mother wins right to more than half of ex-husband’s £500,000 crash compensation payout as ‘her needs are greater’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1TUMg0xTH
Productive Member
Mother wins right to more than half of ex-husband’s £500,000 crash compensation payout as ‘her needs are greater’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1TUMg0xTH
Knowledgeable Member
There's kid involved and whatever is in print is never the full story.
Does this mean that he pays no maintenance or child support now?
Productive Member
Let face it her needs are greater. Do you realize how much designer clothes cost these days not to mention expensive foreign cars and tiffany jewelry.
American Bedoo
Would not happen in the USA
New Member
Yea, she would have got it all!Originally Posted by wmaousley
Knowledgeable Member
No, only about 80%-90%, he needs enough to buy food so he can continue working to give it all to her.
The system is defiantly set up to benefit the mother; Not necessarily the children per say but the mother.
Why is it assumed the kids are better off with the mother? Why is it not automatically 50/50 custody and each pay their way if she is a working mother also? Because there is a lot more money involved for the courts and attorneys when there is fighting involved.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote