Steroid profile section

**dec11** · 12-21-2011, 09:52 PM

is it high time this was re-done and updated? more and more people are advising based on outdated and inaccurate info on there.
wasnt it that dickhead anthony roberts that copy and pasted/wrote most of 'em?

**The Bear 79** · 12-21-2011, 09:58 PM

Agreed. The info I hav gathered over the yrs from knowledgeable Vets, with hands on exp, as well as my own hands on exp, 9 times out of 10 is completely different from the profiles.

**slfmade** · 12-21-2011, 10:41 PM

So funny Dec. I just asked about this in another thread, and someone directed me here. I remember years ago when everyone found out he was a fraud. It was when I first found this site and was just viewing as a "guest"...the shit really hit the fan when all that when down!!!!

**Hazard** · 12-21-2011, 10:46 PM

I feel they need to be updated but that stuff takes time..... I'm sure there are plans to update them.

~Haz~

**jimmyinkedup** · 12-21-2011, 10:53 PM

Its a huge undertaking. Id like to see some updates as well..

**dec11** · 12-21-2011, 10:55 PM

yeah, alot of work in it for sure.

how about a simplified 'AAS for Dummies' version, 9/10 dont need the scientific jargon?

**slfmade** · 12-21-2011, 10:56 PM

At least update the EQ thread so "you know who" would stfu!

**dec11** · 12-21-2011, 10:59 PM

Originally Posted by slfmade

At least update the EQ thread so "you know who" would stfu!

hahaha, good one.

would be an easy update:

'EQ, its shit'. the end.

**slfmade** · 12-21-2011, 11:05 PM

Originally Posted by dec11

hahaha, good one.

would be an easy update:

'EQ, its shit'. the end.

You mean it's not the ULTIMATE steroid !!! I thought it must've been the perspiration of god the way he made it sound. Shit...better go cancel my order with Bishop John Paul then!!!

**jimmyinkedup** · 12-21-2011, 11:07 PM

Originally Posted by dec11

yeah, alot of work in it for sure.

how about a simplified 'AAS for Dummies' version, 9/10 dont need the scientific jargon?

I had a similar thought . Most profiles everywhere are simply plagerized from either duchaine , llwellyn or roberts. The scientific stuff is great and all but the AA ratings are often rubbish when it comes to to real world results. Unfortunately most poeple dont realize what they measure or meanand mistakenly think higher = better gains. It time for some real world up to date where the rubber meets the road info on these substances.

I was thinking in the mean time starting a couple poll threads. The title would be the compound. The poll would consist of :
Size
Strength
Sides
Ancillary necessity
It would be clear thet it is soley to share your own experience and opinion on the substance and its effects - not debate or dispute others. The poll would give numerical totals for each category and the thread would allow people to comment and share their experience and opinion.

Thoughts? Additions to poll ?

**slfmade** · 12-21-2011, 11:10 PM

Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup

I had a similar thought . Most profiles everywhere are simply plagerized from either duchaine , llwellyn or roberts. The scientific stuff is great and all but the AA ratings are rubbish and people think they translate to real world results when in all reality thats not necessarily the case. It time for some real world up to date where the rubber meets the road info on these substances.

I was thinking in the mean time starting a couple poll threads. The title would be the compound. The poll would consist of :
Size
Strength
Sides
Ancillary necessity
It would be clear thet it is soley to share your own experience and opinion on the substance and its effects - not debate or dispute others. The poll would give numerical totals for each category and the thread would allow people to comment and share their experience and opinion.

Thoughts? Additions to poll ?

How could we guarantee the poll wouldn't be swayed by newbie's that haven't ever ran a cycle but say they have. You know it would happen. Some kid would come on and say anavar was a 10 for mass building or something stupid.

**dec11** · 12-21-2011, 11:10 PM

Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup

I had a similar thought . Most profiles everywhere are simply plagerized from either duchaine , llwellyn or roberts. The scientific stuff is great and all but the AA ratings are rubbish and people think they translate to real world results when in all reality thats not necessarily the case. It time for some real world up to date where the rubber meets the road info on these substances.

I was thinking in the mean time starting a couple poll threads. The title would be the compound. The poll would consist of :
Size
Strength
Sides
Ancillary necessity
It would be clear thet it is soley to share your own experience and opinion on the substance and its effects - not debate or dispute others. The poll would give numerical totals for each category and the thread would allow people to comment and share their experience and opinion.

Thoughts? Additions to poll ?

looks good jimmy, prob better stickied though. maybe add potential for water retention with some sort of scale? q's on water retention get asked alot

**jimmyinkedup** · 12-21-2011, 11:13 PM

Originally Posted by slfmade

How could we guarantee the poll wouldn't be swayed by newbie's that haven't ever ran a cycle but say they have. You know it would happen. Some kid would come on and say anavar was a 10 for mass building or something stupid.

I have thought of this as well. I think I know a way that wont happen.

**jimmyinkedup** · 12-21-2011, 11:17 PM

Originally Posted by dec11

looks good jimmy, prob better stickied though. maybe add potential for water retention with some sort of scale? q's on water retention get asked alot

Yeah im thinking each category would be like on a 1 - 10 scale ....
viewing results would giuve u the cumulative total of all that took it..
If we get the participation it could give the sum of the vast experience of the entire board...

**Macon_Bacon** · 12-21-2011, 11:44 PM

My .02 would be to put some type of disclaimer on the current profiles or at least some type of "under construction" notice. I should have noticed the profiles were written 6 or 7 years ago and mostly that I shouldn't give advice on compounds.

**Knockout_Power** · 12-21-2011, 11:55 PM

Originally Posted by slfmade

How could we guarantee the poll wouldn't be swayed by newbie's that haven't ever ran a cycle but say they have. You know it would happen. Some kid would come on and say anavar was a 10 for mass building or something stupid.

minimum post count maybe. Perhaps 2 or 3 dozen selected board members by the admin(s)?

**Knockout_Power** · 12-21-2011, 11:56 PM

and even if the profiles section isnt up to date or the "best" info out there, its obvious that the people being referred there are so far off the proper knowledge, that those profiles will undoubtably be 200% better than what they think they know

**evander87** · 12-22-2011, 10:38 AM

Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup

I had a similar thought . Most profiles everywhere are simply plagerized from either duchaine , llwellyn or roberts. The scientific stuff is great and all but the AA ratings are often rubbish when it comes to to real world results. Unfortunately most poeple dont realize what they measure or meanand mistakenly think higher = better gains. It time for some real world up to date where the rubber meets the road info on these substances.

I was thinking in the mean time starting a couple poll threads. The title would be the compound. The poll would consist of :
Size
Strength
Sides
Ancillary necessity
It would be clear thet it is soley to share your own experience and opinion on the substance and its effects - not debate or dispute others. The poll would give numerical totals for each category and the thread would allow people to comment and share their experience and opinion.

Thoughts? Additions to poll ?

Originally Posted by Knockout_Power

minimum post count maybe. Perhaps 2 or 3 dozen selected board members by the admin(s)?

That would be fantastic. The scientific verbiage confuses the crap outta me. Lose that and give real world results would be HUGE in helping people. Well those of us that do actually read the profiles and attempt to do research.

Kudos to the vets that would undertake this endeavor.