Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Obama Summit of Americas Prostitution Scandal

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,265

    Obama Summit of Americas Prostitution Scandal

    Got to love it.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...83D0E220120415

    A prostitution scandal involving U.S. security personnel in Colombia and an unprecedented regional push to end the isolation of Cuba threatened on Saturday to eclipse President Barack Obama's charm offensive to Latin America.

    In a major embarrassment for Washington at the Summit of the Americas attended by more than 30 heads of state, 11 U.S. Secret Service agents were sent home and five military servi***en grounded over "misconduct" allegations in a hotel.

    Prostitutes were taken to the hotel, according to a Colombian police source.

    The widening controversy was overshadowing a host of weightier topics at the two-day summit that began on Saturday.

    "I had a breakfast meeting to discuss trade and drugs, but the only thing the other delegates wanted to talk about was the story of the agents and the hookers," chuckled one Latin American diplomat in the historic city of Cartagena.

    Locals were upset about the bad publicity for their city, and the scandal was raising eyebrows around the region.

    "Obama's guards expelled in Colombia over prostitution - shame the gringos think that Latin America is a brothel and they act like it too," commented left-leaning Venezuelan political commentator Nicmer Evans via Twitter.

    Obama's rapprochement with the region - already undermined by the titillating headlines from Cartagena - also faces a rare display of unity among both leftist and conservative-run nations in Latin America in allowing communist-run Cuba at the next summit.

    Argentina's foreign minister said the final summit declaration was stalled over the issue of Cuba, with 32 nations supporting its inclusion in the next Summit of the Americas, but the United States vetoing that.

    "We have decided not to participate in future 'Summits of the Americas' without the presence of Cuba," said the leftist ALBA block of nations, founded by Venezuela's theatrically anti-U.S. president, Hugo Chavez.

    OAS UNDER STRAIN

    Unlike at previous summits, backing for Cuba has also come from Colombia, Washington's strongest ally in South America.

    Sunday's proceedings will add to strain on the Washington-dominated system of hemispheric diplomacy that is built around the Organization of American States but is struggling to evolve with changes in the region.

    From Havana, Cuba's former president, Fidel Castro, weighed in with a withering newspaper column about the OAS and its "guayabera summit" - a reference to the loose-fitting Caribbean shirts being worn by many heads of state in Cartagena.

    Making no reference to the scandal, Obama tackled head-on accusations he had neglected Latin America while dealing with conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and other faraway priorities.

    "We've never been more excited about the prospect of working as equal partners with our brothers and sisters in Latin America and the Caribbean," he told business officials.

    Obama also hailed the potential to boost trade between the "nearly a billion consumers" of North and South America.

    The reality, though, is different: China has taken advantage of perceived U.S. neglect and is now the main trade partner for various countries, including regional powerhouse Brazil.

    Running for re-election in November, Obama is also under pressure from domestic voters to show his foreign policies give priority to trade that creates American jobs.

    Latin American leaders are also pressuring the United States for an overhaul of anti-drug policies, including possible narcotics legalization as a way to take profits out of the trade.

    "Sometimes those controversies date back to before I was born," Obama said wryly.

    "And sometimes I feel as if in some of these discussions, or at least the press reports, we're caught in a time warp, going back to the 1950s and gunboat diplomacy and Yankees and the Cold War, and this and that and the other."

    OBAMA FIRM ON DRUGS

    Many in Latin America feel a new approach is needed to the drug war - and a shift away from hard-line policies - after decades of violence, in producer and trafficking nations like Colombia and Mexico.

    But Obama was firm in rejecting calls to legalize either growing or consuming drugs. "I don't mind a debate around issues like decriminalization. I personally don't agree that's a solution to the problem," Obama said.

    Colombian pop star Shakira brought a splash of showbiz to the proceedings by singing her national anthem at the start of the summit.

    Missing from the OAS' sixth such hemispheric gathering were Ecuador's Rafael Correa, who is boycotting the event over Cuba's exclusion, and Venezuela's Chavez, who is undergoing cancer treatment.

    Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff gave Obama an earful on U.S. expansionist monetary policy that is sending a flood of funds into developing nations, forcing up currencies and hurting and other rich nations' competitiveness.

    "The way these countries, the most developed ones, especially in the euro region in the last year, have reacted to the crisis with monetary expansion has produced a monetary tsunami," she said, as Obama listened.

    "Obviously we have to take measures to defend ourselves. Note the word I chose - 'defend,' not 'protect,'" added Rousseff, whose government's actions to curb imports have been decried as protectionism by some in the region.

    The host, President Juan Manuel Santos, is using the summit to showcase Colombia's new economic stability after decades of guerrilla and drug violence that scared off investors.

    Although seeking to position himself as a regional mediator - particularly between conservative governments and the anti-American bloc led by Chavez - Santos nevertheless weighed in to support Brazil's position in front of Obama.

    "In some way, (they) are exporting their crisis to us via the appreciation of our currencies," Santos said, referring to the damage done to local exporters as Latin American currencies gain strength. "I share President Dilma Rousseff's anxiety."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    63
    Phack, you're in South America, who wouldn't bang bookers and do drugs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    486
    the cheap secret service agent should have just paid his bill!! they would have all been fine probably,, but a cheap "fcuk" got them all in this mess now. lol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    19,486
    top to bottom the whole administration is a joke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Repost
    Posts
    7,433

  6. #6
    JohnnyVegas's Avatar
    JohnnyVegas is offline Knowledgeable Member- Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    5,962
    I don't think this is an administration problem. I think it is a Secret Service culture problem that probably goes back a long time.

    Funny the Secret Service will now be investigated because one guy tried to shove a hooker out the door with $30 and she didn't go for it. I don't know if she demanded more after the fact, but this is why they have ethics (morality?) clauses. They are not supposed to put themselves in embarrassing situations (like married agents cheating on their spouses with hookers) that could result in blackmail. Nobody with high security clearances should be involved in this sort of behavior.

    Prostitution is legal there, but aren't those guys required to follow US laws when abroad? For example, they cannot go to Japan and sleep with 13 year old girls.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Business as usual yeah?
    Posts
    4,078
    I love Clinton but that pic Hoggage is hilarious

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Business as usual yeah?
    Posts
    4,078
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	aeb7political-pictures-visit-columbia.jpg 
Views:	1598 
Size:	47.3 KB 
ID:	122159

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Dude Abides
    Posts
    10,976
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyVegas View Post
    I don't think this is an administration problem. I think it is a Secret Service culture problem that probably goes back a long time.

    Funny the Secret Service will now be investigated because one guy tried to shove a hooker out the door with $30 and she didn't go for it. I don't know if she demanded more after the fact, but this is why they have ethics (morality?) clauses. They are not supposed to put themselves in embarrassing situations (like married agents cheating on their spouses with hookers) that could result in blackmail. Nobody with high security clearances should be involved in this sort of behavior.

    Prostitution is legal there, but aren't those guys required to follow US laws when abroad? For example, they cannot go to Japan and sleep with 13 year old girls.
    I'm not too sure on the ruling, but it's irrelevant. I don't think they should get in legal trouble for banging some hookers in Columbia. What I am upset with is that they used our money to pay for the trip. I think simply firing the guys and making them pay back the cost of the trip would suffice.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    AZ Side
    Posts
    12,809
    This is why I don't pay taxes

  11. #11
    JohnnyVegas's Avatar
    JohnnyVegas is offline Knowledgeable Member- Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    5,962
    Quote Originally Posted by Honkey_Kong View Post
    I'm not too sure on the ruling, but it's irrelevant. I don't think they should get in legal trouble for banging some hookers in Columbia. What I am upset with is that they used our money to pay for the trip. I think simply firing the guys and making them pay back the cost of the trip would suffice.
    Yeah, I don't care if they get in legal trouble either. They could have their security revoked permanently which would ruin their future prospects. They had to be there to do their job, but we can expect them to be professionals and not put things like the president's travel arrangements in danger.

    I think this is a common thing, like other government shenanigans, and this time it became a publicity nightmare. Tip of the iceberg. Everyone seems to be having a great time partying on the public's dime. Well, everyone but the public.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,265
    Quote Originally Posted by Honkey_Kong

    I'm not too sure on the ruling, but it's irrelevant. I don't think they should get in legal trouble for banging some hookers in Columbia. What I am upset with is that they used our money to pay for the trip. I think simply firing the guys and making them pay back the cost of the trip would suffice.
    Agreed, its all these type of services and extras WE are paying for. You know we are only see 1/100th or less. That's why I get so pissed off when they talk tax cuts. Of always has to do with us having to cut but all the cuts need to start with them. This is why the deficit is where it is, not because of teachers, fire department or police.

    I don't care about what they do with their on money on their own time. This has been going on for a long long long time and we have always paid for it call me now it's worse than ever because now there are so many more involved.

    It's also the same with all their little pet projects did we pay for. How many millions of dollars does it take to figure out the slug slime is slippery? Hey spend millions and billions of dollars every year on projects that are just as worthless to make someone rich but everytime its us the citizens who they say need to cut back expenses. Most people just have no idea how many hundreds of thousands of these projects that are on every year they're worthless.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •