Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: guesses on my bf%

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787

    guesses on my bf%

    Here I was 15% this was taken about 2 months ago..I think I have improved
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ForumRunner_20120426_121646.jpg 
Views:	3328 
Size:	30.7 KB 
ID:	122376


    This pic taken just now
    Calipers says I am 9.5 % @200
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ForumRunner_20120426_121832.jpg 
Views:	815 
Size:	25.8 KB 
ID:	122377




    What do u think ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Standing Above Weakness
    Posts
    16,033
    Was the first taken with a caliper as well? I usually add a couple % to the caliper reading as they can be slightly off.. you look good man definietely see improvement. So maybe 12-13%? What are your goals?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,801
    please tell me you dont have a superman hat
    If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    Quote Originally Posted by Igifuno View Post
    Was the first taken with a caliper as well? I usually add a couple % to the caliper reading as they can be slightly off.. you look good man definietely see improvement. So maybe 12-13%? What are your goals?
    Well under 10% @225 would be my ultimate goal, I am well aware that I am aways from that, it comes in steps which I have learned. The biggest hurdle was going from 160 too 200 and keeping the same bf%. Im pretty sure I am going to have to start test/tbol to go the rest of the way. I want to just get to 210 first with just insulin and gh.
    Last edited by Razor; 04-26-2012 at 02:27 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    158
    You can see an improvement but I don't think your anywhere near 9.5% Have you tried a bod pod reading they are $25 here.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    Quote Originally Posted by phoenix44 View Post
    You can see an improvement but I don't think your anywhere near 9.5% Have you tried a bod pod reading they are $25 here.
    Never heard of it. Will google it..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    17,170
    Which thread is the pic of your readings in?
    NO SOURCES GIVEN

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    members section

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by Razr.

    Never heard of it. Will google it..
    It's pretty sweet looks like a big egg you get in it and within minutes you have an accurate BF that doesn't leave much chance of user error

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,801
    Quote Originally Posted by phoenix44 View Post
    It's pretty sweet looks like a big egg you get in it and within minutes you have an accurate BF that doesn't leave much chance of user error
    never used one but i've heard from other vets they arent reliable.
    If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    A Rock And A Hard Place
    Posts
    8,925
    Quote Originally Posted by Razr. View Post
    Here I was 15% this was taken about 2 months ago..I think I have improved
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ForumRunner_20120426_121646.jpg 
Views:	3328 
Size:	30.7 KB 
ID:	122376


    This pic taken just now
    Calipers says I am 9.5 % @200
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ForumRunner_20120426_121832.jpg 
Views:	815 
Size:	25.8 KB 
ID:	122377




    What do u think ?




    Actually you kind of remind me of Brandon Lee


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    flying from the ashes
    Posts
    3,966
    leg shot? hard to tell from that pic. i'd say 12 from that photo

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    Thx Aus, Ill post a leg pic tomorrow

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,899
    id say 12or so. its so hard to telli actual percent from pics especially when you get below 15

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pennslyvania
    Posts
    2,449
    Quote Originally Posted by Shol'va View Post
    Actually you kind of remind me of Brandon Lee

    That long flowing hair lol

    Actually i really wish i had hair like that razr. Now i shave my head and my brother nicknamed me "q-ball"

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pennslyvania
    Posts
    2,449
    im gonna say around 12% tho IMO

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    268
    I don't mean to hijack your thread bit do you think of those weight scales that do your bf through your feet and of coarse you put in your age and height. I think your bf looks really close to your measurement.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    2,110
    Quote Originally Posted by big88sub
    I don't mean to hijack your thread bit do you think of those weight scales that do your bf through your feet and of coarse you put in your age and height. I think your bf looks really close to your measurement.
    ? I think u may be confusing bmi with bf%, the bmi calculation using height weight age on scales is absolute bs, it does not distinguish between body fat, muscle, bone density ect.. U could be obese and be at 8%bf...

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    Quote Originally Posted by AnabolicBoy1981 View Post
    That long flowing hair lol

    Actually i really wish i had hair like that razr. Now i shave my head and my brother nicknamed me "q-ball"
    Haha ur funny man! Thanks though. Id rather have my hair than my muscles lol

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    268
    The scale I got is probably all bs then cause it tells me water retension values body mass body fat all that shit. Im glad I spent 100$ on some piece of shit when I can spend 5$ on bf pincher thing. When I first got it it told me I was almost 30% bf then I lost 20# and around20% bf but I'll look onto it a little more. It definitely says bf on it but it could be wrong.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    268
    I'm not hijacking your thread raz but this might be educational or even helpful for some.
    How Body Fat Scales Work And Why It's Important Body fat scales use a technique called Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis... or BIA for short. Very simply... A small and completely harmless electrical current is passed through your body. The electrical current passes more quickly through fat free tissue like muscle than it does through fat or bone tissue. So... The amount of resistance to the electrical current relates to how much fat-free mass a person has and their body density. Here's the first challenge... Like all body fat tests, body fat scales don't actually measure your body fat percentage. They determine your body density. The examiner (or the scales) then uses a formula to calculate body fat percentage based on body density. Here's the key... These formulas just predict your body fat. Unfortunately there is no one formula that accurately predicts body fat for the whole population. Differences in age, gender, ethnicity, body size, and fitness level all have a significant affect on the results. Most scales can account for some of the basic differences such as age and gender, but take the actual body fat percentage they give you with a pinch of salt. What does this all mean for you?Well, whether body fat scales measure your "true" body fat percentage or not doesn't matter! As long as they can accurately monitor changes in your body composition over time, that's all you need. Your body position, the amount of water in your body, your food intake, skin temperature and recent physical activity can all adversely affect the results of body fat scales. So...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,265
    Hard to tell due to it being further away than the first but you do look bigger and have abs showing so I'm guessing right around 10%+

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Carving Stone with Steel
    Posts
    7,787
    Quote Originally Posted by lovbyts
    Hard to tell due to it being further away than the first but you do look bigger and have abs showing so I'm guessing right around 10%+
    God blessed me with a few good features..ABS was not one of them...they are small in size compared to the rest of my frame...I've done everything to make them bigger...its never worked that much. Hoping more gh and more training will eventually solve this

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,265
    Me either and as usual I preach better than I practice but once you get the BF down like you have instead of doing reps, 100s of crunches or??? use added weight like a 35 or 45 lbs weight doing decline situps trying to max out 15 or less to build size.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    dont ask for a source thx
    Posts
    8,949
    you look good bro...but you can do ab exersices till your blue in the face bro but the only way to make them pop is to continue to loose bf by diet and cardio but your well on your way so nice work...

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,685
    You look good bro and I aint going to guess beacuse I suck at it.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Posts
    130
    This picture looks much closer to your test results than the pic in your log. I don't think you had very favorable lighting in the first pic. Regardless your looking damn good.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Dirty South, GA Coast
    Posts
    1,705
    ..30%

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    No Sources Given
    Posts
    5,408
    Not to highjack but to illustrate my frustration with bodyfat testing,

    I first got tested at my gym with the handheld bioelectic feedback BS and it came up with 20.9% by the way I am 6.1 and 196...So then I did the caliper test and this showed me at 15.9% which was a lot closer to realistic but still seemed a little high. So I took the 3 site readings and found that they run them with different numbers for different ages. I am 56 and if I plugged in 40 yrs then it was 14.1% plug in 21 and it drops to 10.4%. I did some research on this and found that AAS usage causes you to have thicker skin which in turn will cause a higher reading since you are measuring both skin and body fat between the calipers.

    Now the reason I say all this is that its my feeling that body composition using underwater weighing is considered the gold standard for a reason. With calipers and all the age variable equations, you never really will get an accurate reading (particularly if you are over 30) using an age calculation that accounts for the average musculature and skin thickness of MR average Joe Citizen. Since those of us who body build and cycle or blast and cruise clearly are not comparable to most people our age.

    If you are really concerned with your BF see if any universities in your area offer body comp using underwater wieghing.

    FFM

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    268
    I was just reading about electro bs bf weight scales and and they have a accuracy of around +/-5%. That's huge and pinched scales are like +/-2% that not as bad bit I just bought another scale that does your bf and BMI and all that shit and it said I am 197# at 28% bf. That is totally bull. Let's round it a little and say I'm 200# and 30% bf( which I'm not) that means I can loose 50# and I'd be 150# at 10% bf. This is totally wrong 7 years ago when I was 21 I was cut probably at 10-15% bf at almost 180# and I have gained about of muscle since.then. all my fat is on my mid section and that's not the only measurements that have grown. My bis are 2" bigger and my shoulders are about the same with very little fat on them. I'm not sure about my quads I don't remember those measurements. The math is all wrong. What do y'all think. I am going to buy some calipers tomaro to see what they say and I'm.sure it will be totally different reading.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •