Results 1 to 35 of 35

Thread: Does anyone ever seen someone using taser back to the police?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    568

    Does anyone ever seen someone using taser back to the police?

    I wish I could see a video where someone grab a policeman leg and tase it back...does anyone know if it has ever happen?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Tasers do not work quite like that. You would have to make a connection between the darts. Like a line of ppl holding hands and one on each end is holding a dart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    568
    So I guess my answer is that this has never happened...doesn't matter, I just think it would be fun to see it

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    20,517
    I'm sure somewhere it's happened. If a cops own gun has been turned against him I would imagine a taser could have. Whether or not its been caught on tape is a different matter......

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,497
    I saw a guy get Tasered in Dewey Beach by the police this past weekend, and while he was being tassed he asked the police why they were doing it like nothing was going on.

    Pretty boss move in my opinion

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    A world without islam!!!!
    Posts
    7,092
    in australia before a cop can carry a taser he has to be shot with it so he understands the full effect of this. Is this the same in usa?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    A world without islam!!!!
    Posts
    7,092
    What taser do american police use? In aus every taser has a camera attached to it so the police review board can look at every shooting.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Great State of Texas
    Posts
    680
    Quote Originally Posted by Euroholic View Post
    in australia before a cop can carry a taser he has to be shot with it so he understands the full effect of this. Is this the same in usa?
    Yes, most US police agencies require the officer to be tased in training prior to being issued one. Escalation on force.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,259
    Quote Originally Posted by Euroholic
    in australia before a cop can carry a taser he has to be shot with it so he understands the full effect of this. Is this the same in usa?
    In America we need un approval before we can tase.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    A world without islam!!!!
    Posts
    7,092
    Quote Originally Posted by Fcastle357 View Post
    In America we need un approval before we can tase.
    Ok mr arrogant

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Kuwait/Florida
    Posts
    3,518
    Quote Originally Posted by Fcastle357 View Post
    In America we need un approval before we can tase.
    WIN for you

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Euroholic View Post
    What taser do american police use? In aus every taser has a camera attached to it so the police review board can look at every shooting.
    I use the x26C for home defense. It has hooked darts that extend 15 feet and as Lunk indicated, BOTH darts must hit the perpetrator to complete the circuit and administer the "lightning".

    No, I am not in law enforcement, its a first line home defense option before more lethal options would be considered. I personally would NOT want to be shot with a taser. It looks painful as all hell.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by EverettCD View Post
    Yes, most US police agencies require the officer to be tased in training prior to being issued one. Escalation on force.
    Ouch. That would suck. I pass.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    I use the x26C for home defense. It has hooked darts that extend 15 feet and as Lunk indicated, BOTH darts must hit the perpetrator to complete the circuit and administer the "lightning".

    No, I am not in law enforcement, its a first line home defense option before more lethal options would be considered. I personally would NOT want to be shot with a taser. It looks painful as all hell.
    Why do you have less than lethal options for home defense? Castle doctrine, assume that anyone entering your house without permission is there to cause you grievous bodily injury or to kill you, and dispatch them with extreme prejudice. I doubt the intruder is carrying less than lethal weapons with him, or that you'd be afforded such a courtesy.

  15. #15
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    Why do you have less than lethal options for home defense? Castle doctrine, assume that anyone entering your house without permission is there to cause you grievous bodily injury or to kill you, and dispatch them with extreme prejudice. I doubt the intruder is carrying less than lethal weapons with him, or that you'd be afforded such a courtesy.
    Canada. He has no rights.
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by Euroholic View Post
    in australia before a cop can carry a taser he has to be shot with it so he understands the full effect of this. Is this the same in usa?

    My neighbor is a State Police Officer and he has told me that they had to be shot with a taser in training school. He said it hurt like hell too.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    I have used a tazer on a victim.. I mean friend before. They seem to work pretty well.

  18. #18
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    I have used a tazer on a victim.. I mean friend before. They seem to work pretty well.
    I laughed.

    reported though.
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,796
    double post

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,796
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I laughed.

    can you do me next?
    fixed

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^bahahahahaahahahah

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    Why do you have less than lethal options for home defense? Castle doctrine, assume that anyone entering your house without permission is there to cause you grievous bodily injury or to kill you, and dispatch them with extreme prejudice. I doubt the intruder is carrying less than lethal weapons with him, or that you'd be afforded such a courtesy.
    The Castle Doc. is not law, it's a set of principles. One must still justify use of deadly force and be able to prove fear for life. Use of non-lethal force is justifiable in cases where a home invasion has occurred but one cannot articulate a reasonable fear for ones life.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    20,517
    Quote Originally Posted by Fcastle357

    In America we need un approval before we can tase.
    Lmfao!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    I have been tazed several times. They are a very effective tool. I have read studies that claim 1/5 ppl on average have the ability to kill another human being even when faced with a deadly force situation. The majority of ppl choose flight over fight. The Tazer is an effective form of protection for those ppl who question or are willing to admit that they may not be that 1/5

  25. #25
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    I bet I could dodge a taser. Bet anything. I'll go out and do it right now. Fuk it.
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Deep Down South
    Posts
    23,624
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite
    I bet I could dodge a taser. Bet anything. I'll go out and do it right now. Fuk it.
    I triple dog dare ya!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    568
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I bet I could dodge a taser. Bet anything. I'll go out and do it right now. Fuk it.
    make sure u get a camera so u can put it on youtube

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I bet I could dodge a taser. Bet anything. I'll go out and do it right now. Fuk it.
    I'll be happy to test your theory

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather

    Why do you have less than lethal options for home defense? Castle doctrine, assume that anyone entering your house without permission is there to cause you grievous bodily injury or to kill you, and dispatch them with extreme prejudice. I doubt the intruder is carrying less than lethal weapons with him, or that you'd be afforded such a courtesy.
    Oh no! Quite the opposite. I have 15 firearms. My preference for a first line of defense would be a less lethal option such as the taser. I'd rather subdue, incapacitate, and bound a perpetrator before using a more lethal option. Perhaps it's just an occupational preference for me to avoid lethal force. I have a good security system, however, if that didn't deter an intruder, I'd much rather take him/her down with a taser and restrain them than being responsible for ending someone's life. Statistically, only 20% of people can pull the trigger ("fight") at the critical moment. 80% of people will actually flee "(flight response") as a first response.

    Yes, I have numerous lethal choices but I hope never to have to use any of them. If pushed into a corner where my life or someone in my family was threatened, I could use lethal force. It's not my first option but it is available.....and make no mistake, if that loud-ass alarm in my house didn't send an intruder running, I'm coming at him/her with a taser AND loaded firearm to defend myself/family.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite

    Canada. He has no rights.
    Lol.....with all the "strap" I have, they won't let back in that country now!!! Lol

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life
    I have used a tazer on a victim.. I mean friend before. They seem to work pretty well.
    Lol.....I would ask in what context, but I'm not so sure that question should be asked! Lol

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunk1

    The Castle Doc. is not law, it's a set of principles. One must still justify use of deadly force and be able to prove fear for life. Use of non-lethal force is justifiable in cases where a home invasion has occurred but one cannot articulate a reasonable fear for ones life.
    Agreed! If I can subdue instead of expire a life, that would be my preference, however, I will protect my loved ones with my life if necessary.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,497
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I bet I could dodge a taser. Bet anything. I'll go out and do it right now. Fuk it.
    You should do it sneaking into Dana's bedroom. two birds one stone

  34. #34
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Rwy View Post
    You should do it sneaking into Dana's bedroom. two birds one stone
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image9.jpg 
Views:	150 
Size:	27.6 KB 
ID:	143445
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,497
    lol touche

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •