Printable View
I know the discussion is "beating a dead horse," but I always like to hear people bring up different body builders and speculate on whether they juice or not (especially when they claim to be a natural bodybuilder, **cough Mike Ohearn**).
Jeff Nippard, natty or not?
Attachment 173225
No. Not natty.
But hey who knows right??
Lol enhanced as fuck
No chance is he natty. Look at the 3D side delts. Clear sign
That was my reason as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by MACKATTACK
Word!!Quote:
Originally Posted by m.hornbuckle
Yep he is a pin cushion.
AFAIK they play the Natty card because YouTube will demonetize their videos otherwise.
Up next:
The Buff Dudes!
Attachment 173231
No not natty.NONE of them except maybe That Scott Herman guy.
Does TRT count as natty?
I would think not. Per its description, I would think you would have to achieve that physique based off natural test levels. TRT would disqualify that. But I am not an expert!Quote:
Originally Posted by wellshii
I agree even if it was a minimal trt dose. If you can keep stable levels at 600ng/dl regardless of sleep, diet etc you have an advantage just there.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoldMyBeer
The top one is definitely enhanced. The second two look natural
I have to agree. The bio-avail is much higher on an optimal dose of TRT.
Yeah exactly. Not to mention the free test being higher. There's a guy on youtube that strictly was on TRT via legal prescription,
no problem hitting 335 for reps on the bench. Sure natural guys can do that,but really only the bigger dudes.
Us smaller dudes barely hit 225 naturally unless eating like a damn pig and doing strict powerlifting routines.
Everybody is natty if they say so.
Everyone is on juice(or at least cycles) and we all know it
Considering he is only 5ft5, I’d reckon he’s not on as much stuff as other bodybuilders.
What about everyone’s favorite natty, Mike O’Hearn?
https://forums.steroid.com/blob:http...a-7dceeec1c397