Results 1 to 24 of 24
-
03-03-2021, 10:15 AM #1
Would her internal organs and DNA bother you?
If you met the woman of your dreams, a woman with normal female genitalia, a soft voice with feminine curves, would you care that she has XY chromosomes, and that inside her abdomen she has two testes instead of ovaries?
The woman in the above video is a heterosexual woman who is entirely female externally. She has an androgen insensitivity, her body doesn't react to testosterone and so that's why her fetal genitals didn't develop into a penis, and why her voice sounds girly.
Personally it wouldn't bother me, I don't have a habit of cutting open my girlfriend's and checking what's inside. Oh and for what it's worth, the below beauty also has XY chromosones and an androgen insensitivity, you might remember her giving a topless lapdance to Arnold Schwarzaneggar in the movie True Lies:
Last edited by Fluidic Kimbo; 03-03-2021 at 10:17 AM.
-
03-03-2021, 01:54 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
- Posts
- 1,178
Wow Kimbo...
Never a dull moment with you...
Response to the thread question:
I have to quote Andrew Dice Clay here when he said, "Two tits, a hole and a heartbeat, is all it takes for me..."
-
03-03-2021, 02:12 PM #3
Ok, it's an androgen insensitive male. I've heard people say they think Ann Coulter is one too.
-
03-03-2021, 02:24 PM #4
-
03-03-2021, 02:40 PM #5
Male humans aren't born with natural fleshly vaginas that automatically lubricate in response to romantic/sexual arousal.
By your logic, you would gladly suck the penis of an XX chromosome person who has hypersensitivity to androgens and was born with ovaries and a penis (because she's female, right?). Would you want her to be cut first though before you suck it?
When romantic conversation leads to foreplay and sex, I'm not thinking about internal organs and DNA. Humans didn't even know about DNA up until about 70 years ago.
And even if I had a weird fetish where I anesthetise my girlfriends and cut open their abdomen, I probably wouldn't immediately realise that the small little ball thingie is a testicle rather than an ovary (not that there's a massive difference between the two human gonads anyway).
And if I could go back in time to when Jamie Lee Curtis was 18 and ejaculate in her vagina, I gladly would. I wouldn't wank for 3 days before it.
-
03-03-2021, 02:53 PM #6
-
03-03-2021, 03:18 PM #7
Okay let's say we define male human as follows:
Human with penis and the male gonads (i.e. testicles)
And we define female human as follows:
Human with vagina and the female gonads (i.e. ovaries)
A human with a penis and a beard and a deep voice is definitely a male irrespective of what's in his sack.
A human with a vagina and breasts and smooth legs is definitely a female irrespective of what's in her abdomen.
I think that you are irrational to place more importance in the internals than the externals. 99% of us never see the internals apart from surgeons and Mexican cartel members.
-
03-03-2021, 03:26 PM #8Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 4,648
I hate to throw this out there but there are also pseudohermaphrodites.
Also besides just XY and XX chromosomes we also have X, XXY, XYY, and XXXY chromosomes.
There exists more than just your standard male and female.
Akward for some to believe.Last edited by The Deadlifting Dog; 03-03-2021 at 03:34 PM.
-
03-03-2021, 04:10 PM #9
Holy crap I'm just reading here that they associate XYY with higher criminality (serial killers and so forth).
I reckon the XYY chromosomes make the person look different, which is fine unless the person lives in an antisocial neighbourhood where they are either bullied or made to feel like they're lower than everyone else. I can see how a serial killer would develop from such an environment, and I think my explanation is more likely than mere genetics alone.
-
03-03-2021, 04:12 PM #10
A man is genetically a man at a chromosome level just like a woman is genetically a woman at a chromosome level.
Now just because a woman is technically a woman, it doesn't mean necessarily that I'm going to treat her as such. The same isn't true for a man. If he appears like a woman, he's still getting treated as if he's a man.
-
03-03-2021, 04:15 PM #11
-
03-04-2021, 04:01 AM #12
Up until 1950, we didn't know what DNA was. So a human could have been born XY in 1930 with a vagina, breasts, soft curves, soft voice, etc., and the only way we'd know the difference is that they can't have children (but you get infertility with XX females too -- approximately 11% of American females aged 15-44 are infertile).
In fact if you can find me an XY female with a perfect vagina, teardrop breasts and soft curves that doesn't have periods then I might opt for that.
When I was spraying the barrel of my Desert Eagle airsoft gun, I turned it over to spray underneath, but then I realised that the barrel sits on top of the stock and you can only see the sides and top of the barrel. What's the point in painting something if nobody's gonna see it? If you told me that my girlfriend had 2 hearts, 1 lung and another organ similar to a spleen that was connected between the two hearts, then I might find it intriguing but I really wouldn't care. I'm not in the business of dissecting my girlfriends and figuring out how their innards work. I know that there's some people who you give them a radio as a child, and they end up taking a screwdriver to it and looking at all the parts, but some people just listen to the radio.
I think there must be something in your psyche that is reacting strongly to the word 'testicle'. It isn't a a very feminine word, it makes us think of hairy muscular men with low voices. If it was located in a skin sack distended from the vulva then I might understand why you find that unattractive. When it comes to internal organs in the abdominal cavity though... it's a maze in there anyway... our intestines alone are 15 feet long.
Since I'm a computer programmer, I might have a unique view on DNA. I see DNA as a set of blue-prints (e.g. measurements of parts), instructions (similar to a computer's CPU instructions), and settings (e.g. configuration files). If you told me that our DNA has a file "My Documents\sex.txt" and it contains 0 for female and 1 for male, but that there's another configuration file somewhere called "Program Files\Masculanisation\config" with an entry "React_Testosterone=false", then I won't have much difficulty understanding that the baby can come out female even though "sex.txt" contains a 1.
-
03-04-2021, 05:00 AM #13
-
-
03-04-2021, 05:40 AM #15
Here's another XY lady:
-
03-04-2021, 07:59 AM #16
-
03-04-2021, 11:30 AM #17
-
03-04-2021, 12:02 PM #18
yep, just threw up in my mouth.
-
03-04-2021, 02:17 PM #19
-
03-04-2021, 02:19 PM #20
-
03-04-2021, 02:37 PM #21
After reading this horseshit the politics forum isnt so bad after all
-
03-04-2021, 11:37 PM #22
-
Oh gawd, it’s nice to feel good enough to laugh at this bull shit
-
03-05-2021, 07:00 PM #24New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2021
- Location
- Bayou City
- Posts
- 21
That’s funny AF
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS