Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By Cylon357
  • 1 Post By Cylon357
  • 1 Post By Quester
  • 1 Post By wango

Thread: 2023 NFL Playoffs

  1. #1
    Cylon357's Avatar
    Cylon357 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    AKA "Nice Guy Cy"
    Posts
    3,533
    Blog Entries
    1

    2023 NFL Playoffs

    Open discussion thread here!

    My thoughts on and predictions for the games today:

    https://youtu.be/tTRYvT739h0?si=IXCvQt4Xn1P3pz8R
    wango likes this.

  2. #2
    Cylon357's Avatar
    Cylon357 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    AKA "Nice Guy Cy"
    Posts
    3,533
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quick Super Bowl pick:

    KC 38
    SF 24

    Yeah I said it

  3. #3
    Cylon357's Avatar
    Cylon357 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    AKA "Nice Guy Cy"
    Posts
    3,533
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Cylon357 View Post
    Quick Super Bowl pick:

    KC 38
    SF 24

    Yeah I said it
    It is possible that I am clue free when it comes to predicting scores...
    wango likes this.

  4. #4
    Quester's Avatar
    Quester is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NC Highlands
    Posts
    2,616
    Not sure brother but I appreciate that you appreciate the things I appreciate, Carry on Wayne
    Cylon357 likes this.

  5. #5
    wango's Avatar
    wango is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    3,516
    Though not playoff related - some interesting free-agent possible moves (could you see Derrick Henry on a team that’s already considered a contender?). And my oh my, Chicago, Caleb & where might Justin Fields land?

    What do you think, was Jimmy G’s “prescription drug” that was a performance enhancer (and got him suspended for the beginning of the season) TRT or HGH?
    Cylon357 likes this.

  6. #6
    Quester's Avatar
    Quester is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NC Highlands
    Posts
    2,616
    My guess is that it has to bee something that a prescription, even off-label, is invloved. So, just as along the line with what your thinking too but it has to be detectable in a very subtle way. They don't test for testosterone , they test the range, right? So, probably not a peptide? Maybe even something in the fertility range...probly to conspiratorial.
    The range thing is true though.

  7. #7
    Cylon357's Avatar
    Cylon357 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    AKA "Nice Guy Cy"
    Posts
    3,533
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by wango View Post
    Though not playoff related - some interesting free-agent possible moves (could you see Derrick Henry on a team that’s already considered a contender?). And my oh my, Chicago, Caleb & where might Justin Fields land?

    What do you think, was Jimmy G’s “prescription drug” that was a performance enhancer (and got him suspended for the beginning of the season) TRT or HGH?
    Quote Originally Posted by Quester View Post
    My guess is that it has to bee something that a prescription, even off-label, is invloved. So, just as along the line with what your thinking too but it has to be detectable in a very subtle way. They don't test for testosterone , they test the range, right? So, probably not a peptide? Maybe even something in the fertility range...probly to conspiratorial.
    The range thing is true though.
    I read the latest (2023?) NFL PED policy recently. It claims they test specifically for EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING specifically.

    Claims are that they test for testosterone, all the steroids , peptides, SARMS , SERMs, you name it. If it has been discussed on this board, it gets tested for.

    Now, they probably don't test everything everytime, so a little smart use and inside knowledge could let you throw a variation of the kitchen sink at your protocol and still test clean. But, I'm just speculating on that part.

    And you can believe that the random factor isn't so random.

    Finally, the PED policy lists penalties for testing positive, but also lists a lesser penalty for specific masking agents...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •