Trenbolone Enanthate ---why is this compound so much more expensive the fina and is it worth it?
![]()
Trenbolone Enanthate ---why is this compound so much more expensive the fina and is it worth it?
![]()
cause the powder is. lol a few reasons i suppose...one being less injections cause of the ester
not worth it then!
Last edited by 2timer; 09-22-2004 at 01:55 PM. Reason: injection I love injection!
If you look at how much you need for say a 10 week
cycle and the fact it only takes 2cc's per week of the
stuff compared to injecting 1cc ED for fina (tren act)
the price really is not all that different... Just figure it
out for yourself, i have along with a few others and it's
not that big a difference... You're just seeing the big
price and not thinking how long and how much less you
need of the tren ent compared to the tren act...
And BTW it's worth every **** penny...![]()
It is considerably more in powder form. It would be worth it to me.
Well just so try to explain what i mean, the place i have
in mind that have both versions of tren powders charges
roughly 50% more per gram for tren enanthate, but you
only need 400-500mg per week were with the tren ent
where with tren act you should be injecting ED somewhere
around 75-100mg so you would need 500-700mg per week...
The tren enanthate builds to very high levels in your body
after the 2-3 week mark so it requires less hormone to get
the tren to very high levels in your body...
So doing the math which one is really more expensive?
And BTW the tren act powder is cheaper then if you
went and bought finaplix-h pellets when you figure out
the per gram price too... tren enanthate is just a better
choice and if you factor everything in cheaper as well...
so let me get this straight, price not being a factor, the effects youd get from ed shots of tren acetate would be the same as bi weekly shots of tren enanthenate at the end of a cycle?Originally Posted by buff87
I found tren ent to be much more effective then tren act because
the level the hormone builds to after about 3 weeks... gains were
better for me, especially strength gains... no doubt about it... If you
were running a shorter 6-8 weeks cycle for cutting then tren act will
work great, but for longer cycles like 12 weeks or more you can't beat
going with the longer ester tren ent...
Originally Posted by Spoon
thanks man. was thinking of doing the tren act since i would also be doing ed shots of prop. hehe now i cant decideOriginally Posted by buff87
![]()
Give me the acetate any day of the week.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)