Results 1 to 40 of 44
-
01-26-2005, 12:40 PM #1
Has anyone used short cycle method?
I have done this once, even though board members suggested against this method. They were right, the cycle did not amount to squat. Has anyone cylced in this fashion and was actually successful? Does anyone here believe this is a good alternative to traditional 10-14 week cycles?
-
01-26-2005, 01:07 PM #2Originally Posted by gsxxr
-
01-26-2005, 01:11 PM #3
Yeah the European's do those 4-6 week cycles a lot, nothing much good comes of them, I wouldn't waste my money
-
01-26-2005, 01:22 PM #4Originally Posted by gsxxr
I am asking if anyone thinks it is as big of a complete waste as I do now? Or have they done it and back it?
-
01-26-2005, 01:30 PM #5
alot of people were i live do 6 weeks on 6 weeks off ,to much hassle with pct etc plus the gains and strength only come when your about too stop.
-
01-26-2005, 01:41 PM #6
Thanks 1-cent, gsxxr, and irish bulldog. I would like to see as many responses on how ludicrist this is for experienced users. Anyone else?
-
01-26-2005, 01:43 PM #7Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
Cycle design:
Cycles are assembled by, first, determining the end response characteristics desired, and assembling components whose AAS characteristics interlock together to produce that end response with a minimum of overlap, over the cycle timespan desired. Consider this cycle: Nandrolone phenylpropionate(EOD), tren (EOD), Winstrol depot((ED), optional Anavar (ED).
BassMuscle
-
01-26-2005, 01:49 PM #8
Isn't tren anabolic ? more so than test? how about winny isn't it more complete anabolic while anavar is more androgenic ? This is out of the exact same artilce you are quoting...
-
01-26-2005, 01:54 PM #9
Characteristics of AAS:
There are two clearly discernable characteristics of interest to BBers. Anabolic : muscle growth/hypertrophy. and Androgenic : strength, aggression, fat burning. Most AAS possess these two characteristics in varying ratios, and in various strengths. For example, Halotestin may be seen to produce a pure androgenic response, but no anabolic response. Deca , on the other hand, will produce anabolism with no significant androgenic response. Test produces roughly a 50 percent anabolic response, and 50 percent androgenic response. Then there is strength of response. Winstrol is a moderate, pure anabolic. Anavar is a moderate, pure androgen. Trenbolone is a very powerful androgen(80 percent of total response), much more powerful than the androgenic characteristics of test. Tren's anabolic characteristic(20 percent of total response), is weaker than that of test.
BassMuscle
-
01-26-2005, 01:57 PM #10
And Winny and Anavar are more androgenic then they are anabolic as I remember. But I could be wrong.
BassMuscle
-
01-26-2005, 02:01 PM #11Originally Posted by BassMuscle
-
01-26-2005, 02:03 PM #12Originally Posted by BassMuscle
-
01-26-2005, 02:04 PM #13
Anyone back short cycles? Or is that sub par for most?
-
01-26-2005, 02:11 PM #14
Short cycles are worthless IMO. I think the most effective cycles are longer, 20+ weeks.
-
01-26-2005, 02:15 PM #15Originally Posted by joevette
-
01-26-2005, 05:25 PM #16Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Short cycles are a very poor idea.
-
01-26-2005, 07:36 PM #17
i kno u couldnt run a long ester for 4-5 weeks and get much from it but if u were to run lets say prop 700mg a week along for 5-6 weeks with tren 75mg a day for 5-6 weeks. couldnt most people make decent gains with less side effects from that compared to doing a 12 week plus cycle? if u were to do a 10-12 week cycle with longer esters it wont kick in till about week 4 ne way. wouldnt ur natural test be shut down harder being on longer? im not saying short cycles r better just wondering about results vs side effects
-
01-26-2005, 09:36 PM #18
i think a 'short cycle' is 12 weeks...
What you are describing is a mini cycle.
And IMO..those suck.
-
01-26-2005, 10:14 PM #19Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- n.california
- Posts
- 160
several years ago i gained 25pounds on a six week deca only cycle.
-
01-27-2005, 06:04 AM #20
Done 7 week cycles for years and they worked, Now I run my cycles 29 weeks+ and they work GREAT.
-
01-27-2005, 06:54 AM #21
yeah and if u run 52 week cycle, results will be even better...
Yeah the European's do those 4-6 week cycles a lot, nothing much good comes of them, I wouldn't waste my money
-
you need to run 10 weeks min to see any good gains. you body can not build that much muscle in 6 weeks. you still need time to grow.
-
01-27-2005, 02:49 PM #23Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 317
Originally Posted by gsxxr
-
01-27-2005, 02:56 PM #24Originally Posted by gsxxr
-
01-27-2005, 03:00 PM #25
You could get some reasonable results if you only used bases (esterless AAS).
ie: Test suspention, bold base, tren base, nandrolone base, injectable winny, other orals
If you don't mind injecting 2x a day you could see results in a much shorter time, I wouldn't attempt it with anything other than bases.
-
01-27-2005, 03:07 PM #26Originally Posted by symatech
-
01-27-2005, 03:48 PM #27
can dbol be used for 3to 4 weeks in a week cycle!
-
01-27-2005, 03:53 PM #28
gsxxr, we need to find you a new avatar
-
01-27-2005, 04:15 PM #29
I have done short cycles and gotten good results. I think it just depends on the person and how they react to AAS.
-
01-27-2005, 04:36 PM #30Originally Posted by thebrakes
-
01-27-2005, 05:13 PM #31Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
01-27-2005, 05:14 PM #32Originally Posted by dr_ma
-
01-27-2005, 05:25 PM #33Originally Posted by symatech
-
02-01-2005, 05:16 AM #34New Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 7
Bass muscle,
that article you refer to is wrong, anavar is not an androgen, in fact it is as an almost pure anabolic . Hence why oxandrolone was suitable for children and women. Androgenic steroids ususally cause more visible side effects.
Going back to the subject of the post, I remember seeing an article which Dan Duchaine wrote claiming that after 6-8 weeks the protein storing effects of steroids start to drop as the body adapts.
Ill try an find the article on my pc just wondering if anybody has heard this before. If true that 12 week cycles are probably a bit of a waste....
-
02-01-2005, 09:20 AM #35Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 317
Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
and i don't know if 275lbs is huge, but it's not small. and sure, some guys have 50" chests, 36" waists and 18.5" necks like i do but generally not with less than a year of anabolic agents under their belts.
and indeed, my changeover to the darkside is slow because i have realized such impressive gains from previously legal stuff....and i intend to continue to incorporate the better PH/PS into future AAS cycles.
-
02-01-2005, 09:49 AM #36
I am 230 lbs and have a 48" chest, neck 18" same with arms... 275 on prohormones and prosteroids that were legal is a huge feat! Come on you do not know if 275 is huge??? How tall are you?
-
02-01-2005, 10:42 AM #37Originally Posted by Taoist
-
02-01-2005, 10:49 AM #38
I have done 4 6-8 week cycles or "mini cycles" as some would say
I gained 15 lbs on my first 8 week cycle, I used 100 mg of test building up to 300mg at the last 2 weeks, I used no pct and I kept almost all of it.
I think it has everything to do with what your trying to acheive, my goals over my last 3 mini cycles were to cut not gain massive size so in my opinion they turned out OK, currently I am on my 5 week of wini-tren (only) I did 2 weeks of tren ace ED and I am done with it am finishing with last 2 weeks of wini alone, I will PCT 1 week after I am done with CLEN and CLOMID. but so far so good I have lost 20 lbs so far in 5 weeks (was 250 now 230-225)(just to add also 18inch arms 50" chest, 5'11"), and am alot stronger than before the cycle 3 times as solid and alot more vascular, I also haven't used anything in almost 2 years so I think that is a factor, and that also I am not trying to get big. so to me it hasn't been a waste of time or money plus I have less than $200.00 into the juice
-
02-01-2005, 11:05 AM #39
JP1 the mini cycles we are talking about are 4 weeks and a pct.
-
02-01-2005, 11:22 AM #40
Sorry I thought you included it to be 6 weeks and less,and this one is 6 weeks I am going to use pct this time though, well then I can add that after 4 weeks I am doing well but not were I know I will be in 2 more weeks.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS