Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: stacking 17 aa steroids

  1. #1

    stacking 17 aa steroids

    Somone straighten me out.

    Why is it okay for someone to take 100mgs of anadrol but not okay for the same person to take 50mgs of anadrol and 50mgs of winstrol. After all it is not the actual steroid that is toxic to the liver but the 17 aa componet. Oxymethalone by itself would not be terribly tough on the liver neither would stanzonol right?

    Hypothetically if there was .25 mgs of the 17aa chemical in 50 mg of anadrol and .25 of 17 aa in 50mgs of winstrol why wouldnt somone be able to take both if on a regular cycle the used .50 of 17 aa in the anadrol.

    These are obviously hypothical numbers but would somone please help me unsderstand.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    I asked this very question, also taking a nominal amount like 50mg for 6 weeks would do no harm also. Let us see what they say and make sure we have our fire retardant suits on.
    Come on, bring it!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    bump

    i think it is ok to do two orals. i did d-bol and winny for 5 weeks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Quote Originally Posted by gsxxr
    bump

    i think it is ok to do two orals. i did d-bol and winny for 5 weeks.
    Not you... someone knowledgable.

  5. #5
    I wouldn't do it, but that's just because I don't like orals. Technically there shouldn't be a problem as long as you keep the total length down to ~6 weeks. I think running them at the same time would be healthier than running them back to back.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by joevette
    I wouldn't do it, but that's just because I don't like orals. Technically there shouldn't be a problem as long as you keep the total length down to ~6 weeks. I think running them at the same time would be healthier than running them back to back.
    That makes since to me... but lets hear from somone who is against it so we can see their reasoning.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
    Not you... someone knowledgable.
    thanks di-ck

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    It's not a matter of liver damage, cholesterol should be your main reason for concern.

  9. #9
    bump... for more answers from those who are against it

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    459
    I dislike how people present opinions with absolutely no science, or not even a sound theory behind them.

    I think that a full dose of Anadrol only is more stressful to the body than a relative half dose of winstrol and a half dose of Anadrol combined, BECAUSE Anadrol is more stressful to the body dose per dose. In other words, half a dose of anadrol is more harmful than half a dose of winstrol. However, if winstrol is damaging via different routes, the damage/stress could be synergistic, and therefore greater.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    there is only one way to tell.

    run the cycle and see what your sides are. i would get blood work done befor and after to check you liver.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •