Results 1 to 40 of 50
-
02-14-2005, 10:36 PM #1
If Deca is permanent, and Test is only temp ... why Test???
My brief experience (3 cycles) has been that the Deca /Eq/Winny results stay permanently, and the Test/D-Bol are VERY short lived. I'm 47, and in incredible shape, but I do NOT want to stay on AA's for the rest of my life. So why all the hype about Test Enth, Test Cyp, Fina, etc???? If you LOSE it all, why do it?? I have been very happy with the results from Deca/Eq/Winny. I have gone from 185 to 206 with 10% BF in one year. Am I missing something? Looking for guidance from you Pros ... :-)
-
02-14-2005, 10:40 PM #2
To loose it all on test has not been my experience. If anything while on Deca I would imagine you would loose quite a bit due to the water retention that Deca gives generally. But what do I know I am not in incredible shape. But I am 47 so whats your secret? : )
-
02-14-2005, 10:51 PM #3
Shoot I'm a Newbie, no secrets here. I havev worked out all my life, and been blessed with decent genetics. But I have read lot and tried to follow what I glean from this board. I did 400mg Deca EW/30mg Dbol ED/50mg Winny EOD and gained 20LB's in 10 weeks (lost 5LB). Not bad for 5'9". And I kept 15LB's, which made me happy. Being 47 and having people talk about you being a big boy all the time is awesome!!! I would still like to gain another 15 LB's or so of hard muscle, but I am leary of the Test. I want to keep this for years ...not weeks.
-
02-14-2005, 10:55 PM #4
-
02-14-2005, 10:58 PM #5
Did test only once when I was a kid, and didn't now a thing about PCT. But now it's caught my interest ... everyone says it is the best. What was your PCT?
-
02-14-2005, 10:58 PM #6
There is no reason why you can't keep just as much with test as long as you have proper ancillaries and a good post cycle therapy plan. At your age you may run into trouble going to many cycles without test.
-
02-14-2005, 10:59 PM #7
most of gains from deca is water retention, and with deca u keep the least amount of gains
-
02-14-2005, 11:00 PM #8
Originally Posted by Rickson
-
02-14-2005, 11:00 PM #9
You are using old information from charts that are extermely outdated.
-
02-14-2005, 11:02 PM #10
I'm sold. What should be my PCT?
-
02-14-2005, 11:09 PM #11
I do however disagree that all deca gains are from water. I don't hold nearly as much water from deca as I do from test it is just easier to control test bloat. I am quite a fan of deca I just think it works much better in conjunction with test and eliminates some of the problems that can come from a deca based cycle.
-
02-14-2005, 11:10 PM #12
Originally Posted by Oceans7
-
02-14-2005, 11:17 PM #13
Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 2,488
You can get it all at AR-R - click the banner at the top of the screen.
-
02-14-2005, 11:18 PM #14
Originally Posted by Rickson
Bovee TF, Helsdingen RJ, Rietjens IM, Keijer J, Hoogenboom RL. Rapid yeast estrogen bioassays stably expressing human estrogen receptors alpha and beta, and green fluorescent protein: a comparison of different compounds with both receptor types. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 Jul;91(3):99-109.
-
02-14-2005, 11:19 PM #15
Thanks peump ... outstanding info!!!
-
02-15-2005, 10:25 AM #16
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 308
-
02-15-2005, 10:27 AM #17
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 1,381
Originally Posted by absolutebob
Again, all that chart stuff is outdated information.
-
02-15-2005, 10:31 AM #18
Banned
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 2,584
Originally Posted by Oceans7
-
02-15-2005, 10:46 AM #19
I'm 42 and I hate test.
I'm on cycle now and not using any. Loving it...no probs whatsoever.
-
02-15-2005, 10:54 AM #20
u can keep the most of ur gains off a test cycle as long as u do ur pct and eat/train properly. i love test it will always be in my cycles. alot of newbes read those charts and get wrong information from it. i think it should be changed asap
-
02-15-2005, 10:57 AM #21
Originally Posted by absolutebob
-
02-15-2005, 11:29 AM #22
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 308
Originally Posted by ChefJ
-
02-15-2005, 02:34 PM #23
I couldn't agree more!
The one thing that is unpleasant about this board is everyone jumping on a newbie's ass & yelling DO A SEARCH!!!!
And then as directed you do a search & the information provided by the SEARCH COMMITTEE is bunk.
I bet it wouldn't take an hour for few vets/mods to update the effect chart.
-
02-15-2005, 02:40 PM #24
If you search the front page its all sh!t. If you search the posts and the educational forum its all in there..
-
02-15-2005, 03:06 PM #25
Originally Posted by SINCE73
, just do a search in the threads.
-
02-15-2005, 03:38 PM #26
If I was 47 and done having kids I wouldn't do PCT, I'd just go on HRT. If you do a cycle then switch to a HRT dose of test (100-200mg) and some HGH not only will you not lose any gains you could make some more.
-
02-15-2005, 04:06 PM #27
Originally Posted by dirtdawg
ya richt.....not!!.......... i think test can give you way more water retention!!
beside's my first cycle ever was deca only.......gaint about 9 kilo's kept 8 (went from 72K to 81K) so.....please.....just..k.ll that sh.t.!!
and indeed i think that with proper pct you can still keep much of ur test gains!Last edited by BIGGEST J; 02-15-2005 at 04:16 PM.
-
02-15-2005, 04:35 PM #28
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 62
My last cycle of test I only lost 3 pounds afterwards, and a small bit of strength. Gain/loss ratio was about 4:1 for me.
-
02-15-2005, 04:36 PM #29
Originally Posted by dirtdawg
-
02-15-2005, 04:42 PM #30
Originally Posted by BIGGEST J
-
02-15-2005, 04:46 PM #31
Originally Posted by Rickson
-
02-15-2005, 05:02 PM #32
Originally Posted by toolman
-
02-16-2005, 01:57 AM #33
Originally Posted by dirtdawg
Last edited by BIGGEST J; 02-16-2005 at 12:46 PM.
-
02-16-2005, 02:06 AM #34
Originally Posted by dirtdawg
-
02-16-2005, 02:40 AM #35
Are people actually suggesting deca gains being longer lasting than test now? What's this world coming to? Not only will test put more weight on you, but you'll keep a higher percentage of it as well.
-
02-16-2005, 05:02 AM #36
what is "ancillaries"???
And about the steroids profiles....since i started reading this board back in late 2003 the mods have been saying it needs update.....then WHY dont you update???
its a little lol to always say it needs update but never do it.....
-
02-16-2005, 05:04 AM #37
Why are you here? You just made a post in the lounge calling us all babies, now you're complaining about the information here? The profiles take HOURS and HOURS of manpower to research and write, they aren't just simply thrown together haphazardly and hope no one notices. They're coming, we have people working on them everyday and they will be up soon.
Originally Posted by indica
-
02-16-2005, 07:55 AM #38
Originally Posted by Rickson
-
02-16-2005, 09:33 AM #39
Originally Posted by indica
-
02-16-2005, 10:38 AM #40
Originally Posted by BIGGEST J
Bovee TF, Helsdingen RJ, Rietjens IM, Keijer J, Hoogenboom RL.
RIKILT Institute of Food Safety, P.O. Box 230, AE Wageningen 6700, The Netherlands. [email protected]
Previously, we described the construction of a rapid yeast bioassay stably expressing human estrogen receptor (hERalpha) and yeast enhanced green fluorescent protein (yEGFP) in response to estrogens. In the present study, the properties of this assay were further studied by testing a series of estrogenic compounds. Furthermore, a similar assay was developed based on the stable expression of human estrogen receptor beta (hERbeta). When exposed to 17beta-estradiol, the maximum transcriptional activity of the ERbeta cytosensor was only about 40% of the activity observed with ERalpha, but the concentration where half-maximal activation is reached (EC50), was about five times lower. The relative estrogenic potencies (REP), defined as the ratio between the EC50 of 17beta-estradiol and the EC50 of the compound, of the synthetic hormones dienestrol, hexestrol and especially mestranol were higher with ER, while DES was slightly more potent with ERbeta. The gestagens progesterone and medroxyprogesterone-acetate showed no response, whereas the androgen testosterone showed a very weak response. The anabolic agent, 19-nortestosterone showed a clear dose-related response with estrogen receptor but not beta. The phytoestrogens coumestrol, genistein, genistin, daidzein, daidzin and naringenin were relatively more potent with ERbeta. Ranking of the estrogenic potency with ER was: 17beta-estradiol >> 8-prenylnaringenin > coumestrol > zearalenone >> genistein >> genistin > naringenin. The ranking with the ERbeta was: 17beta-estradiol >> coumestrol > genistein > zearalenone > 8-prenylnaringen >> daidzein > naringenin > genistin >> daidzin. The hop estrogen 8-prenylnaringenin is relatively more potent with ERalpha. These data show that the newly developed bioassays are valuable tools for the rapid and high-throughput screening for estrogenic activity. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Lt
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)