Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Paper Anabolics
-
03-14-2005, 08:09 AM #1
Paper Anabolics
Anyone had any experience with them, know anything about their efficacy, etc?
-
03-14-2005, 08:12 AM #2
Yeah, they suck. The only good part about them is they're easy to ship international. The doses on the paper can range to 0% of the label claim to 130%, very innacurate dosing methods.
-
03-14-2005, 08:16 AM #3
Right on, kinda thought it was "too good to be true"
-
03-14-2005, 08:23 AM #4Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
I had good results with R.C.'s paper products, as has CutieFace. All other brands are garbage.
-
03-14-2005, 08:26 AM #5
Hooker, did you ever have them tested? More than one sample?
-
03-14-2005, 08:33 AM #6Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Nope. All of the lab tests I've done are posted on BB4L. The paper products I used were PaperDrol, and worked very well for me.
I wouldn't pay to get them tested, because now that I'm back in the US of A, I can get regular orals. When I was in NZ, however, paper was my only option to get through customs.
-
03-14-2005, 08:35 AM #7
Yeah, I was looking at R.C.'s stuff. I wonder how consistent they are however.
-
03-14-2005, 08:36 AM #8
Yup, thats the only reason for them IMO, to get them past customs.. if its all you have, its better than nothing.
Originally Posted by hooker
-
03-14-2005, 08:58 AM #9
RC's var and turinabol have been top notch. I have not had them lab tested, but with the gains I have seen I really don't need to.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS