Results 1 to 21 of 21
Thread: Should I Change It!
-
03-16-2005, 11:09 AM #1
Should I Change It!
heres what my cycle layout looks like its a lean mass cycle and being that eq makes you extra hungry and im liable to eat way too much while trying gain lean mass so i wanted to maybe change it up and see what you guys think. also wanted to maybe add masteron the last 6 weeks to shred up ill be dieting hard and will be on clen so my b/f should be low enuf by then to use it effectively so btw. these 4 cycles which one would you guys choose over the others. thanks guys this will be a good cycle for me im expecting great results so i need some input for reassurance
CYCLE 1
1-12 prop 120 eod
1-10 primo 200 eod (w/ 4 week frontload)
1-10 eq 240 e4d (w/ 4 week frontload)
1-12 var 60 ed
CYCLE 2
1-12 prop 120 eod
1-10 primo 200 eod (w/ 4 week frontload)
1-12 npp 120 eod
1-12 var 60 ed
CYCLE 3
1-12 prop 120 eod
1-10 primo 200 eod (w/ 4 week frontload)
1-10 eq 240 e4d (w/ 4 week frontload)
1-12 var 60 ed
7-12 masteron 120 eod
CYCLE 4
1-12 prop 120 eod
1-10 primo 200 eod (w/ 4 week frontload)
1-12 npp 120 eod
1-12 var 60 ed
7-12 masteron 120 eod
-
03-16-2005, 11:58 AM #2
im also running a clen /keto mix throughout cycle
-
03-16-2005, 12:00 PM #3
From what you said alone about masteron being perfect for you by then and eq making you too hungry...cycle 4 seems to be perfect for you.
-
03-16-2005, 12:21 PM #4Originally Posted by Angel of death
for the other guys i need some real responses to this i have been indesisive lately
-
03-16-2005, 01:55 PM #5
Bumpzilla
-
you know eq should be run 12 weeks
-
03-16-2005, 02:21 PM #7
#3 , run the eq 12 weeks and increase it to every 3 days IMO.
-
03-16-2005, 02:26 PM #8Originally Posted by 1victor
-
so then is your prop 14 or 16 weeks
-
03-16-2005, 02:30 PM #10
12 weeks
im starting the eq and primo 4 weeks b4 the test and var if i choose to do that cycle and ending the eq and primo week 10 prop and is weeks 1-12
-
ok i get it now
i like 3 but var is going to be big $$$
-
03-16-2005, 02:51 PM #12Originally Posted by gsxxr
what about the eq hunger though i dont want that to screw up my diet thats why i was leaning towards npp and i will also see more gains (strength and lean mass) with npp rather than with eq
-
03-16-2005, 03:55 PM #13
bumpero
-
03-16-2005, 05:00 PM #14
gotta bump need more critiques
-
03-16-2005, 05:22 PM #15
i go with #3 also, I personally don't get that hunger off of EQ. I love what it does but it does not make me any hungrier. For what you are looking for i think #3 is the one you want.
-
03-16-2005, 05:27 PM #16Originally Posted by BodyMechanic
so you guys like eq better than npp
-
03-16-2005, 05:28 PM #17
i personally rather EQ over NPP but you will find some that think otherwise.
-
03-16-2005, 05:31 PM #18
3 looks good in my opinion. i don't really get much gains off nandrolone deca . so why risk no gains with npp? jmo
-
03-16-2005, 05:32 PM #19
i read about npp and liked it and also deca and primo were always a good combo what i have read npp gives good strength and lean gains as where eq makes you lean and vascular
-
03-17-2005, 10:15 AM #20
bump for more comments please
-
03-17-2005, 03:43 PM #21
**** bumpzilla
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS