Age: 22
Height: 5'9"
Weight: 180-185
BF%: 13
How effective would a HGH-only cycle be?
Age: 22
Height: 5'9"
Weight: 180-185
BF%: 13
How effective would a HGH-only cycle be?
Wrong forum bro...but Unless you just want to cut a little fat and not gain a whole lot of size...then hgh isn't for you....go with igf...its cheaper and better results....but I would just stick to AASOriginally Posted by fanatic
Thanks man.
effective? Could be very...Just depends what your goals are.
repost this in the HGH/IGF-1/SLIN forum I'll be more than happy to answer any questions you may have there.
And read the post titles, 'Posting 101' for a laugh.
-LL
No prob....And besides..using HGH for anything under like 4-6 months is worthless anyway....What are you wanting to see out of a cycle?
you would notice the effect a lot more if you were in your 30sOriginally Posted by fanatic
I love growth. I have been on it for 4-5 months. Done a cycle during the time. It's great pct. I plan to do it for about a year. I can increase my calories and not gain fat and I sleep awesome on it. Since taking it I feel great.
I agree with this, needless to say at the correct dosage and money permitting a 22 year old can still benefit greatly from rHGH. When hormone maturity hits and growth plates are fused exogenous HGH is reduced. At 22 you would probably be releasing 1-1.5iu naturally per day. So by INJ 3iu you will certainly benefit...Originally Posted by MMA
HOW
activation of satelite cells. This means more muscle fibers will be activated and through hyperplasia you will be bettering your genetic potential. The major stimulant of this is IgF-1 hence Cdoggie's comment about it being more cost effective for a bbs purpose. The other benefits will be far more noticed by an older H user. I'm talking about the sense of wellbeing and so on. H on its own may not be the best thing for you but by cycling while on H you will not look back,
LL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)