Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. 06-06-2005, 06:28 PM #1
    Kristopher22's Avatar
    Kristopher22
    Kristopher22 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Watching Food Network
    Posts
    242

    Silly Tren Question:

    If Trenbolone Acetate is rated Anabolic 500 and Androgenic 500.... That is 400 times more Androgenic than Test, then why does it not have the same estrogenic sides as test? To me it should realistically be 4 x worse than that of test?? Simple confusion, set me straight. Cheers.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-06-2005, 06:29 PM #2
    AnaBolic_hOsS
    AnaBolic_hOsS is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    156
    Kris,

    Read hookers profile on Tren (in steroid profiles)

    Reguards,

    AH
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-06-2005, 06:37 PM #3
    Kristopher22's Avatar
    Kristopher22
    Kristopher22 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Watching Food Network
    Posts
    242
    Looking it up now Hoss! Thx!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-13-2005, 05:58 PM #4
    Two4the$$
    Two4the$$ is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,717
    Dude, your match is horrible. It'd be 5 times as potent, and I have the same question as you do, but you must have missed the part where it minimized the estrogenic sides and focused on the reality of progestenic-ness of tren . Man, you make decisions on this quality of home work?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules