Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. 06-28-2005, 03:52 PM #1
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453

    AAS effectiveness chart?

    I used to check the "effectiveness chart" over on steroid .com but I've stopped using it because from what I've read its pretty inaccurate.
    I was just wondering how you more experienced lads would rate Test E and Var (individualy) just by judging on your experience. Of course - using the categorys on steroid.com which are:-
    Strength
    Weight gain
    Fat/water loss
    estrogen levels (rather than "anti estrogen")
    side effects
    keepable gains
    use a scale of 0 to 5 as on steroid.com with 5 being higher/better.
    Cheers
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-28-2005, 04:22 PM #2
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    bump
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-28-2005, 04:30 PM #3
    Alpha-Male's Avatar
    Alpha-Male
    Alpha-Male is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    1,352
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanlgd
    I used to check the "effectiveness chart" over on steroid .com but I've stopped using it because from what I've read its pretty inaccurate.
    I was just wondering how you more experienced lads would rate Test E and Var (individualy) just by judging on your experience. Of course - using the categorys on steroid.com which are:-
    Strength VAR 2 TEST E 4
    Weight gain VAR 2 TEST E 5
    Fat/water loss VAR 4 TEST E 3
    estrogen levels (rather than "anti estrogen") NOT SURE ABOUT THIS
    side effects VAR 1 TEST E 3
    keepable gains VAR 5 TEST E 3
    use a scale of 0 to 5 as on steroid.com with 5 being higher/better.
    Cheers
    In caps, IMO
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-28-2005, 11:44 PM #4
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    Nice one, so those are kind of the values I was expecting from the things I've read. Be nice to hear from one or two more just to double check.
    The estrogen category I wanted to be changed from "anti estrogen" which would only apply to clomid and nolva etc (anti e's) to "aromatizing" and hoe badly a compound will aromatize if you know what I mean. So for example, Var would be either a 1 or a 0 because it doesn't aromatize and something that aromatized massively would be a 5.
    Ta
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-28-2005, 11:47 PM #5
    madflabby's Avatar
    madflabby
    madflabby is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    246
    Good to hear it. Their chart makes it seem like you'll lose everything after doing a test cycle.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-29-2005, 12:07 AM #6
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    Yeah - 1 star?! what the hells that all about.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-29-2005, 08:36 AM #7
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    bump anyone?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-29-2005, 08:55 AM #8
    Gaucho77
    Gaucho77 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    242
    Yeah I am with you on those being a bit skewed... only thing I can think of is that those numbers are rationalized without a proper pct included??
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-29-2005, 10:43 AM #9
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    Yeah - maybe, that would make more sense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 06-30-2005, 02:45 AM #10
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    hm, maybe the title of this scared everyone off?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 07-01-2005, 06:55 AM #11
    nathanlgd's Avatar
    nathanlgd
    nathanlgd is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    453
    Ok one last bump and if anyone wants to have ago at T-bol that would be great
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules