Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: drol vs. dbol
-
08-21-2005, 11:13 AM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 58
drol vs. dbol
I'm considering using an oral to jumpstart my next cycle. I'll be using 500mg sust for 12 weeks, still debating which injectable to stack with it, used EQ 400mg last time. I'm looking for mass/strength gains, so I am considering 4 weeks of dbol or drol. I'm 6'2 210 now. Are either of those orals really much harder on the liver than the other? Are the side effects worse with one or the other? I've also been thinking of running 12 weeks sust 500mg and 10 weeks tren 300mg a week. Opinions please
Last edited by redcell; 08-21-2005 at 11:25 AM.
-
08-21-2005, 11:32 AM #2
Anadrol is a little stronger, a little harder on the liver and more side effects.
-
08-21-2005, 11:36 AM #3
-
08-21-2005, 12:05 PM #4
Originally Posted by Spyder
theres got to be 10,000 threads compareing dbol to anadrol.the fact is that they are both different.
dbol was designed for protien synthasis
anadrol was made for anemics
two totally different purposes and functions
-
08-21-2005, 01:05 PM #5
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 58
So say you had to choose between one of these cycles, which one and why?:
weeks 1-12 : 500mg sust
weeks 1-10 : 400mg deca
weeks 1-4 : 30mg dbol per day
and of course all the proper ancillaries
or:
weeks 1-12 : 500mg sust
weeks 1-10 : 300mg tren
plus ancillaries
Keep in mind I have never used tren or orals. I want quality strength/mass/muscle gains. I gained 20 pounds on a 8 week 500mg/400mg Sust/EQ cycle and only lost 5. I'm sort of leaning toward the sust/tren cycle b4 I ever try orals but I would value your opinions
-
08-21-2005, 01:22 PM #6
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by DEVLDOG
-
08-21-2005, 01:24 PM #7
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 58
anemia is low red blood cell count
-
08-21-2005, 01:28 PM #8
Originally Posted by redcell
doctors are now using EPO for anemia,,oxymethalone is pretty much obsolete for this purpose anymore
-
08-21-2005, 01:35 PM #9
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by DEVLDOG
-
08-21-2005, 01:40 PM #10
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 58
I am guessing that the more red blood cells you have, the more nutrients and oxygen can get to your muscles? please correct me if I am wrong
-
08-21-2005, 01:50 PM #11
Originally Posted by europeman
-
08-21-2005, 09:17 PM #12
Originally Posted by DEVLDOG
-
08-21-2005, 11:48 PM #13
I find drol to be much stronger then d-bol with less sides and more keepable gains. I find d-bol to be pretty much useless.
-
08-21-2005, 11:54 PM #14
anadrol is much stronger and more toxic
-
08-22-2005, 12:36 AM #15
for amatures dbol is definately the way to go....later on in your cycling..you might want to change up to anadrol ...and switch your dbol and anadrol as you see fit...for example when i set up cycles i usually have the first 4 weeks dbol....take 4 off...then 4 weeks anadrol....instead of going back to dbol...that way your body gets a change....
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS