Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
09-05-2005, 09:07 PM #1
Better absorption through different injection sites?
Does injection site have any effect on the amount of a substance that makes it into your blood stream? For example, would shooting your delts give better results than shooting your glutes due to less body fat or simply just a better muscle for absorbtion? Has anyone experienced a noticable difference when changing injection to delts, pecs, or even quads from glutes?
-
the larger the muscle the better the absorption you will get.
-
09-05-2005, 09:14 PM #3
i think it is all about muscle size and blood flow to the muscle... i have heard calves r the worst... not only do they hurt, but blood flow to them is worse then other muscles...
-
09-05-2005, 09:32 PM #4Originally Posted by topvega
-
09-05-2005, 09:35 PM #5
calves seems crazy, glutes and quads seem best, as well as delts..that didnt give me problems
-
09-05-2005, 09:38 PM #6
haha calf injections aren't too bad, right now i rotate, pecs, thigh, calf, bi's , tri's.. i don't know what absorbtiopn i get, but w/e..
-
09-05-2005, 09:42 PM #7Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 102
Originally Posted by Jsik98
I read a thread the other day where a dude tested his testosterone reults from shooting in his glutes vs delts... he had 42% more test when he would inject in his glutes.
-
09-06-2005, 02:27 AM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- U.K wales
- Posts
- 1,087
i rotate through bis,tris,pecs and delts cant see a dif though
-
09-12-2005, 03:53 AM #9Originally Posted by r1sk
-
09-12-2005, 07:24 AM #10Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Read my deca profile.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS