Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Better absorption through different injection sites?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    649

    Better absorption through different injection sites?

    Does injection site have any effect on the amount of a substance that makes it into your blood stream? For example, would shooting your delts give better results than shooting your glutes due to less body fat or simply just a better muscle for absorbtion? Has anyone experienced a noticable difference when changing injection to delts, pecs, or even quads from glutes?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    the larger the muscle the better the absorption you will get.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Back from the dead.....
    Posts
    3,254
    i think it is all about muscle size and blood flow to the muscle... i have heard calves r the worst... not only do they hurt, but blood flow to them is worse then other muscles...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Charlotte
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by topvega
    i think it is all about muscle size and blood flow to the muscle... i have heard calves r the worst... not only do they hurt, but blood flow to them is worse then other muscles...
    There was a thread a few days ago on why you shouldnt inject in the calves, you can get serious complications!

  5. #5
    calves seems crazy, glutes and quads seem best, as well as delts..that didnt give me problems

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    472
    haha calf injections aren't too bad, right now i rotate, pecs, thigh, calf, bi's , tri's.. i don't know what absorbtiopn i get, but w/e..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by Jsik98
    Does injection site have any effect on the amount of a substance that makes it into your blood stream? For example, would shooting your delts give better results than shooting your glutes due to less body fat or simply just a better muscle for absorbtion? Has anyone experienced a noticable difference when changing injection to delts, pecs, or even quads from glutes?

    I read a thread the other day where a dude tested his testosterone reults from shooting in his glutes vs delts... he had 42% more test when he would inject in his glutes.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    U.K wales
    Posts
    1,087
    i rotate through bis,tris,pecs and delts cant see a dif though

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    649
    Quote Originally Posted by r1sk
    I read a thread the other day where a dude tested his testosterone reults from shooting in his glutes vs delts... he had 42% more test when he would inject in his glutes.
    Wow! I was actually hoping someone would bust out some statistics! So the good old booty is the best way to go, huh? That's def my most frequent injection spot, but that' interesting how much better it is than delts. Injecting delts seems to be quite popular.

  10. #10
    Read my deca profile.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •