Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
09-21-2005, 03:24 PM #1
why allways SUST + DECA...not just TEST + DECA
why is it that everyone stacks deca with sust for supposedly big mass ? Why not just test and deca...at the end of the day thats all sust is so why do people insist on using sust ? Not that i have anything against it but wouldnt taking the same amount of any kind of test... weather it be prop, cyp and using it with deca manifest in exctly the same results ?
-
09-21-2005, 03:34 PM #2
There seems to be a huge fascination with sust due to it being a multi ester variety. I think newbs always see this and think *TECHNOLOGY* it must be better, when in truth it just isn't.
-
09-21-2005, 03:35 PM #3Originally Posted by shortie
-
09-21-2005, 07:04 PM #4Originally Posted by needbigguns
-
09-21-2005, 07:10 PM #5Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Westchester, NY
- Posts
- 125
i dont know but i wrote a forum on what to stack with deca ....test e or sust,.... and the majority said test e
-
09-22-2005, 01:40 AM #6
The good thing IMO about sust is the prop in it.
I could start a cycle with sust ed/eod without having to kickstart my cycle with liver toxic orals anadrol /d-bol!
-
09-22-2005, 01:53 AM #7
I would rather run test e and prop then sust to get the same kickstart as you mentioned toenail.
and since when do people on here say sust deca anyway?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS