Question about adding EQ to this

[spittin' 'n cussin']

So what I am planning is real basic.
weeks 1-12 or 13 or 14 Test E at 500mg/wk or e6d.
i guess this would be the base of it, plus lots of food, gym, and sleep.

i am 24 yrs, 6'3" and about 195-200. i have experience with sus, omna, and deca, but didnt do really big cycles before (was in college and never ate right, i admit, and loved the attention of being blown up for a few weeks). now im out and working and am eating better than i ever have and can afford all the food i need. im a bad ecto too as my weight can tell you.

anyway my question is, what would be the difference between this cycle by itself and this cycle with EQ added at about 400mg/wk for the first 10-11 weeks?
would i gain more muslce during cycle?
would i keep more in the long run?
will muscles be harder?
will i gain less water weight?
any other noticeable differences?

fyi i am planning nolva and clomid blah blah blah, you know, thanks yall!

[New Juice]

you should run EQ for at least 12 weeks...I like 14 personally, but i like that addition to the test e. EQ will put on quality muscle that deca does without all the water...keeping muscle is all about the pct...but eq would help, considering your putting muscle on...

[sp9]

My exp is, gains are more easily retained. You will see more veins, ie vascularity, you will see slow but steady additional strength than just using test alone. Combining test and EQ in your shots will cut the BA and I am never sore from a shot.

[bigboy20]

eq is a good combination with the test. but it will make u hungry as hell. i agree with new juice i personally like runnin it for 14 weeks

[Swifto]

So what I am planning is real basic.
weeks 1-12 or 13 or 14 Test E at 500mg/wk or e6d.
i guess this would be the base of it, plus lots of food, gym, and sleep.

i am 24 yrs, 6'3" and about 195-200. i have experience with sus, omna, and deca, but didnt do really big cycles before (was in college and never ate right, i admit, and loved the attention of being blown up for a few weeks). now im out and working and am eating better than i ever have and can afford all the food i need. im a bad ecto too as my weight can tell you.

anyway my question is, what would be the difference between this cycle by itself and this cycle with EQ added at about 400mg/wk for the first 10-11 weeks? Personally, I'd run EQ for no less than 400mg/wk for no less than 14 weeks. This is due to the time its takes to kick in, as of its long acting ester Undeclynate.
would i gain more muslce during cycle? There are too many variables here. But, EQ is mainly used to attain more gains of quality and used effectively, in conjuction with the right AS, for cutting cycles. Its not much of a mass gaining AS, though some use it for its apparent increase in appetite.
would i keep more in the long run? Again, to many variables. This depends on diet/PCT Protocol/PCT compounds/genetics/training and rest. Like above gains of more quality are usually evident, so there isnt much water weight with EQ's use, so not much will be lost during PCT, if you follow?
will muscles be harder? EQ has been reported to harden ones gain attained with its administration whilst making the user more vascular and reducing bodyfat.
will i gain less water weight? Yes, but it depends what other compounds your using with it. If your using AS that aromotase and are very androgenic, water retention may infact occur. An AI, such as, Letro/Aromasin/Proviron/L-Dex or Arimdex can be used to reduce/prevent this occuring.

any other noticeable differences? Increase in appetite could be a positve/negative effect, considering your goals. It will also increase RBC and can be used effectively for endurance purposes. Its not that suppressive, but, will cause suppression/shutdown with prolonged use for prolonged peroids.

fyi i am planning nolva and clomid blah blah blah, you know, thanks yall!

Bolds.