Results 1 to 25 of 25
-
02-23-2006, 04:25 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 10
Pyramiding or Front loading a stack?
Can anyone suggest what is the better way to plan a course. I normally pyramid a stack, but have been told to try front loading the next cycle.
My only concern with this is I would expect it to be difficult to control blood and estrogen levels?
Is this so or am i talkin out me rear?
-
02-23-2006, 04:31 PM #2Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- In The Pink!!!!!
- Posts
- 424
My ? is this. You are worried about blood levels but you pyramid? I believe that you get more consistent blood levels with running the same dose week after week. I do believ in frontloading though. This gives the body a quick introduction to the drugs and if you research this there was a graph that showed that frontloading actually allows more stability in test levels. Good luck
-
02-23-2006, 04:39 PM #3Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 2,482
Don't recommend either. Tappering off is a good idea though. It helps me avoid the crash. I run the test for a couple weeks longer than the other coumpounds.
-
02-23-2006, 04:49 PM #4Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- somewhere
- Posts
- 2,738
if u want to keep blood levels stable u should avoid pyramiding..
-
02-23-2006, 04:51 PM #5New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 10
Tappering off the test will happen whether i pyrimid or front load. I had always been under the impression that slowing increasing amounts and then tappering off helps to maintain blood and test levels.
I will probably give the front loading a try then, just my concern was exposing myself to high doses right from the start rather than gradually increasing!
Thanks for you replies!
-
02-23-2006, 04:57 PM #6Originally Posted by mkrulic
I tried frontloading with EQ and I didn't see any advantage to it.
JohnnyB
-
02-23-2006, 04:58 PM #7
by any means when we inject any aas it pyramids itself automatically due to the esters & reales time so no need 2 pyramid
-
02-23-2006, 05:06 PM #8Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 2,482
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
-
02-23-2006, 05:13 PM #9Originally Posted by JohnnyB
Originally Posted by mkrulic
Originally Posted by mkrulic
-
02-23-2006, 05:24 PM #10Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 2,482
Originally Posted by Jayhova
Originally Posted by Jayhova
Originally Posted by Jayhova
-
02-23-2006, 05:28 PM #11
-
02-23-2006, 05:44 PM #12Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 2,482
Originally Posted by Jayhova
Originally Posted by Jayhova
-
02-23-2006, 05:53 PM #13Originally Posted by mkrulic
Originally Posted by mkrulic
Maybe if using long esters in a 8 weeker then you would want to but in a 14+ weeker its pointless, like when I used it...
Back to your statement MK, "to get the ball rolling." With short esters or even esterless you dont need to enhace that effect. They kick in within a week. If using long esters and contemplating a frontload I would much rather see someone kickstart their cycle with an Oral and keep a steady dose of a long ester...............
-
02-23-2006, 05:57 PM #14Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 2,482
Originally Posted by Jayhova
-
02-23-2006, 06:03 PM #15Originally Posted by mkrulic
PM sent buddy, all set...............
-
02-23-2006, 06:04 PM #16Originally Posted by mkrulic
-
02-23-2006, 06:43 PM #17Originally Posted by mkrulic
JohnnyB
-
02-24-2006, 01:23 AM #18
I always frontload a heavy ester... if you work out the math it shows blood androgen levels can spike much sooner - to get the effects of the hormones faster. Your body has ways to attempt to reach homeostatis and slow your gains even when pumping in large amounts of exogenous androgens (HPTA, testicular shut down, SHBG, ...)... so I would rather get the androgen levels up fast, get the cycle rollin' and into PCT and leave the endocrine system sayin' "Whoaaa - WTF was that!"
Example.... if I was going to do 250mg of TE every 3 days for 583mg per week I would begin with 500mg on day one, then 250mg on day two, 250mg on day four... and then 250mg every 3 days from then on... getting in 750-1000mg - about double maintenance dose prior at first half life (first 4-5 days after first shot)...
If you plug this stuff into the roid calculator you will see - using 250mg of TE every 3 days - blood androgen levels elevate and stabilize after 5 weeks. When you frontload like I mentioned above - they elevate and stabilize the first week... completely stable after week 2...
-
02-24-2006, 01:35 AM #19Originally Posted by Warrior
All good wording Warrior...........
I thought I was the only one with that link!!! I have a different link but the same calc. Took me FOREVER to input my entire cycle one day, but I did and it look appetising. Here is what I did:
Week 1-----> 1500mgs Test E and 1200mgs of EQ. For 13 following weeks I did 750mgs Test E and 600mgs EQ. I do have to say that I felt everything "kick in" after a mere 2-3 weeks. Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut gains come to such a quick halt at around week 10 or so!!! I know my body well and I typically start progressing slower at week 12+.
I really feel it was the frontloading that caused my gains to cease rather quickly. Maybe SHBG levels climbed quicker then normal locking up test . Due to that last cycle I"m trying something new in my next. We shall see..........................
Frontloading was one of those thigns that looked great on paper but didnt go over well with my body. Trial and error took care of that one, for me at least.........
-
02-24-2006, 01:53 AM #20
Yeah - that's a great program/link!
Today, I can't imaging not frontloading - I don't know... it just seems right. I would like to hear from more people regarding this... today I don't go over 10 weeks anyway. But I guess it would make sense that the gains would slow down >10 weeks since the body is quickly exposed to the superphysiological androgen levels at the first week of use... as compared to not frontloading and getting levels elevated several weeks later...
What if you jumped the cycle with some acetate/prop or orals - do you still see the same effect after week 10?
-
02-24-2006, 02:03 AM #21Originally Posted by Warrior
OK OK so we do see eye to eye on this one. I'm sure if I stopped anywhere from week 8-10 I would have like it more.
Originally Posted by Warrior
-
02-24-2006, 02:53 AM #22Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 2,222
Originally Posted by Jayhova
-
02-24-2006, 03:10 AM #23
SHBG could deffinitly put the curb to a cycle. Since you bring it up - isn't there a way to get blood work done while on that would measure free and bound testosterone levels as well as free testosterone ? We could compare the results to see how much exogenous use ends up getting bound as a cycle progresses...
I could prolly get this blood work next time I'm on... and I'll check and see if the two tests are available for me...
Check this out... according to this author, high levels of insulin can help lower SHBG... makes sense when you compare going on cycle with excess calories coming in versus going on with low/restricted calories - the difference is night and day as far as increased anabolism. Also interesting is how estrogen (and T4) is being linked to elevating SHBG... further supporting using anti-e's during a cycle...
DHT - are you referring to Winstrol ? That would be another thing for blood work comparing bound and unbound androgen level ratios...
-
02-24-2006, 10:46 AM #24Originally Posted by vitor
Ahhhhhhhh Vitor you love that proviron buddy.
Was actually contemplating using 50mgs of that with 20mgs of Nolvadex before deciding to go with 20mgs of exemestane. If it wasnt for what I have planned I would have taken a third out of my cycle and used the Proviron/Nolv combo...........
-
02-24-2006, 10:48 AM #25Originally Posted by Warrior
Its level are decreased by high levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Also, androgen levels decrease, and estrogen and thyroxine levels increase SHBG.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS