I'm not going to get into a long drawn out arguement about this, but let's touch on a few points (or lack thereof you make)
1. "Therefore you should not recommend a certain protocol that is not pertaining to the subject at hand and let someone experience (like myself) handle it."
1a. So obviously you are saying that I am not experienced in this area, is that what I am gathering? Let's move past that and get to the word "protocol" you used in that statement. I countered your statement with references to Letrozole and gynocomastia from Pubmed.com. If you go there, you will see the results from different studies done on both men and women with breast cancer which is the closest thing you will find to a study that is related to breast tissue and how Letro can abrogate it.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...=pubmed_docsum
What I don't understand, is that you are saying I am wrong for recommending a protocol that in itself does not exist, but when I bring factual studies relating to breast tissue/adipose/gyno that are the closest thing to a protocol pertaining to Letro and Gyno, you denounce it and make it sound like I should move over and let someone like you with such experience "handle it"!?
I'm sorry sir, but I don't agree with you at all on this.