I found this steroid rating chart online... some of them I think may be a little off but it's mostly correct... check it out
http://www.steroidworld.com/compare.htm
I found this steroid rating chart online... some of them I think may be a little off but it's mostly correct... check it out
http://www.steroidworld.com/compare.htm
http://steroid.com/effect.php
hey look i found one too
Both are outdated and inaccurate
i nominate big klg to build us a new, state of the art steroid effectivness chart
These charts have been posted at least 20 times already. Not only do they suck, but they SUCK.
i second that...Originally Posted by peump
![]()
would it even be feasible to try and make an accurate chart?
seeing how everyone responds different
Actually it wouldn't be too hard to do. It could be based on the A:A ratios and members experiences of the drugs.
This thread is worthless with out a up to date chart!!!
Lets make a new one???
yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But I just wanna watch.
Me too. Maybe we should consult THE ROSS on this oneOriginally Posted by novicenovicen
Originally Posted by peump
Me 2...!![]()
get it done
That's a good idea Bro!!!!Originally Posted by big k.l.g
one thing that must be included is what hormones cannot be taken by themselves. this would eliminate, or at least reduce, the "hey comment on my blank only cycle."
Well who is actually capable of lending a hand in this process?
I would do it but member help would be needed. Plus i'll be doing all the reseach. *groan*
Alright, well, anything in particular you would like to be researched by members?
Besides the obvious?
So one of the attributes listed should be...anabolic/androgenic ratio?
In that case I think
testosterone- 100
trenbolone- 500
Anabolic/androgenic ratio-
Potential to keep gains-
Potential for negative side effects-
Speed of which the hormone enters/leaves the body-
Fat burning effects-
Aromitization rating-
Progesterone rating-
Whatya guys think of those in the list? More than that but, just for startin.
Last edited by guest589745; 04-25-2006 at 10:20 PM.
I have all the A:A ratios.Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
I like:
A:A ratio
Keep gains
Fat Loss
Strengh gains
I dont think the first chart is that bad. Some of it is bs but it looks like other parts are right on.
Originally Posted by big k.l.g
We gotta put some kind of side effect rating though.....right?
I think the other progest/aromat ones would be good, so then you will know how to treat, deca induced gyno versus, test induced gyno. You could use it as a referance. Or am I mistaken?
Maybe price rating as well?
Well i'm not sure about price, in terms of prog/estro it could work.
Ok this is a common mistake. There is no deca gyno or test gyno, just gyno. Gyno can't happen w/o estrogen.Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
Yea, thats why I asked. I thought I might be wrong. Thanks.Originally Posted by big k.l.g
Do It Big
by price I meant, maybe price per ML perhaps? Like whats common.??
If i did it i would not go into price in detail. It would be like Price: cheap, 2 out of 10, availability High, low, medium, whatever.
Yea even that would be good.
across all the boards on the internet, there are charts, and they are all viewed as outdated and inacurate. It would be a good idea to create a new updated one, may
Should we just use all the types of AAS in the profiles section?
why not rate them based on drinkability? winny being the standard of course......
Could we use the first chart and just modify it? Would also love to see some bang for buck analysis on stacks...Know it would be a pain but really helpfull when picking cycles.
Hows it comin along?Originally Posted by big k.l.g
![]()
I'mstill thinking about it, if i do it i will take some time tho.
Do it man, you know that Winny is #1 for cutting. Nothing else matters. as long as you take winny you are gonna get cut so winny is #1.Originally Posted by big k.l.g
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)