Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 43

Thread: Good steroid rating chart

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    93

    Good steroid rating chart

    I found this steroid rating chart online... some of them I think may be a little off but it's mostly correct... check it out

    http://www.steroidworld.com/compare.htm

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the garage
    Posts
    1,406
    http://steroid.com/effect.php

    hey look i found one too

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Both are outdated and inaccurate

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the garage
    Posts
    1,406
    i nominate big klg to build us a new, state of the art steroid effectivness chart

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    ON, Canada
    Posts
    7,169
    These charts have been posted at least 20 times already. Not only do they suck, but they SUCK.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    M-I-YaYo
    Posts
    3,915
    Quote Originally Posted by peump
    i nominate big klg to build us a new, state of the art steroid effectivness chart
    i second that...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the garage
    Posts
    1,406
    would it even be feasible to try and make an accurate chart?

    seeing how everyone responds different

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Actually it wouldn't be too hard to do. It could be based on the A:A ratios and members experiences of the drugs.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,727
    This thread is worthless with out a up to date chart!!!

  10. #10
    Lets make a new one???

  11. #11
    yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But I just wanna watch.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    VA - Formerly OH
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by novicenovicen
    yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But I just wanna watch.
    Me too. Maybe we should consult THE ROSS on this one

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    somewhere in HELL !!!
    Posts
    2,090
    Quote Originally Posted by peump
    i nominate big klg to build us a new, state of the art steroid effectivness chart

    Me 2...!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    303
    get it done

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    Actually it wouldn't be too hard to do. It could be based on the A:A ratios and members experiences of the drugs.
    That's a good idea Bro!!!!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    one thing that must be included is what hormones cannot be taken by themselves. this would eliminate, or at least reduce, the "hey comment on my blank only cycle."

  17. #17
    Well who is actually capable of lending a hand in this process?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    I would do it but member help would be needed. Plus i'll be doing all the reseach. *groan*

  19. #19
    Alright, well, anything in particular you would like to be researched by members?

  20. #20
    Besides the obvious?

  21. #21
    So one of the attributes listed should be...anabolic/androgenic ratio?

    In that case I think

    testosterone- 100
    trenbolone- 500

  22. #22
    Anabolic/androgenic ratio-
    Potential to keep gains-
    Potential for negative side effects-
    Speed of which the hormone enters/leaves the body-
    Fat burning effects-
    Aromitization rating-
    Progesterone rating-

    Whatya guys think of those in the list? More than that but, just for startin.
    Last edited by guest589745; 04-25-2006 at 10:20 PM.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
    Anabolic/androgenic ratio-
    Potential to keep gains-
    Potential for negative side effects-
    Speed of which the hormone enters/leaves the body-
    Fat burning effects-

    Whatya guys think of those in the list? More than that but, just for startin.
    I have all the A:A ratios.

    I like:

    A:A ratio
    Keep gains
    Fat Loss
    Strengh gains

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Getting madcow treatments
    Posts
    16,450
    I dont think the first chart is that bad. Some of it is bs but it looks like other parts are right on.

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    I have all the A:A ratios.

    I like:

    A:A ratio
    Keep gains
    Fat Loss
    Strengh gains

    We gotta put some kind of side effect rating though.....right?
    I think the other progest/aromat ones would be good, so then you will know how to treat, deca induced gyno versus, test induced gyno. You could use it as a referance. Or am I mistaken?

  26. #26
    Maybe price rating as well?

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Well i'm not sure about price, in terms of prog/estro it could work.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
    We gotta put some kind of side effect rating though.....right?
    I think the other progest/aromat ones would be good, so then you will know how to treat, deca induced gyno versus, test induced gyno. You could use it as a referance. Or am I mistaken?
    Ok this is a common mistake. There is no deca gyno or test gyno, just gyno. Gyno can't happen w/o estrogen.

  29. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    Ok this is a common mistake. There is no deca gyno or test gyno, just gyno. Gyno can't happen w/o estrogen.
    Yea, thats why I asked. I thought I might be wrong. Thanks.

  30. #30
    Do It Big

  31. #31
    by price I meant, maybe price per ML perhaps? Like whats common.??

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    If i did it i would not go into price in detail. It would be like Price: cheap, 2 out of 10, availability High, low, medium, whatever.

  33. #33
    Yea even that would be good.

  34. #34
    across all the boards on the internet, there are charts, and they are all viewed as outdated and inacurate. It would be a good idea to create a new updated one, may

  35. #35
    Should we just use all the types of AAS in the profiles section?

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,299
    why not rate them based on drinkability? winny being the standard of course......

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    178
    Could we use the first chart and just modify it? Would also love to see some bang for buck analysis on stacks...Know it would be a pain but really helpfull when picking cycles.

  38. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    i'll be doing all the reseach.
    Hows it comin along?

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    I'mstill thinking about it, if i do it i will take some time tho.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    ON, Canada
    Posts
    7,169
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    I'mstill thinking about it, if i do it i will take some time tho.
    Do it man, you know that Winny is #1 for cutting. Nothing else matters. as long as you take winny you are gonna get cut so winny is #1.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •