Test Enanthate as a Birth Control?

[IIIIIIIIIIII]

SO, i heard test e is 99.2% effective as a birth control method, whereas the pill is only 97.8%, anyhoo..not that I would rely on this method... but just curious..

How long into a cycle of 750MG a week would it take for your sperm production to be non existant???

[topvega]

SO, i heard test e is 99.2% effective as a birth control method, whereas the pill is only 97.8%, anyhoo..not that I would rely on this method... but just curious..

How long into a cycle of 750MG a week would it take for your sperm production to be non existant???

Where did u get your data? Somehow i doubt it's accurate.... There are plenty of stories on here about bro's knocking their girls up while on cycle...

[IIIIIIIIIIII]

'A few years ago, the Lancet Medical Journal of England reported that they found testosterone (the proto-type anabolic steroid ) to be a remarkably effective form of male birth control. Researchers conducted a 12 month study which included 270 men and determined that weekly injections of the hormone testosterone were 'safe, stable, and effective.' They dis-covered that weekly testosterone injections had a success rate of 99.2% as a birth control method. That makes it more effective than the birth control pill (97%) and much more effective than condoms (88%). The study also revealed that the effects of the contraceptive injections were entirely reversible upon discontinu-ing administration of the drug and that the testosterone injec-tions produced minimal side effects

[Anabolios]

i heard that too but it cant be accurate as many pregnancies have occured on cycle

hollaaaaaaaaa

[topvega]

'A few years ago, the Lancet Medical Journal of England reported that they found testosterone (the proto-type anabolic steroid) to be a remarkably effective form of male birth control. Researchers conducted a 12 month study which included 270 men and determined that weekly injections of the hormone testosterone were 'safe, stable, and effective.' They dis-covered that weekly testosterone injections had a success rate of 99.2% as a birth control method. That makes it more effective than the birth control pill (97%) and much more effective than condoms (88%). The study also revealed that the effects of the contraceptive injections were entirely reversible upon discontinu-ing administration of the drug and that the testosterone injec-tions produced minimal side effects

I wld be curious to know what kind of dosage and if they did any pct after they stopped injections... interesting though

[Stumbo]

Yeah, i wondered this for a while too.

I think i want to get a sperm cell count, my BC, and my girlfriends BC, and me pulling out, should be plenty of protection.....

[magic32]

SO, i heard test e is 99.2% effective as a birth control method, whereas the pill is only 97.8%, anyhoo..not that I would rely on this method... but just curious..

How long into a cycle of 750MG a week would it take for your sperm production to be non existant???

This particular chunk of banal data has been propagated for years, often weaseling it's way into the very defining profile of the compound itself. It ubiquitously appears in numerous threads having survived as presumptive lore on multiple sites including:
http://www.steroid.com/82.php
http://www.steroid4sale.com/descript...enanthate.html
http://www.buysteroids.org/profiles/testosteroneent.htm

Conveniently, this trite information merely references an alleged study that is always described as "reported". This is quite troubling as many aas users attest to not experiencing said effect, and often the diametric opposite...impregnation.

Unfortunately, (and again conveniently) as mentioned above by other members we have no dosage to go by, due the absence of this inscrutably "reported" research. And though many, including myself have performed enumerative searches for this unobtainable grail it remains at large, and I incredulous.

Its indoctrination can be traced to the bodybuilding magazine Muscle Media 2000, June July 1993 on page 45. However, each account phantomly yields the exact same information, echoed repeatedly by Hitchcock’s raven…”Never more, never more!” Virtually as surreal is the almost eerie consistency of its adeptly nebulous prologue, “A few years ago…”. Come on! That’s only a degree away from “Once upon a time”!

Such fugitiveness, evokes more than a questioning of veracity, but challenges its very existence. This conjecture directly parallels other supposed answer holding creatures like Big Foot, Nessie, and Yeti (the Abominable Snowman), all of which seem to fall innocuously into the same mundane classification of “reported”.

At one point due no doubt to internet frustration, I actually joined the Lancet (via the free and albeit limited registrant status), at http://www.thelancet.com/ and scoured their medical journal database to no avail.

As Rod Serling would say, "I’ve filed this one (at least the study, not the possibility of said effects) under ‘A’ for adjunct apparition…in the Twilight Zone".

M.

[Smart@$$]

If you believe everything you read, be prepared for a baby. I know I was on 600mg of test cypionate 400mg of deca durabolin .

[Booz]

sorry but in my case that is totall and utter rubbish...............
i have fathered 2 of my 4 children whilst running gear that included test e............

[Swifto]

sorry but in my case that is totall and utter rubbish...............
i have fathered 2 of my 4 children whilst running gear that included test e............

Nuff said.

There are meny members on here who have had children when running various androgens.

[HORSE~]

I was on test when I fathered my youngest daughter 8 years old now

So for me that's all a buch of BS

[Stumbo]

A lot of chicks get pregnant on birth control too...

[Tattoo70]

You could always do your own research. Let us know in 9 months what happens "Dad"!! Ha ha!!!

[mwolffey]

lol...i wish

[marcus300]

This particular chunk of banal data has been propagated for years, often weaseling it's way into the very defining profile of the compound itself. It ubiquitously appears in numerous threads having survived as presumptive lore on multiple sites including:
http://www.steroid.com/82.php
http://www.steroid4sale.com/descript...enanthate.html
http://www.buysteroids.org/profiles/testosteroneent.htm

Conveniently, this trite information merely references an alleged study that is always described as "reported". This is quite troubling as many aas users attest to not experiencing said effect, and often the diametric opposite...impregnation.

Unfortunately, (and again conveniently) as mentioned above by other members we have no dosage to go by, due the absence of this inscrutably "reported" research. And though many, including myself have performed enumerative searches for this unobtainable grail it remains at large, and I incredulous.

Its indoctrination can be traced to the bodybuilding magazine Muscle Media 2000, June July 1993 on page 45. However, each account phantomly yields the exact same information, echoed repeatedly by Hitchcock’s raven…”Never more, never more!” Virtually as surreal is the almost eerie consistency of its adeptly nebulous prologue, “A few years ago…”. Come on! That’s only a degree away from “Once upon a time”!

Such fugitiveness, evokes more than a questioning of veracity, but challenges its very existence. This conjecture directly parallels other supposed answer holding creatures like Big Foot, Nessie, and Yeti (the Abominable Snowman), all of which seem to fall innocuously into the same mundane classification of “reported”.

At one point due no doubt to internet frustration, I actually joined the Lancet (via the free and albeit limited registrant status), at http://www.thelancet.com/ and scoured their medical journal database to no avail.

As Rod Serling would say, "I’ve filed this one (at least the study, not the possibility of said effects) under ‘A’ for adjunct apparition…in the Twilight Zone".

M.

magic you have gone to new limits with your vocabulary this time

[IIIIIIIIIIII]

Ya, I must say..that was probally the most intelluctual post on here......

and people call us meatheads...*tsk*tsk*

[Maldorf]

It really is a bunch of bull crapola. I fathered both of my daughters while on fairly heavy cycles. I was using 75 mg tren ED, 500 mg test E/week, 40 mg dbol /day, and even some EQ on top of that. It didnt do shit to stop my sperm production. The first time my wife got pregnant 2 months after going off of the pill, and the second time she was pregnant just 1 month after stopping it.

[spywizard]

It only takes 1 sperm to fertilize an egg,

there are many factors, as we are trying to get prego, here is my experience.

750-1000mg test e
60mg var
500mg eq

sperm count 100,000 basically sterile

6 months later sperm count 10,000,000 barely getting anyone prego

3 months later sperm count 34,000,000 in the normal range

2 months later still sperm count 62,000,000 well in the higher range..

pct, extended clomid, arginine, dhea

it was a heavy cycle,with a longer pct... clomid did not exceed 30 days per cycle of use..

[Bigmax]

I can go in to all kinds of details about research and data but i wont waste you guys time but i'll say this.....I have a nine year old and he was conceived when on a monster cycle(2500mgs that was just the test)so they can make all the finding they want ccause as far as i'm concerned they are full of sh*T

[Maldorf]

I can go in to all kinds of details about research and data but i wont waste you guys time but i'll say this.....I have a nine year old and he was conceived when on a monster cycle(2500mgs that was just the test)so they can make all the finding they want ccause as far as i'm concerned they are full of sh*T

Exactly, that is what I am convinced of too.

[pumpd4lif]

sorry but in my case that is totall and utter rubbish...............
i have fathered 2 of my 4 children whilst running gear that included test e............

booz is of the .8% lol

[hardgainer1]

if Tripple H can father a child.....