deca or eq?

**castertroy** · 09-10-2006, 12:56 PM

from what i hear:
deca pros: lots of mass , easy on body
deca cons: lots of bloat and chance of gyno

eq pros: lean gains, easy on sides
eq cons: takes forever to fully kick in ( 15 week cycles recommended)

i wanted to know what is the safest one on the body. many ppl hate eq from what i hear. any one ever try both with a test cycle? which did u prefer?

**Hellmaskbanned** · 09-10-2006, 01:04 PM

Test Bloats ALOT worse then Deca IMO.

DECA

**PROTEINSHAKE** · 09-10-2006, 06:25 PM

why not do test/deca & run proper compounds to prevent gyno & keep bloat down? seems like the best of both worlds to me.

**ghoul000** · 09-10-2006, 06:32 PM

Read the deca and test profiles on this sight. Deca has min water retention. They claim it can be used as a cutting agent due to the lean mass you build. Test is going to make you retain water, but you shed it as soon as you stop.

**Erwin** · 09-10-2006, 06:41 PM

Bump for castertroy on whether anyone has run both compounds in the same cycle and what they thought about it

***G-1000*** · 09-10-2006, 06:42 PM

Who said deca was easy on teh body. It's Not.

**castertroy** · 09-10-2006, 09:31 PM

thanks u guys, strange how i was getting mixed reactions on the site. everybody's different. i guess i'll just have to try both lol.

**shadowman** · 09-10-2006, 10:21 PM

Of the two I think deca is best BUT everyone is different.

**Rider** · 09-11-2006, 01:08 AM

Deca and EQ have their pros and cons, it is up to the user to choose what suits best for him.I consider Deca as a very good compound but it is very suppresive on HPTA