Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Starting Cycle No. 2 sooner?
-
09-30-2006, 06:02 PM #1
Starting Cycle No. 2 sooner?
STATS:
29 years old, 180 lbs, 5'-10", 12-14 % b.f., many years lifting off and on.
First Cycle:
TBOL only
Week 1-6: 60 mg/ed
Week 7-8: nolva 20 mg/ed
I completed this cycle (including pct) four weeks ago. I felt great and still do. PCT didnt seem to do anything to help any recovery (didnt feel like I needed to recover).
QUESTION:
I have read/ researched that one should take time off equal to time on including pct., however, I want to start my second cycle sooner. This is based on the fact that I feel great and want to step it up. Here is my next planned cycle:
1-12: Test E @ 500mg/ew
1-8: Tbol @ 60 mg/ed
then the standard nolva and proviron five week pct.
I want to begin in two weeks (six weeks after completion of last pct of 1st cycle) or even sooner if poss.
What are the cons?
I know I might get flamed but I am just curious. Thanks for your patients and insights.
-
09-30-2006, 06:17 PM #2
u can do a blood work if results r gr8 then u can start
-
09-30-2006, 06:47 PM #3
great
-
09-30-2006, 09:44 PM #4
Didn't the first cycle teach you anything. You only weigh 180 lbs. Man you need to learn how to eat..........you don't need gear but more protein..Simple
-
10-01-2006, 12:05 AM #5
Yeah, I learned a lot, hero. I know how to eat and your comment means nothing except that you like to waste your time being a jackass. Read my original post, idiot. I asked for cons, not your dumbass opinion.
I went from 159 to 180 on No. 1.
Thanks for the lesson, you can go back to the AR lounge. I asked for insight not stupidity.Last edited by Johny-too-small; 10-01-2006 at 12:10 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)