-
10-20-2006, 06:11 AM #1
Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Something I was thinking about for my website
I was thinking about the way you can go to the *Please read the rules. Do not post UGL names.* website, and type in a name of a source, and check if they are an authorized remailer....I was wondering if people would be interested if I put a similar feature on my site, which would be a sourcecheck feature, where you could type in the name of a source, and see if they are legit or a scammer, or unknown so far.
Would anyone be interested in seeing a feature like this on my site? (It would be updated as frequently as necessary)
-
10-20-2006, 06:14 AM #2
Anthony,
I would be interested and I sure other would as well.
-
10-20-2006, 06:31 AM #3
sounds Like a great idea bro go for It
-
10-20-2006, 07:05 AM #4
Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 2,222
Yes, that would be greate.
-
10-20-2006, 07:17 AM #5
Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
It would require constant feedback and updating from people, though...and it would require I compile an initial database of maybe 50 or so sources...so constant feedback from people who visit my site would be necessary...
I'm assuming everyone here would also be willing to help me out with this, if I decide to give it a go....
-
10-20-2006, 07:19 AM #6
Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by salmon1
-
10-20-2006, 07:21 AM #7
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
is this for .com's or UGL's
-
10-20-2006, 07:23 AM #8
Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by V_Vandetta
-
10-20-2006, 07:25 AM #9
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
count me In ..... I know plenty of ligit UGL's that i have used ,, and I belong to sevral Open boards ....
-
10-20-2006, 07:26 AM #10
I like the idea. Would help cut back on the pm source checks the mods/vets get, as well as from what I've seen lately, basically just complaining by new guys about how they gotta wait this long to pm and that long to check a source.
-
10-20-2006, 07:29 AM #11
Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by DARKSEID
-
10-20-2006, 07:32 AM #12
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
true but IMO will take alot of work keeping up.. becasue we both know its not uncommen for UGL to go scammer.. and than with all the new labs popping up ED along with .coms . seems like alot of work
-
10-20-2006, 08:45 AM #13
I would be all for it as long as everyone responded honestly about the product. We all know that sometimes people promote other UGL's just to help theyre business start. I would like to see true feedback on the labs product. i would contribute to this as well, of course.....
-
10-20-2006, 08:53 AM #14
Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by goalseeker
-
10-20-2006, 08:58 AM #15
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
amen brotha thats the way it should be and earned
-
10-20-2006, 09:00 AM #16
Originally Posted by salmon1
LMAO
-
10-20-2006, 09:00 AM #17
I checked mine with the site was ok and they were still supposely selling counterfiets.
-
10-20-2006, 09:01 AM #18
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
Def. a good idea to separate class's between the ugl's that have been around and proven themselves to very well known people down to the guy who's doing his first cycle and the ones that are relatively new.
-
10-20-2006, 09:04 AM #19
Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- somewhere
- Posts
- 2,738
Originally Posted by V_Vandetta
-
10-20-2006, 09:04 AM #20
Originally Posted by BigGuns101
I have heard of a few that do this .. also one in mind that sells knock off mex gear real gear but knock off label
-
10-20-2006, 09:04 AM #21
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
-
10-20-2006, 09:05 AM #22
Originally Posted by V_Vandetta
-
10-20-2006, 09:07 AM #23
Originally Posted by BigGuns101
that was my point as well ... I think a good screening process and time lime in the game with Reffs and posstive feedback not just from Vets and board owners
-
10-20-2006, 09:12 AM #24
I would say fuc .coms all together, they get enough business through search engines. Theres no way I could see this working, even if you tested them, the ugl could send you out a hot batch. Maybe if random users tested their gear without anyone knowing, send AR the results and he re-inbursted them the $$ or gear.........................still to many ways to get fuc'd. Sounds like a $$$ maker to me.
-
10-20-2006, 09:24 AM #25
do it, but establish some sort of rating system, to indicate strengths and weaknesses perhaps.
-
10-20-2006, 09:24 AM #26
Originally Posted by salmon1
-
10-20-2006, 09:26 AM #27
Just doesnt seem like a good idea, just like the scammers list years ago, people could sabatoge other ugl's but having people make false claims of scamming.
-
10-20-2006, 09:37 AM #28
Originally Posted by BigGuns101
makes sense now .....
-
10-20-2006, 10:13 AM #29
Who is hosting your website, is it hosted overseas? are you going to be using a database for this list SSL to your web sever? I mean any little script kiddy can crack in to unsecured web servers, now what do you think the DEA would and could do to your site if you didn't use secure socket connections from a different server.... That's right they will have this list of legit dealers... Because of this reason I don't think any domestic dealers would want to be on this golden list...... JMHO
-
10-20-2006, 10:13 AM #30
Originally Posted by BigGuns101
-
10-20-2006, 10:29 AM #31
sounds like a great idea... this 45 day 100 posts rule is ridiculous for the newbs.. only benefits the hal of famers....and it will definitely make your site get hundreds of extra hits a day..
-
10-20-2006, 10:31 AM #32
Originally Posted by salmon1
-
10-20-2006, 10:45 AM #33
Originally Posted by DARKSEID
-
10-20-2006, 10:55 AM #34
Originally Posted by BigGuns101
My bad then, thought he meant for buyers.
-
10-20-2006, 11:18 AM #35
Originally Posted by DARKSEID
-
10-20-2006, 12:18 PM #36
2/3 Deca 1/3 Test
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 7,964
Well who would be validating wether or not they are legit or a scammer ? You ?
Sure, why not. Not to say I will solely use that to validate any source but still....Last edited by guest589745; 10-20-2006 at 04:28 PM.
-
10-20-2006, 01:47 PM #37
Never mind.
-
10-20-2006, 02:02 PM #38
When are you going to make that new steroid effectiveness chart that we posted all these ideas for............Been awhile. Did you give up on that?
-
10-20-2006, 02:22 PM #39
Originally Posted by salmon1
-rodge
-
10-20-2006, 02:33 PM #40
I dont like the sound of it at all. And..I dont like the one on ** site and wouldnt use it to verify any source.
There are too many complications and problems that can arise IMHO. Any idea may also bring down what reputation you have Anthony.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Front Loading Before a 2 wks...
06-21-2024, 05:12 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS