Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 63

Thread: Deca or Boldenone

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    97

    Deca or Boldenone

    Which one more produces more results Deca or Boldenone (EQ)?. I like to hear expierences from people who had both.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Golds Gym
    Posts
    1,540
    Quote Originally Posted by firedso
    Which one more produces more results Deca or Boldenone (EQ)?. I like to hear expierences from people who had both.
    depends on what your looking for, mass wise deca has personally given me more, if you want to stay lean and vascular then eq is the way to go

  3. #3
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    You will have to try them for yourself its impossible for us to tell you how you will respond but IMHO EQ is a weak worthless drug and deca beats its everytime.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Golds Gym
    Posts
    1,540
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300
    You will have to try them for yourself its impossible for us to tell you how you will respond but IMHO EQ is a weak worthless drug and deca beats its everytime.
    marcus are you saying eq is weak in terms of building mass, or just weak in all aspects

  5. #5
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    Quote Originally Posted by GHO5T
    marcus are you saying eq is weak in terms of building mass, or just weak in all aspects
    In everything its very weak.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    97
    thanks for the reply,s i know i will have to see what it does for me but its nice to hear some opinions.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    97
    BTW what i,m looking for is which ever one produces the most results. I,m looking to gain weight.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    agree with Marcus. I will not be using EQ again. Deca wins!

  9. #9
    You'll have to try them yourself. i personally prefer EQ because I like the vascularity I get from it, Deca leaves me bloated.

  10. #10
    I love nandrolone.

    Boldenone propionate kicked my ass hard.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    VA - Formerly OH
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by firedso
    BTW what i,m looking for is which ever one produces the most results. I,m looking to gain weight.
    Then you definitely don't want to waste your money on EQ. It takes at least 3 months to see the slightest improvements in vascularity, and it's relatively expensive.

    If you want mass, go with deca, or maybe even tren in conjunction with your core test base.

    I gained a solid 15 lbs in my first 8 weeks of my tren prop cycle.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    E London,no SOURCES given
    Posts
    14,947
    deca definiatly for mass,but i do love the eq for vascularity,imo thats all it is good for tho......................
    _____________________

    Remember.............for us to help you you need to help us....................stats and exp.........

    Source checks and Ugl's to be kept to PM's
    dont ask for source checks unless you have 100 posts/and 45 days minimum as a participating member.........

    Booz.. a long-standing member of the AR Police:

    sorry but absolutely no sources will be checked at this present time....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    2,738
    deca deca deca.... EQ sucked for me..

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    VA - Formerly OH
    Posts
    2,774
    EQ sucky-sucky long time

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    2,738
    its funny that even like 1.5 years ago EQ was really hyped around here...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Great Halo City,Angel
    Posts
    52
    dBol for me i was fat real fat so I cycled super test 250 dBol eq with 2 gallons water a day,bc powder and ef and lots of meat lil carbs im 50 bt now my bodys a lean 19 and i hear hgh works on ageing and hair wonder whats next
    good luck,oh and the 5 weeks dBoll every day,I pumped everyday and my trainer said not to but he cant believe my body and he was entered in Texas power lifting hall of fame here in Texas in 2005 so my body should be waisting not blasting south west Texas University whip tails but research gave me my youth back its just a fact,how can it be wronge,I would stay away from drug that cause yo to retain fluide then lose it AN THE SIZE oh no thats a waist of life Bro

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Misty Mountains
    Posts
    120

    Deca Vs. EQ

    I have run both.
    EQ at 400mg wk X 12 weeks Stacked w/sust
    Deca at 400 mg wk X 10 weeks stacked w/ sust
    Bottom line...Very little visible gains from EQ, felt achy in my joints Especially the elbows. Deca: no joint pain and actually seemed to give relief to joint problems. Mass through the roof and very little bloating (run w/ letro).
    Just my $0.02

    G74

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by stupidhippo
    its funny that even like 1.5 years ago EQ was really hyped around here...
    So true! EQ was all the rage and deca was out of style.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by BajanBastard
    So true! EQ was all the rage and deca was out of style.


    I remember those days as well. I am currently using deca in my current cycle.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    123
    EQ cycles have to be very long - 6+ months. It is clealry very mild, but you can stay on damn near all the time if you want to. It's also a good choice for women who don't want virilization. The point is that there's a reason that there are so many different drugs out there: different applications. Farmer Freddie may want his beef cattle to get as bulky as possible ASAP, but Harry Horseman wants to run his racehorse every day and help it recover more effectively from the added workout stressors. Finaject for one, EQ for the other...

    In one of the first ***** issues (check their archives if you can stand the place), they interviewed Louie Simmons about his drug use, and he said he hadn't been off EQ for some ungodly number of years.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,282
    Yeah...even a year ago EQ was the shiznit...in fact, I bought two vials of it based on what I read here...I will use it in my next cycle cause I have it...I do not expect much...just the appetite boost and the vascularity. I have not tried Deca...yet...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Golds Gym
    Posts
    1,540
    Quote Originally Posted by BigJames
    Yeah...even a year ago EQ was the shiznit...in fact, I bought two vials of it based on what I read here...I will use it in my next cycle cause I have it...I do not expect much...just the appetite boost and the vascularity. I have not tried Deca...yet...
    i dunno why thats funny

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,196
    Eq would work great for me right now cause the drol is killing my appetite like crazy! And I was eating like a horse last time I used EQ I wonder if the EQ would offset the appetite supressing effect of the drol?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    Deca all the way

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Den sitta på huk ställ
    Posts
    3,476
    Both yield great results for me...I really have no preference, it just boils down to my reasoning I want to run one or the other and the goals of the cycle one or the other will be incorporated into.
    One way or another, they both have a place in a cycle somewhere for me.

    -ShrpSkn

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    you know there are no studies that prove the appetite increase, i know MANY MANY people who have utilized more tren than any of you could phathom and they experienced no increase in appetite different than any other WEAK AAS could induce.. anabolism = increase appetite due to inrease LBM/Metabolic rate.

  27. #27
    If you haven't seen it, check the following chart out, it will give you a basic guideline but will vary somewhat person-to-person:

    http://www.steroid.com/effect.php

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    lol @ that chart.. i think there are FAR to many stars on EQ bout str and other gains LOL
    oh well

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    316
    Stick with those words....works the same on me. deca gave me some real good size but rebounding was a bitch for me. Eq is slow but gives me solid gains that look nice and lean, unlike the deca puffy look!


    Quote Originally Posted by GHO5T
    depends on what your looking for, mass wise deca has personally given me more, if you want to stay lean and vascular then eq is the way to go

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    2,738
    the chart is terrible!!!

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    264
    deca

  32. #32
    The last cycle with Deca I had 25lbs gain. Deca 4 me.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    97
    thanks guys.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    97
    I Suppose deca is also better for strength gains?

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    1 horse town
    Posts
    187
    I wouldnt say EQ sucks.. they are both different and have their own characteristics... Ive used both with great success.. If ur looking for quality and easy to maintain gains...EQ is ur best bet... If ur looking for Mass with more of a bloat look.. Deca With both u should be taking some sort of Testosterone.. I took EQ for 15 weeks and it worked great for me at 400mg a week.. Everyone is different and just because something works for someone else doesnt mean its going to work for u..

  36. #36
    If you have around 14%BF and aren't the most vascular of people, will you be happy with the vascularity from 600mgs. EW?

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    Quote Originally Posted by BajanBastard
    So true! EQ was all the rage and deca was out of style.
    I HAVE NEVER ADVOCATED EQ to anyone cept FEMALES!

    that is all.. carry on

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Work,School,Gym
    Posts
    620
    if deca is so great, then, why do most people I know say to stay away from it because you get "Deca Dick" (limp as hell). Im not putting it down or anything i am just wondering? No one has had this problem?

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    434
    I like them both

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    VA - Formerly OH
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by taiboxa
    I HAVE NEVER ADVOCATED EQ to anyone cept FEMALES!

    that is all.. carry on
    Wait a minute! You told me to try it last cycle.
    I see how it is. It dd make my vagina more vascular after 53 weeks.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •