Which one more produces more results Deca or Boldenone (EQ)?. I like to hear expierences from people who had both.
Which one more produces more results Deca or Boldenone (EQ)?. I like to hear expierences from people who had both.
depends on what your looking for, mass wise deca has personally given me more, if you want to stay lean and vascular then eq is the way to goOriginally Posted by firedso
You will have to try them for yourself its impossible for us to tell you how you will respond but IMHO EQ is a weak worthless drug and deca beats its everytime.
marcus are you saying eq is weak in terms of building mass, or just weak in all aspectsOriginally Posted by marcus300
In everything its very weak.Originally Posted by GHO5T
thanks for the reply,s i know i will have to see what it does for me but its nice to hear some opinions.
BTW what i,m looking for is which ever one produces the most results. I,m looking to gain weight.
agree with Marcus. I will not be using EQ again. Deca wins!
You'll have to try them yourself. i personally prefer EQ because I like the vascularity I get from it, Deca leaves me bloated.
I love nandrolone.
Boldenone propionate kicked my ass hard.
Then you definitely don't want to waste your money on EQ. It takes at least 3 months to see the slightest improvements in vascularity, and it's relatively expensive.Originally Posted by firedso
If you want mass, go with deca, or maybe even tren in conjunction with your core test base.
I gained a solid 15 lbs in my first 8 weeks of my tren prop cycle.
deca definiatly for mass,but i do love the eq for vascularity,imo thats all it is good for tho......................
_____________________
Remember.............for us to help you you need to help us....................stats and exp.........![]()
Source checks and Ugl's to be kept to PM's
dont ask for source checks unless you have 100 posts/and 45 days minimum as a participating member.........
Booz.. a long-standing member of the AR Police:
sorry but absolutely no sources will be checked at this present time....
deca deca deca.... EQ sucked for me..
EQ sucky-sucky long time
its funny that even like 1.5 years ago EQ was really hyped around here...
dBol for me i was fat real fat so I cycled super test 250 dBol eq with 2 gallons water a day,bc powder and ef and lots of meat lil carbs im 50 bt now my bodys a lean 19 and i hear hgh works on ageing and hair wonder whats next
good luck,oh and the 5 weeks dBoll every day,I pumped everyday and my trainer said not to but he cant believe my body and he was entered in Texas power lifting hall of fame here in Texas in 2005 so my body should be waisting not blasting south west Texas University whip tails but research gave me my youth back its just a fact,how can it be wronge,I would stay away from drug that cause yo to retain fluide then lose it AN THE SIZE oh no thats a waist of life Bro
I have run both.
EQ at 400mg wk X 12 weeks Stacked w/sust
Deca at 400 mg wk X 10 weeks stacked w/ sust
Bottom line...Very little visible gains from EQ, felt achy in my joints Especially the elbows. Deca: no joint pain and actually seemed to give relief to joint problems. Mass through the roof and very little bloating (run w/ letro).
Just my $0.02
G74
So true! EQ was all the rage and deca was out of style.Originally Posted by stupidhippo
Originally Posted by BajanBastard
I remember those days as well. I am currently using deca in my current cycle.
EQ cycles have to be very long - 6+ months. It is clealry very mild, but you can stay on damn near all the time if you want to. It's also a good choice for women who don't want virilization. The point is that there's a reason that there are so many different drugs out there: different applications. Farmer Freddie may want his beef cattle to get as bulky as possible ASAP, but Harry Horseman wants to run his racehorse every day and help it recover more effectively from the added workout stressors. Finaject for one, EQ for the other...
In one of the first ***** issues (check their archives if you can stand the place), they interviewed Louie Simmons about his drug use, and he said he hadn't been off EQ for some ungodly number of years.
Yeah...even a year ago EQ was the shiznit...in fact, I bought two vials of it based on what I read here...I will use it in my next cycle cause I have it...I do not expect much...just the appetite boost and the vascularity. I have not tried Deca...yet...
Originally Posted by BigJames
![]()
i dunno why thats funny
![]()
![]()
Eq would work great for me right now cause the drol is killing my appetite like crazy! And I was eating like a horse last time I used EQ I wonder if the EQ would offset the appetite supressing effect of the drol?
Deca all the way
Both yield great results for me...I really have no preference, it just boils down to my reasoning I want to run one or the other and the goals of the cycle one or the other will be incorporated into.
One way or another, they both have a place in a cycle somewhere for me.
-ShrpSkn
you know there are no studies that prove the appetite increase, i know MANY MANY people who have utilized more tren than any of you could phathom and they experienced no increase in appetite different than any other WEAK AAS could induce.. anabolism = increase appetite due to inrease LBM/Metabolic rate.
If you haven't seen it, check the following chart out, it will give you a basic guideline but will vary somewhat person-to-person:
http://www.steroid.com/effect.php
lol @ that chart.. i think there are FAR to many stars on EQ bout str and other gains LOL
oh well
Stick with those words....works the same on me. deca gave me some real good size but rebounding was a bitch for me. Eq is slow but gives me solid gains that look nice and lean, unlike the deca puffy look!
Originally Posted by GHO5T
the chart is terrible!!!
deca
The last cycle with Deca I had 25lbs gain. Deca 4 me.
thanks guys.
I Suppose deca is also better for strength gains?
I wouldnt say EQ sucks.. they are both different and have their own characteristics... Ive used both with great success.. If ur looking for quality and easy to maintain gains...EQ is ur best bet... If ur looking for Mass with more of a bloat look.. Deca With both u should be taking some sort of Testosterone.. I took EQ for 15 weeks and it worked great for me at 400mg a week.. Everyone is different and just because something works for someone else doesnt mean its going to work for u..
If you have around 14%BF and aren't the most vascular of people, will you be happy with the vascularity from 600mgs. EW?
I HAVE NEVER ADVOCATED EQ to anyone cept FEMALES!Originally Posted by BajanBastard
that is all.. carry on
if deca is so great, then, why do most people I know say to stay away from it because you get "Deca Dick" (limp as hell). Im not putting it down or anything i am just wondering? No one has had this problem?
I like them both
Wait a minute! You told me to try it last cycle.Originally Posted by taiboxa
I see how it is. It dd make my vagina more vascular after 53 weeks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)