more mg or more compounds

[shredzs]

do you guys find it better to stick to fewer compounds at higher doses,
or do you prefer many compounds at lower doses?

[magic32]

This varies, and is contingent upon the individual's cycle history.

M.

[shredzs]

do you think it is worth running more than 3 compounds at 1 time?

[marcus300]

running alot of compounds doesnt aid any benefit IMHO, 3 compounds which suit each other would be a better option and run it as long as you keep gaining.

[shrpskn]

Agree with marcus...

A cycle typically never contains more than 3 different compounds with me and that's usually only if it's a cycle with a long-ester base compound.

1.)A base compound, usually test.
2.)A kickstart compound, unless it's already a short-ester cycle.
3.)An assistant or finisher compound..., to either work synergistically with the stack and/or keep me as primed as possible right up to PCT.

-ShrpSkn

[G-1000]

I would have to say it depends on you goals also. To use 2 3 compounds in a cycle is not a lot. It also depends on how long the cycle is.

[shredzs]

thanks guys,
I was just generally speaking to find out what guys prefer

[Tazwell]

To use more than 3 compounds you would really have to know what your doing, if you don't you might just waist your money.

[shredzs]

To use more than 3 compounds you would really have to know what your doing, if you don't you might just waist your money.

yeah, thats what I was thinking

[magic32]

running alot of compounds doesnt aid any benefit IMHO, 3 compounds which suit each other would be a better option and run it as long as you keep gaining.

Agreed.
They should compliment each other and be of different types. Learn the three basics and you'll be fine.

M.