-
12-30-2006, 02:33 AM #1
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
upcoming experiment with a short cycle-my next cycle
after doing some research, and having put some thought into it, im going to give a short cycle a shot. the reason? i was three weeks into a cycle and had to quit due to cellulitis in my shoulder.
its been over two weeks now, and im still holding seven. this stirred my curiosity, and im going to see if i can replicate it.
this is the cycle:
1000-1250mg test e front load
week 1-2: 500mg test e mwf
week 3-4: 50mg dbol ed
im still debating the dbol, as i may just run test for the full four weeks.
this will be followed by 4-6 weeks of pct.
this will be the only time i try this cycle (unless the results are good), as im already planning the next one around tren /prop.
my reasons for running the test are that its what i have at the moment. i know thats not a great reason, but its my reason. i know i should use a short ester, but others have used something similar to this with decent results. my whole objective is to see if me keeping the weight from the last cycle was just sheer luck, and to also give a short cycle a shot.
my objective is to keep at least five of whatever i gain.
im following the advice of marcus and priming myself for this cycle, so i still have almost two weeks until i start it.
i will post day-to-day results as it progresses. i will post pics as well.
any comments?
-
I'm lost a 4 weeks cycle???
-
12-30-2006, 07:58 AM #3
Have you already read my PM? if so then plz reread
-
12-30-2006, 08:03 AM #4
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
I think because the three weeks gave him 7 pounds he wants to try a 4 weeker... I'm not really sure.
Either way I dont think test e is the best way to go about it. Too long an esther... JMHO
MOTO
-
12-30-2006, 08:12 AM #5
Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Pennslyvania
- Posts
- 2,449
go for it. we need more info on here with guys on shorties. short esters are better though. this would work better with prop
-
Originally Posted by AnabolicBoy1981
no we dont.
5 weeks cycle are comin. just need to know what compounds to run.
-
12-30-2006, 09:24 AM #7
i heard it takes around 4 weeks just for the test-e to kick in..i duno if those high mg numbers will make a great benefit in such shortness
-
12-30-2006, 09:35 AM #8
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
IMO one can use longer esters for short cycles, that is why the bro is frontloading, but it takes a very experienced bro to actually plan this w/ longer esters as many aspects are needed to be planned to a higher degree than usual. You have to know extactly how long it takes for the test to kick in to your body, you have to know when its going to kick in, and from several previous cycles one must know how much one can gain in that amount of time when on that specific aas (as you have only a limited amount of time to gain from once the test kicks in)
This is why IMO short cycles are better left for the very experienced who have more than enough cycles under their belt and posses the knowledge and dedication it takes to fully plan everything out to the exact, and fully go thru w/ it. There are many other aspects of a short cycle that im sure many of us dont know about, and have no knowledge of.
Not trying to bash your cycle bro, not my intentions at all, just something to consider. I do wish you the best of luck, and keep us posted on how everything goes bro.
-
12-30-2006, 10:28 PM #9
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
this is my first attempt at putting a short cycle together. im probably going to tweak it some on the advice of a couple of people. thats why i posted it early instead of when i began it. i would rather gather feedback from everyone than just jump in. this is more of an experiment of sorts.
test e works pretty well for me, otherwise i would not even try it. i usually feel it kick in no later than week 4. i have ran test/dbol more than any other cycle, so i feel comfortable with it.
as i said before, i have around two weeks until i start, and i may try to get my hands on some tren /prop in between.
-
12-31-2006, 12:31 AM #10
Im running a short 5 week cycle, and by the end of the 3rd week I actually got my blood levels too high from my long esters and the sides kicked my ass. Long esters can indeed be run in these short cycles. I am up 20 pounds from the first 3 weeks. Next time I will be able to tweak things a bit and hopefully not get myself into the same trouble.
-
12-31-2006, 01:41 AM #11
I read about long ester loading. There's threads on it here...the math proved it wasn't all it was supposed to be. I think it was Warrior who wrote it.
If you're doing short cycles...mininum 6 weeks...and a fast ester ie) prop or suspension.
-
12-31-2006, 02:18 AM #12
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
six weeks is too long. planning four on and four off...
-
12-31-2006, 09:28 AM #13
To design a short cycle what suits you body you would need to post your previous cycle history and results from the compounds used, also for short cycling to work the best it can, you will need to prime the body for 6-8wks beforehand and by doing this you will open a very big growth window for muscle tissue to grow fast and create a anabolic environment which is needed for short cycling,
Long esters and short ester can be used but long ester are best left to the advance because of the amount used for the body respond fast.
-
12-31-2006, 12:37 PM #14
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
-
12-31-2006, 07:00 PM #15
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by Money Boss Hustla
as i said earlier, i want to see if i can keep five after pct...
-
01-01-2007, 02:03 PM #16
I fully respect what you're saying. However, from experience (and others experience) a four week cycle is going to give you minimal gains.
IMHO I would go 6 weeks at a much higher dose than a standard cycle.
-
01-01-2007, 02:11 PM #17
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
thing is, im not trying to gain massive amounts. im trying to keep as much of what i put on as possible.
based on stuff i have read on this forum, as well as other sites (read almost everything i could find on short cycles, including paul borresen's articles), four weeks seems optimal.
im also out to satisfy my scientific curiosity about whether this was just a fluke event, or if there is some actual method to this madness of short cycles.
this one is just a trial run, just so i can get a good feel for a four week cycle. the next one will be tren /prop and maybe win.
this may work for some, and it may work for me as well, or it may not. only time will tell...
-
What are your goals? Are you bulking or cutting what???
-
01-01-2007, 02:58 PM #19
Originally Posted by Money Boss Hustla
-
01-01-2007, 03:05 PM #20
Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 2,482
I run short cycles w/ long esters but its not composed of only long esters. I'd choose sust over test e because of the 100mg of deconate. It will stick w/ you. tren works great in short runs.
need to know goals.
-
01-01-2007, 03:55 PM #21
4 week cycles are very effective at building muscle tissue and maintaining it, if the proper procedures are carried out like priming beforehand and running the right compounds running 4 weeks cycles are far better IMHO, you will need to read up on them and fully understand how they work and make sure you prime the body and open the growth window, if you do all the above correctly you will have the best gains and be amazed how much muscle you can build and maintain.
-
01-01-2007, 04:46 PM #22
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
-
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
Have fun.
-
01-01-2007, 04:58 PM #24
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
im still researching short cycles, and plan to continue to do so. i still have a lot to learn, and my brain is soaking it all up. there is so much out there to read, and i plan on getting my hands on all of it.
marcus and alex have helped me out with this, and i will continue to follow their advice. if this goes well, i will be a short cycle advocate...
-
01-01-2007, 05:01 PM #25
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
-
The only resin why you will take there advise is because they said what you wont to hear.
You basically dismissed what everyone said about running a short ester.
-
01-01-2007, 05:03 PM #27
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
-
Lets break this down. If you run a long ester you 4 weeks it’s still going to be a 6-week cycle. The long ester will never have time to get blood levels even. Pulse you going to need to give the long ester almost 2-weeks to even get into your system. So out of that all you might get 3 weeks at your dose.
If you run short ester it can be in your system and level in 2 days. You can run it for 4 weeks and start pct in just days after not weeks. You will see gain with in the first few days. You will also be able to run it 4 or 6 weeks and still will be ahead of the game.
-
01-01-2007, 05:17 PM #29
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
what i really want to hear is that this will work, but those words will only come from my own results. if it works for me, it doesnt mean that your body will respond the exact same way, even if our diets/training are identical.
trial and error, isnt that what this is all about?
-
01-01-2007, 05:21 PM #30
what would be the benefit of long ester Vs short ester in a short cycle??
-
01-01-2007, 05:21 PM #31
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
-
Ya your not even thinking of the same compounds i am.
I talking test sup tren base winny things like that.
I i was to wont to stick 2 times a day this is what i woudl do
test susp 100mg 2x day
tren base 100mg split dose x2
t-bol 60mg day
i would run that for 5 to 6 weeks. add some igf and the is a crazy ride.
-
Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
-
01-01-2007, 05:26 PM #34
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
by following the advice of marcus and priming for this cycle, if i dont get the tren and prop in time, i will have pretty much missed what he calls the window of growth, hehe.
i was really tempted to just run a traditional 10 week test/dbol cycle after my arm healed, but then i started reading up on the short cycles, and i want to try it.
i am well aware that i am not using the best combo for this, but it can work...
-
01-01-2007, 05:26 PM #35
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
-
it would be a painfull sob
-
01-01-2007, 05:34 PM #37
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
keep in mind my initial reason for even trying this-i had to abort a cycle three weeks in, and have retained some of the weight from it, even after dealing with cellulitis and treatment...
-
01-02-2007, 12:11 AM #38
Okay...not trying to be a d*ck here...but this is the most frustrating thing about AS. People not listening. Gsxxr and I just had this conversation.
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
Originally Posted by Gsxxr
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
Originally Posted by evil pepsi
-
01-02-2007, 01:13 AM #39
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 153
so tell me one person that can add five pounds naturally in the span of four weeks? im not talking about just adding five pounds. the whole cycle is about seeing how much i can put on in four weeks, and seeing if i can keep at least five of it.
not to be a dick either, but just because you dont feel it until week five, does that make it the rule for everyone else?
i am not taking this lightly, and i made an adult decision.
as for the scientific proof, im just walking where others have stood before me. im not trying to be a pioneer, or do something nobody else has. had i not seen evidence of people following this cycle prior, nor had i not exchanged ideas with others that have experimented with it, i would not try it...at all.
-
01-02-2007, 03:44 AM #40
Long ester's can be used in a short cycle but because of the amount of mg ED needs to be used its normally only done by the advanced, so if you havent got alot of cycle history and experience i would go with a short ester in a short cycle,
Short cycling is used from amatures to pro's with great results, its safer and far more productive in building muscle and maintaining it,the longer you are on cycle the more sides or harder to rebound and recover, staying on longer is just old school, if it worked staying on cycle would give you more gains we would all be 500lbs+,
If all the proper procedures are done with short cycling results are amazing, make sure you prime the body and design a cycle to suit your goals and not what you have left over, many people dont understand the concept of short cycling or even tried it but if they did it would change the whole ideas on using AAS,
I have a some excellent feedback from Warroir who was very unsure about short cycling, i will post it in this forum for you to see, he as totally changed his way of cycling because of the results,
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Front Loading Before a 2 wks...
06-21-2024, 05:12 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS