Test E 20 weeks

[anonymous22]

I have only ran two cycles before of test e and tren. My last cycle I did 15 weeks of test e at 750 mg a week, and ended with 7.5 weeks of tren. I never really want to run a lot of stuff because i break out really bad from the tren. I was wondering what people thought of test e for 20 weeks at 500 mgs a week to reduce sides and breaking out.

[1buffsob]

I think that 20 weeks is more than likely going to be extreme overkill. Stop when the gains stagnate. As for the sides and acne, if you were good on test before, then there shouldn't be any reasons for increased sides.

[fLgAtOr]

I think that 20 weeks is more than likely going to be extreme overkill. Stop when the gains stagnate. As for the sides and acne, if you were good on test before, then there shouldn't be any reasons for increased sides.

Agreed. I don't think you realize hoowww looonnnggg 20 weeks is while ON. And, I'm willing to bet a bottle of test that your gains WILL stagnate.

Why not look into other compounds? Looking to bulk, cut? There are tons of options out there...Especially ones easier on sides than tren.

[Hellmaskbanned]

Personally I think it sounds more logical to do 1 long cycle a year then recover than to to multiple short cycles, and having to recover than shutdown then recover .....but thats My opinion.

[StevePJC]

Sorry to jump in on this but I saw the 20 weeks thing and had to ask: I'm doing 200mg Cyp a week for TRT. Feel like a million bucks after three injects and now am wondering if things will level off later on down the line. Input?

[guest589745]

Personally I think it sounds more logical to do 1 long cycle a year then recover than to to multiple short cycles, and having to recover than shutdown then recover .....but thats My opinion.

I agree.


If you are going to run it 20 weeks, at least switch compounds and use soemthign that may lower SHBG in the later weeks of your cycle.

[Jason865]

20 weeks and only your third cycle??? 99% of the people here do not need more than a 10 week cycle.

[marcus300]

Personally I think it sounds more logical to do 1 long cycle a year then recover than to to multiple short cycles, and having to recover than shutdown then recover .....but thats My opinion.

I would disagree, recovering from a long cycle of 20wks is alot harder to recover from shutting your system down for only a short period, also when your trying to recover from a 20 wk cycle the gains your trying to maintain will start to disappear because recovery is long, ive seen guys build good muscle on long cycles but lose alot when they try to recover from it, after a certain amount of wks gains stop so why carry on with the cycle, once tolerance as been built up you will not experience more gains otherwise we would all be 500+