Just now learning about source check rules and that source checks even exists.I read about the 45 days and 100 post minimum rule and now that has me wondering if the email i received from steroid.com / anabolicreview.com mailing list of international steroid suppliers is legit since you dont even have to be a part of this forum and just have to fill out the form it provides to get an email of the list.I used the number 1 supplier on that list to order my first cycle and i didnt get great results from using
week1-12 test enan 500mg week
week1-9 deca 500mg week
week 1-4 dianabol 35mg day
week 15-16 clomid pct
And i have also ordered my second cycle from that source and plan to try this
week1-12 test enan 1000mg week
week1-8 tren enan 400mg week
week 15-16 clomid pct
I have been a member of that sources forum since
1-18-2006 which was way before my first cycle just asking questions and reading preparing for my first cycle.I now have only alittle over 40 post there which all post were posted for good reasons not just to up the count.But now after i did that first cycle and didnt have great gains im wondering if its a scammer or not.
I decided to give them another try by increasing the dose and having test levels checked pre and mid cycle to see if they elevate much on my second cycle.If results are not any different than my first cycle my only clue as to other sources is a list of about 3 other sources i have obtained through the last year or so to try next and keep doin the blood work in middle of cycle to tell if legit or not.I figure this is much cheaper route than paying lab to check it and taking risk of shipping stuff to a lab and i could get other benefits from checking blood at same time.
Anyways if i ever do reach the 100 post is a source check just to check the sources i know of or are you lead in the direction of a legitimate supplier?Also its a strange rule seems cause seems johnny law wouldnt have much trouble hangin 45 days and doin 100 post to do a source check himself.