Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: omnadren vs. sustanon
-
04-02-2007, 06:35 PM #1
-
04-02-2007, 06:44 PM #2
omnadren for $$$$ reasons
-
04-02-2007, 06:48 PM #3
Originally Posted by Venomous Nemisis
-
04-02-2007, 07:00 PM #4
I think omna and sus are the same now. Didn't they change omna?
-
04-02-2007, 07:01 PM #5
-
04-02-2007, 07:02 PM #6
As long as you get legit Omna's...they are the "exact" same as Sust's.....but much cheaper and a little less painful for some reason....my personal experience.
Omna's are a good choice if you are in the market for test blends. I think you get more for less with these.
My$.02
Dizz
-
04-02-2007, 07:03 PM #7
Originally Posted by MartyMcFly
-
04-02-2007, 07:17 PM #8
Originally Posted by Dizz28
-
04-02-2007, 08:22 PM #9
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- around town
- Posts
- 72
Both are pretty much the same. Just depends on brands and so forth. The esters are now the same, and you shouldn't see much difference with either one, except one (omna) you'll just notice a difference when it comes down to your pocket.
-
04-02-2007, 08:35 PM #10
Ive run both a few times. Sust was fine for me but with the omnadren the sides were wicked. It worked but I hated the sides. And it seemed like nothing slowed them down and they came on alot quicker then any other form of test I have ever taken. That's probably the reason there are 40 unused amps sitting taking up space somewhere.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)